Mafiascum.net

In post 338, thezmon221 wrote:Huh that's weird.

Ffery, what caused that? I personally don't see anything in my post that would change your stance, personally.

That's really bad. Like one of the cardinal types of things you never say, bad. Still like muffin, but damn...

VOTE: Thez

In post 343, morph the cat wrote:

Scum

12. waynegg - Cabd notices a huge aspect of his towngame missing here. ffery has niggles as well.

You're both wrong, btw

In post 351, zMuffinMan wrote:

wayne wrote:When did I say you v Varsoon was anything but TvT?

what was the point of your varsoon vote if you thought it was TvT the whole time?

That was already answered. How about you go back and read instead of just skimming for shit to misrep and start bad pushes on?

wayne wrote:Don't misrep muffin. Your whole double team on Pie with with Varsoon smacks of buddying. I already said that, so why are you trying to confine my thoughts to one post when that isn't what I said?

er... i pointed out that your attack on me was based on something pieguy me to do, pieguy apparently was confused about this, i wanted you to clarify this is actually what you were doing.[/quote]

And that was an derp assumption. Again...

Fhub quote fail

In post 351, zMuffinMan wrote:

wayne wrote:When did I say you v Varsoon was anything but TvT?

what was the point of your varsoon vote if you thought it was TvT the whole time?

That was already answered. How about you go back and read instead of just skimming for shit to misrep and start bad pushes on?

wayne wrote:Don't misrep muffin. Your whole double team on Pie with with Varsoon smacks of buddying. I already said that, so why are you trying to confine my thoughts to one post when that isn't what I said?

er... i pointed out that your attack on me was based on something pieguy

asked

me to do, pieguy apparently was confused about this, i wanted you to clarify this is actually what you were doing.

And that was an derp assumption. Again...

this is why you voted varsoon when you thought he was town?

wayne wrote:You were gloating very much, and I figured that was the easiest way to get your attention.

Yup

ur a vry good player

I make do

Set you up for a win once...

Pie, you around? I want a conversation the two of us about something I think you might have found.

In post 374, waynegg wrote:

In post 333, morph the cat wrote:Hey wayne, you're not doing something I associate with town you. Do you know what it is? And if you do, why aren't you doing it this game?

What? Making every other post mine and calling everybody scum?

Strike one. Try again, hitter.

I am here

In post 373, zMuffinMan wrote:

pieguy wrote:instead of people thinking of it as you buddying him, they'd think of it as you elaborating "because I asked you to".

correct. that's what happened.

that's kind of the point. no one would suspect you of buddying because that is what happened, when your true intent was buddying

In post 373, zMuffinMan wrote:

pieguy wrote:I'm assuming you have a scumread on wayne correct?

no. he's not a town read. i'm still trying to figure out whether he's being derptown or scum.

have you dropped your scum read on varsoon or something?

I'm pretty damn confident in my case on him, but the fact that it seems every single player is going "this is town v town" "Varsoon is town" etc. is making me hesitate a bit.

In post 376, waynegg wrote:That's really bad. Like one of the cardinal types of things you never say, bad. Still like muffin, but damn...

why does that make him scum?

So what did you think about empking's rings mechanic, pie? Do you think town could have won?

In post 386, morph the cat wrote:

In post 374, waynegg wrote:

In post 333, morph the cat wrote:Hey wayne, you're not doing something I associate with town you. Do you know what it is? And if you do, why aren't you doing it this game?

What? Making every other post mine and calling everybody scum?

Strike one. Try again, hitter.

Nope. Run me up. Your loss.

I'm not too sure how it worked, but it was smth like only the person holding the ring could win, but the person holding it could destroy it and make the wincons standard again, right?

in that case, if someone who cared more about teamwork and playing a regular game got it they could destroy it and town could win, yes. if I got it I'd probably destroy it in that case

In post 377, waynegg wrote:

In post 343, morph the cat wrote:

Scum

12. waynegg - Cabd notices a huge aspect of his towngame missing here. ffery has niggles as well.

You're both wrong, btw

for some reason, this post seems like something I have a lot of difficulty seeing town-wayne posting, even though I have no completed games with him @_@

I get the impression that wayne usually doesn't really pay much attention to how other people are reading him and focuses more on what he's doing. so this post seems kind of out of place IMO. someone correct me if I'm wrong about this plz

And what did you think about vox's mechanics?

In post 388, pieguyn wrote:

In post 376, waynegg wrote:That's really bad. Like one of the cardinal types of things you never say, bad. Still like muffin, but damn...

why does that make him scum?

Overemphasis

I don't know what vox is or what the mechanic there was

waynegg wrote:

In post 388, pieguyn wrote:

In post 376, waynegg wrote:That's really bad. Like one of the cardinal types of things you never say, bad. Still like muffin, but damn...

why does that make him scum?

Overemphasis

I don't get it 0.0 can you explain more plz

Okay, how about the mechanic in achievement unlocked? What were your thoughts about that?

I'm new here so I'm not familiar with most of the mechanics that happened, sry >_<

if you can link either of those games tho I can check it out and give an opinion