Mafiascum.net

Nacho,

I would love to have a game where, You didn't make me want to pull my hairs out, but the fact that I want to do it prolly means your town :/

In post 374, Ms Marangal wrote:This game thread has been absolute shit so far, IMO

VOTE: mara

omggggg

Nacho, you're hereeee

and so is orci.

talk to me about that vote, because I don't see where it's coming from especially when You had a recent hydra game with me where I've done nothing BUT complain about shit.

So you think ProHawk's 4 post or w/e seem town?

No

but, I don't think they are coming from scum, either

I also don't think that the lack of reaction is alignment indicative because he would have a reason to freak out over the wagon as both alignments

In post 379, Ms Marangal wrote:talk to me about that vote, because I don't see where it's coming from especially when You had a recent hydra game with me where I've done nothing BUT complain about shit.

I don't try to remember that hydra game

But I think you were somewhat justified in that game considering you had nacho on your butt like 24/7

You don't this game and I think your tone is a bit colder than your town tone

In post 381, Ms Marangal wrote:No

but, I don't think they are coming from scum, either

I also don't think that the lack of reaction is alignment indicative because he would have a reason to freak out over the wagon as both alignments

Have you played with town Prohawk?

And was it a reaction or a lack of reaction? You seem to be saying both.

My complaints had nothing to do with me, orci

and The lack of a reaction isn't indicative of alignment.

having a reaction isn't indicative as well.

and yes, I was town with him in Vi's game

Yeah but how would you characterize ProHawk's posts. Was it a reaction or a lack of reaction?

When bork and I talked about prohawk one of the games of ProHawk's reviewed was Xenologue.

If you haven't ISO'd him in that game and read his first few posts, I recommend it.

Can point you to a couple other games, too.

Lack of a reaction

and, I would rather not Iso him that game because of post game things...

but, yeah I know where you are coming from but why wouldn't he replicate that as scum?

If you don't believe my lack of time to invest, do some research.

I actually don't like Nacho's push on me. I don't like his use of his "reknown" to get people to work with him. He is voting me on lack of conviction and a poor reaction to my being run up... ok.

In post 251, Nachomamma8 wrote: THIS is your reaction to the flashwagon on you? No diatribes on why everyone sheeping me is a bad idea and shows incredible scum motivation, no rage and anger on how you can't believe that the town is this lazy and horrible? And hell, even lacking that, no analysis and instead easy obvious scumreads? Come on, hawkie.

You're a much better player than this.

Thats funny Nacho cause all of those things you listed, (My diatribes) were not what anyone in the games I had played in considered to be "good play". Don't get me wrong, again I will re-iterate, I don't have time to go through and make lengthy posts and spend a crap-ton of time on the game. You want to kill me for not being super-active? Do it, but make sure you kill the scum taking the cop-out-excuse to lynch someone for it.

VOTE: Nacho

Oh and Nacho, get over yourself. I have yet to see any game-changing moves from you. You are overrated.

No

Pedit: loool, Mac. I think we are on the same page for once

In post 354, pitoli wrote:^ When I played with Scum-Kaze he was very conscientious of addressing stuff like that and in general played a pretty clean game, always providing a rationale for voting with cases and such. Then again that was his first game on site, so I don't really know if I'd expect that now.

this is the problem i'm having with ffery's meta-dive. i do actually have a slight town-lean on kaze now for his nonchalance about the thread so far, but i feel his scum game probably isn't going to be similar to his original scum games.

In post 391, Ms Marangal wrote:No

Pedit: loool, Mac. I think we are on the same page for once

once in a blue moon it happens

i think that vote was terrible, and so is tammy's. tammy's needs more explanation, but looks like it's coming from a townhead. what do you think?

also a side note, my activity may drop slightly because the weather conditions at the moment are absolutely shocking, and the village is being threatened by flooding. hopefully not.

In post 389, ProHawk wrote: You want to kill me for not being super-active? Do it, but make sure you kill the scum taking the cop-out-excuse to lynch someone for it.

VOTE: Nacho

this implies to me you're not scumreading nacho, yet the vote says different.

I think both Nacho votes are coming from town

In post 394, Mac wrote:

In post 389, ProHawk wrote: You want to kill me for not being super-active? Do it, but make sure you kill the scum taking the cop-out-excuse to lynch someone for it.

VOTE: Nacho

this implies to me you're not scumreading nacho, yet the vote says different.

Nope. Scum-Nacho.

Why would town-nacho need to poison the well?

In post 306, The Rufflig wrote:It was a pointless push.

I had already stated that I was going to reconsider Prohawk today.

In post 181, The Rufflig wrote:All right, I can wait until tomorrow.

How did you interpret my request that (someone) unvote prohawk? Furthermore, what is your current read on him?

In post 395, Ms Marangal wrote:I think both Nacho votes are coming from town

What specifically gave you a townread on prohawk?