m4yhem wrote:Chaotic- I think you were trying to think of a way to prevent the cop from being revived altogether, and the stalling was just to give you thinking time. That quote don’t mean a thing; the point is you made little effort to work out if Zindaras was lying; you made no arguments against him, you asked him no questions. As for the sanity issue, how exactly were you planning to work out his sanity without reviving him? I still don’t buy it.
You accuse me of stalling for other purposes, I want you to back it up. "I think" doesn't prove anything.
Is this right? The quote means nothing? Want to provide reasons for that? My point was that you failed to be attentive and asked questions that were already answered. Don't go onto a different point.
I
stated
that I believed his claim, but I demanded to know if he knew of any limitations to his role. You're theory is a bunch of crap since there's no point in making an argument against someone who you believe to be cop. In addition, you can obtain information in more than one way. Why do I have to ask a question? Isn't demanding it good enough? IMO, if you asked for the same information, then wouldn't that mean I demanded for meaningful information?
IMO, if we have a sanity issue, there will be another cop. We can have that cop fix the situation. If you want a direct approach, then I'd say we test his sanity by making him investigate a possible person who may be confirmed in the future. However, I don't like directing the cop and there are plenty of other variables to mess things up.
m4yhem wrote:As for the Sherlock-should-make-his-own-arguments thing; wow, you actually have a point there. The problem is that waiting is really boring, and so I fill the time by speculating.
That's a crappy way to refute my point. If you think it's a good point, don't try to cover it up with BS.
m4yhem wrote:At this stage in would be really nice to hear from the man himself, i.e. Sherlock. But since he’s nonresponsive, let’s talk amongst ourselves some more.
WOW. I've been stating that for what? The entire freakin day?!
Why are some people convinced that scum will be able to kill tonight? They are given a randomly generated number, so balance issues don't play into it. It's completely random.
Aside from that, I think reviving either the RB or the doc is just taking a gamble. The doc revival forces scum to kill the doc, revealing their presence. However, we lose the doc, a powerful role.
The RB revival can possibly locate and prevent a scum. It actually tells us who is scum if the RB is succesful. However, it's a gamble and we don't know if he blocked right if we don't have a prior scum kill. No NK doesn't mean anything since scum could still be on delay or that we don't even know if scum is alive yet.
So reviving the doc is more 'generalized' and 'insured' while the RB is more 'specific' and 'chance.'