Mafiascum.net

In post 373, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Is call confbias.and no.

Ughhhhh

You haven't really done any scumhunting since your last vote on me. Unless you have proof otherwise?

No h not. You ar wcumy. Nd unfotjnaly he is not.

[Invot]

Pedy ru fuckng kisnj g me????

Im no playon fight now. Im gojn to go play skyp magia.

Go home

You're drunk

I'm not buying this drunk act.

*Reads ETL's forum posts*

...

I may have contributed to your drunken state.

Part of me wants to think your supposedly drunken posts here are a deliberate distraction. If it isn't, though, then it looks as though you find DBK Scummy, me not Scummy, and have unvoted me.

...the most you'll get from me right now on your "state" is the admission that you might actually be drunk.

As for you, DBK, I'll respond to you later. Now that I have some time freed up, I find myself very... able... in hunting Scum.

Hunting other scum or tunneling me further?

False dilemma.

Hunting Scum.

UNVOTE:

wa attthe bar.phonepost iswors. i'm ntTHt waste.d willchkcthis later.

In post 380, Wake1 wrote:False dilemma.

Hunting Scum.

Let me know how that goes.

@ Wake - which statement of mine regarding Aptil did you not understand? I actually like the ISO you did on me, the conclusion you did gives me a fairly strong town read for you. I, too, often rely on objective tells such as your prod-dodge annoyance for finding scum. It's never anything particularly solid for lynching someone, but it helps me diagnose players a bit more.

So besides DBK's sheeping of ETL, what else have we got on him that's lynch-worthy?

In post 383, Mr_Blonde wrote:@ Wake - which statement of mine regarding Aptil did you not understand? I actually like the ISO you did on me, the conclusion you did gives me a fairly strong town read for you. I, too, often rely on objective tells such as your prod-dodge annoyance for finding scum. It's never anything particularly solid for lynching someone, but it helps me diagnose players a bit more.

So besides DBK's sheeping of ETL, what else have we got on him that's lynch-worthy?

^^This guy gets it.

But Blonde you're gonna need to say some more stuff to be considered actually playing.

I understand. I'll get more into the game as it progresses and my schedule tapers off a bit.

I'm not going to apologize for being busy. I need to check the last VC and see where the votes are placed currently. Who is your top scum read?

Zebe. Opportunistic vote, inventing more reasons to vote me than needed to try justifying his vote.

And then Wake for tunneling and believing everything in my ISO is a scumtell, dragging on discussions about other things instead I making conclusions, also inventing his own scumtells that don't work anyway.

The last scum is probably a lurker, unless there are only 2 scum. I need to check the setup again.

Okay yeah three scum, I thought so.

I'm guessing the last scum is in {Kalimar, Mr_Blonde, Aptil, KBW} because all three scum being active right now? Unlikely. I also don't really have a scum read on any more active players.

In post 330, anorway wrote:

Deadline: (expired on 2014-01-02 16:00:00)

With 13 alive it takes 7 to lynch.

Vote Count 1.5

[L-7] Keybladewielder
[L-7] Mr_Blonde
[L-7] Zebe
[L-7] Cheery Dog
[L-7] Smudger
[L-7] EspeciallyTheLies
[L-7] BBmolla
[L-6]

Lucky2u

: gamsimbre
[L-7] Kalimar
[L-7] gamsimbre
[L-5]

aptil

: Mr_Blonde, BBmolla
[L-2]

Does Bo Know

: Cheery Dog, Wake88, Smudger, Zebe, Lucky
[L-4]

Wake88

: aptil, Kalimar, Does Bo Know

Not voting (1): Keybladewielder

Alright, so I added the votes/unvotes after nabbing this. I don't think I missed any. You say your top 3 are Wake, Zebe and one of me/Kalimar/Aptil/KBW. I'll ISO those other 3 but as I stated earlier with my vote on Aptil that I found him attacking Lucky for his dice-roller thing a bit opportunistic so by association that would put Lucky in my null-Town list and Aptil in my null-scum list. So we agree there that Aptil could be scum... but that doesn't exactly coincide with his current vote on Wake who is another scum read of yours.

Did Aptil even have a reason for that vote?

Yeah Aptil needs to get here.

Actually Blonde I'm pretty positive my vote's on Zebe.

In post 340, Wake1 wrote:OK, I've got a gut feeling. I'm going to entertain the idea.

What if ETL is Town, and DBK is Scum? Say DBK knows ETL as Town is a threat, so he keeps sheeping/buddying/following her. The reason he would do that as Scum is that, should he be lynched while ETL is alive, he would have made it seem that ETL was his partner, when she wasn't.

Please share your thoughts on this.

I think it's dumb

In post 349, Zebe wrote:I've changed my opinions about my town reads I mentioned back there. I'm pretty sure there is at least one scum among DBK, Wake, ETL and BB.

Uh

why?

In post 391, BBmolla wrote:

In post 340, Wake1 wrote:OK, I've got a gut feeling. I'm going to entertain the idea.

What if ETL is Town, and DBK is Scum? Say DBK knows ETL as Town is a threat, so he keeps sheeping/buddying/following her. The reason he would do that as Scum is that, should he be lynched while ETL is alive, he would have made it seem that ETL was his partner, when she wasn't.

Please share your thoughts on this.

I think it's dumb

Pretty much.

In my experience I feel it's more common for scum to allow Townies to buddy them for the associative tell near end-game in the event they are lynched. Not the reverse. With that said, ETL calling out DBK for his sheeping/buddying gives me a town lean. DBK acknowledging this as well makes me feel better about him.

^^^^THIS guy knows what's up.

Are you trying to prove my point right now?

In post 387, Does Bo Know wrote:Zebe. Opportunistic vote, inventing more reasons to vote me than needed to try justifying his vote.

And then Wake for tunneling and believing everything in my ISO is a scumtell, dragging on discussions about other things instead I making conclusions, also inventing his own scumtells that don't work anyway.

The last scum is probably a lurker, unless there are only 2 scum. I need to check the setup again.

Zebe might be accurate

Wake still looks like confirmation bias/dumb town to me

Zebe + 2 in the lurkers seems more likely.

Zebe randomly saying one of top 4 posters is scum and then voting one is scummy as shit.

In post 8, aptil wrote:VOTE: Wake . This is a nice beginning .

In post 121, aptil wrote:#98 is so bad Lucky . There is enough content for you to comment on . Instead you go and do a random vote .

Aptil's ISO.

As I said earlier, him attacking Lucky for his dice-roller vote was pretty lame considering his ONLY other post was a RVS on Wake early on. Looks like scum jumping onto the easy bandwagon, I'm sure you all remember how quickly Wake made it to L-1/2 (whichever it was)

I like my vote here.

Aptil + Zebe + X