(a) You can't be this dense are you? It was a dynamic read of the game, I posted the interesting positive and negative things I saw and then in the end I decided what I felt mattered more. And unlike you I'm not interested in selling my narrative to the exclusion of all else, I'm interested in truth so yeah, there are both positive and negatives for some people. And maybe it was a little under explained but that's because I hate long posts and because it was supposed to be the beginning of things, not the end-all be-all.In post 370, copper223 wrote:(a)There is no misrep in stating that what you said about the players you were reading doesn't match the reads you came up with at the end (in fact you partially admit it yourself by later claiming that was not a "serious case" on someone, an accusation by the way which I never made in the first place).
My points about your catch-up are still the same:
(b)-You ignore GL although you end up voting for the same player.
(c)- You don't give me the impression you were scum-reading Jae.
(d)- What you cite with regards to Drealmer can only be interpreted as a joke but then you put him as top town.
(b+c) GL had like two posts, they weren't especially interesting. I voted with him because it was the only serious vote placed on someone on my "willing to lynch" list see my "checking the vote count" line.
(d) Now you're getting it.
