Is that mainly due to what you were arguing at 331, or something else? Hunches are fine, but it's better to try and zero in on what's bugging you if you can.
Posted: Thu Jun 09, 2016 5:59 pm
by Sickofit1138
In post 373, mhsmith0 wrote:1) @sick: do you agree with what zyf said in 358 about what you were saying about vandit-fox?
2) Wrt FOX's rb speculation, I'm not sure I really have an opinion about whether it points to anything spec wise. It's possible ranger was the mafias desired kill, whether due to ineffectual pr hunting, generic fear kill of the IC (I've played with ranger only once, and she was Mafia, but I was quite impressed and I think she has a rep as a very good town player), her specific reads, or something else entirely.
3) anyone have anything else they want to talk about pre claim?
Nah he hit it on the head.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 1:45 am
by Raskolnikov
V/LA till sunday.
Want to see fox catchup by then so don't quickhammer.
Vandit PR softing is unsurprising. He's likely getting lynched anyways so idk if people want to CC him here if he hardclaims.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 2:55 am
by Zyf
In post 377, Raskolnikov wrote:V/LA till sunday.
Want to see fox catchup by then so don't quickhammer.
Vandit PR softing is unsurprising. He's likely getting lynched anyways so idk if people want to CC him here if he hardclaims.
I think we should discuss it before we decide to get a CC. We may be able to figure out he's lying without having to CC.
If we lynch and he flips mafia after a cc we're likely down a valuable PR. If he claims doctor it's easier to CC then if he claims cop/tracker, due to WIFOM strats.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 7:21 am
by mhsmith0
I think that we should all agree not to have any quick CC's against anything Vandit claims. Beyond that I'd rather not discuss the specifics of what should be countered and why until after he actually claims.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:02 am
by Zyf
In post 379, mhsmith0 wrote:I think that we should all agree not to have any quick CC's against anything Vandit claims. Beyond that I'd rather not discuss the specifics of what should be countered and why until after he actually claims.
I suppose you're right.
Well, see you guys after vandit claims.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:03 am
by beeboy
Depends what Vandit claims.
If he claims BP we are lynching him.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:09 am
by mhsmith0
1) Let's not discuss CC'ing until after claim
2) Let's not discuss what kind of claim might be more or less believable until after claim
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:33 am
by Zyf
1) Vandit, we're waiting on you
2) How long are we planning on waiting for this claim? Monday?
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:40 am
by mhsmith0
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 11:41 am
by mhsmith0
FWIW, games on this site are usually a good deal livelier than this one has been the last few days.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:53 pm
by Zyf
In post 385, mhsmith0 wrote:FWIW, games on this site are usually a good deal livelier than this one has been the last few days.
I think that's due to the fact that we're waiting to hear Vandit's claim and there's nothing else to talk about.
And we could easily lynch vandit anyway
this is slowwwww
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 12:55 pm
by mhsmith0
yeah basically my point. this game state is unusual, so please don't think it's usually like this.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 3:15 pm
by Sickofit1138
Honestly can we just hammer him?
There is no way he is PR lets face it.
Posted: Fri Jun 10, 2016 4:28 pm
by mhsmith0
Might as well give him the chance though. 24 hour notice of intent to vote, EVEN IF IT IS A HAMMER. Defend and/or claim in that time period. If anyone here thinks I should give more than 24 hours, I'm willing to discuss an extension, but only with good reason.
