In post 361, Transcend wrote:I'm not saying he
WOULD
get lolhammered i'm saying he
COULD
get lolhammered.
::Checks thread to see if he is in Road to Rome and forgot...::
In post 363, Tenshii wrote:Line 1- THATS THE WHOLE POINT. YOU think that it's illogical to interpret it that way. But then Karnos is trying to bring up how Io is doing the same thing to Karnos (This is shown in the quote below)
The difference being - Karnos agrees he was attacking me (sorta) he just also claims other attacks.
His lesson was derp terrible because he made up something while ignoring that I directly explained my answer as something else entirely.
In post 363, Tenshii wrote:Line 2/3 - But he did answer your question. (This is shown in the quote below)
So we're going with the answer; Thor is scummy for not having a scum read by Page 3?
Eh...if he wants to marry to that logic I guess he can.
It seems insane as a concept though.
In post 363, Tenshii wrote:The last line - The actual answer. "So no, It doesn't make sense that at a point in the game where many players have posted several posts outside of RVS, you only have a read on one of them. And further, it doesn't logically follow that your town read is necessarily reading anyone else accurately." AKA he's saying that there's been so much information posted already, why do you only have a read on one person? Why wouldn't you have a scum read? And how do you even know that town read is scum reading anyone else accurately?
Okay, so let's break down his statement here - he claims many players have posted outside the RVS, so it's strange I don't have multiple reads.
Let's look at all the players who expressed reads before I did outside RVS.
KTS in #43 *might* be serious in voting Troubador for RQS.
Troubador in #47 assuredly gives a town read that is outside RVS.
Troubador in #49 assuredly gives a scumread.
Thor in #55 gives a town read.
So, the "many" is...what, two?
The possible reads are...three?
Let's even add on a player and add on a read on the presumption you think RVS ended sooner than the rather generous end I gave it. I'm assuredly amongst the first five players to offer even a single serious read in the game. I would suggest I'm in the first two to three.
That means that if I'm scummy for only having one read at that point.
Then Karnos is also scummy - because he hasn't expressed any reads.
While we're at it, everyon other than Troubador only seems to have one read at that point - so all of them are as exactly as scummy as me if Karnos thinks I'm scummy for what he's calling out.
Who else did he call scummy for this tell?
Checking...coming up with...none....zero...zip...
Does that make sense to you?
Do you think this is honest logic on his part?
Or can you agree with me he is spewing gak - because he is absolutely spewing BS and you are lapping it up right now like it makes sense.
In post 363, Tenshii wrote:Also even if he weren't teaching a lesson, his Line 2 makes sense to me. I don't get the logic at all on depending a townREAD's read on another person. You don't know for sure your READ is town so chooing to bandwagon that READ's read over your own personal read doesn't make sense.
It does if I don't have a scum read - which I openly said at the time.
I had a town read.
the town read had advanced a serious scum read.
I guess I could have just sat on an RVS and twaddled about - or I could, y'know, support a town read in RVS. I don't get the logic of doing anything other than what I did.
In post 373, PhantomCobalt wrote:Transcend why are you pushing me about something that won't happen?
And temporarily unvote? I think karnos is town, this unvote is permanent unless my read on him changes
VOTE: Transcend for bad logic
If you're voting Transcend for lack of logic (and I could see that)
How can you be okay with Karnos, who is assuredly also lacking in logic? What makes the logic flaws better/worse between them?
