Page 16 of 21

Posted: Wed Oct 05, 2016 5:38 pm
by hinanawiscarlet
No, I did not mean that scum must know at the start of the day. They could've just discussed it on N2, coupled with PP's interesting comment.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 1:38 am
by Icy
In post 331, Accountant wrote:Currently two scum remain alive -
I think Icy and Shadow are town, which means Black and Scarlet must be scum, the dirty connivers.


No matter who you think is scum, please don't make a vote yet. This is LyLo, and there's really no benefit to voting someone.
In post 334, Accountant wrote:
In post 332, BlackVoid wrote:Saying I'm scum with Scarlet is odd given I've been pushing him most of the game. Scarlet probably is scum though and I'm not sure who the partner is so I'm going to have to look over interactions.

@Scarlet, why did you vote Huntress when you said that Accountant was more suspicious?
Okay, let's lynch Scarlet together. Maybe I'm wrong about you.
Accountant I'm growing more and more uncomfortable with you. One hour after "Black must be Scum" you claim you were maybe wrong about him. At that point who was Scarlets partner?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:16 am
by Accountant
Scarlet is definitely scum, but BlackVois's eagerness to lynch her surprised me, hence the "maybe I'm wrong about you comment". The other possibility is Shadow-Scarlet. Either way, Scarlet is scum.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:16 am
by Accountant
Investigating the possibility of Shadow-Void but gut says nk

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 3:16 am
by Accountant
no*

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:23 am
by mhsmith0
Votecount 3.02Image

Not voting (5)
BlackVoid, hinanawiscarlet, Icy, Shadowlancerx, Accountant

Deadline is on Monday, October 17th: (expired on 2016-10-17 20:00:00)

With 5 alive, it's 3 to lynch!
[/size]

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:23 am
by Shadowlancerx
In post 376, Icy wrote:
In post 331, Accountant wrote:Currently two scum remain alive -
I think Icy and Shadow are town, which means Black and Scarlet must be scum, the dirty connivers.


No matter who you think is scum, please don't make a vote yet. This is LyLo, and there's really no benefit to voting someone.
In post 334, Accountant wrote:
In post 332, BlackVoid wrote:Saying I'm scum with Scarlet is odd given I've been pushing him most of the game. Scarlet probably is scum though and I'm not sure who the partner is so I'm going to have to look over interactions.

@Scarlet, why did you vote Huntress when you said that Accountant was more suspicious?
Okay, let's lynch Scarlet together. Maybe I'm wrong about you.
Accountant I'm growing more and more uncomfortable with you. One hour after "Black must be Scum" you claim you were maybe wrong about him. At that point who was Scarlets partner?
I'm inclined to answer that question with "Accountant, Accountant is Scarlet's partner." Either that or Accountant's soft clear of Blackvoid indicates that they are partners, but either way, I think it's Accountant. I'm a little disheartened that that large post I made was basically swept under the rug by Accountant replying to one part of it.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:34 am
by Accountant
What part, Shadow? And why the hell are you disheartened if you think I'n scum? You should be like "I knew it! Accountant is scum and THIS PROVES IT" not "woe is me, accountant didn't respond"

Let's wrap this up, please.

VOTE: Scarlet

If I am town and Scarlet is also town scum will quickhammer. I am going to sleep now. If there's no game over when I wake up then it's either me or scarlet.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:41 am
by Shadowlancerx
I'm disheartened because I know it, and everyone has just seemed wishy washy today.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:48 am
by Accountant
Not really - at least two others have said they think I'm scum, which is enough for a lynch today.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 4:54 am
by Shadowlancerx
I guess I just don't see the fire in their posts that I feel. But you do have a point. We will see soon enough.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:00 am
by Accountant
I just ISOed you and found the post I "ignored". I did the opposite of sweeping it under the rug - I only focused on the bits that actually said I was scum. Nevertheless, you seem to want me to respond to it in full, so I'll do so.
Posts 114 and 116 were the first examples; in 114 he openly tried to lead blackvoid to an icy vote, and if he and void are scumbuddies, this reads as more menacing. In 116, you respond to a pretty well thought out post by Icy by saying that everything Icy said was a lie, thus carrying on his attack without needing to actually respond to the post.
Post 184 is terrifying, because he openly admits that he doesn't mind a derphammer on Huntress, which doesn't sit right with me, and it shouldn't for any town player. Derphammers make the day end, and that deprives a huge amount of potential information from the town, and generally just makes the game favor a Mafia win. Post 187 follows this with a call for trust, but the issue of a quick hammer isn't about trust, it's about what's good for town. Post 224 Accountant: "If Huntress flips town, I want everyone to lynch me tomorrow." This feels like reverse psychology, almost put here so that you could say later "why would scumAccountant say this?" With the answer being, because it works as a way to clear him. Doing the opposite of what we would expect so that we trip up and he gets away with it. Posts 256/261 are subtle, but show a sense of gloating, he didn't answer because he had Huntress at his mercy.
In 114 I thought Icy was scum. Hence, leading BV to vote Icy isn't scummy.

116, I meant what I said. I challenged Icy to prove me wrong, and if any of his arguments had any substantiation whatsoever he would have done so.

184, Huntress was confirmed scum in my eyes, so talking more about whether or not she was scum was useless to me. Talking about who her partner is is impossible when people are arguing about the first point and yelling about preflip associatives. Lynch her, let her flip red, sort everything out, then go into D3 and we can think about who her partner is. That was my thought process.

Post 187, see above.

Post 224, already addressed. You claim I was setting up "why would accountant say this?", but the first thing out of my mouth was "that was all a fucking lie".

251: Why wouldn't town gloat upon lynching their strongest scumread?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:00 am
by Accountant
You aren't exactly a firebrand yourself shadow

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 5:05 am
by Shadowlancerx
In post 387, Accountant wrote:You aren't exactly a firebrand yourself shadow
No, I'm chronically unsure of every read I make. I really want to be though.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:23 am
by BlackVoid
Okay, so three possibilities:

If Accountant and Scarlet are scum, Accountant has to be bussing for cred during 5P. Icy is the obvious nk so it would have to be between me, Shadow, and Accountant for the final three and it wouldn't hurt to get cred. Scarlet's vote on Huntress was actually really, really weird. After expressing suspicion of Accountant multiple times, he all of a sudden votes Shadow over Accountant when the latter suggests a 1v1 so hard to rule this out.

Accountant and Shadowlancer don't make that much sense given Shadowlancer was pretty set on pushing Accountant D2 when if he succeeded, that would make Huntress look amazing and impossible to mislynch. That play would be directly against the scum wincon so I'm mostly ruling this out.

Shadowlancer and Scarlet don't have any significant interactions. I could see Shadow pushing Accountant hoping that Icy votes him so that his partner Scarlet doesn't get lynched. If this is the team, all three of me, Accountant, and Icy would need to agree that Scarlet is scum so it's possible that he's trying to deflect.

This overall just re-inforces my suspicion on Scarlet. It's hard to see Accountant/Shadow being a pairing here. Subsequently, it's hard to see Scarlet being town. Individually, Scarlet is the scummiest player in the game so that's where my vote is likely going to go once I re-read and double-check everything.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:32 am
by Shadowlancerx
I still think Accountant is the better lynch for today, especially since you could be his partner. Accountant-scarlet does make sense, but I won't rule out you doing the bussing here. I'm going to try and reread later today as well.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:35 am
by BlackVoid
Bussing who? Accountant? Or Scarlet?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 6:38 am
by Shadowlancerx
If accountant here is truly town, then you're bussing scarlet.
Alternatively, you're town and really considering what's going on.
Or, you're pushing a mislynch and partnered with Accountant.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:10 am
by Icy
Any scum paring would have discussed today during night, and be willing to throw their partner under the bus if things started looked bad.

I don't share Accountants need to rush this along.

Also if I were scum (given the pool of townees last night) I would have night killed Accountant. Did anyone see something in Penguin's posts that made him look like a PR?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 7:17 am
by BlackVoid
I agree that ruling out Accountant/Scarlet is premature. But Shadow spent a lot of time D2 pushing Accountant when he could have gone for Huntress which makes that pair really unlikely, and to me, it makes Scarlet being town highly improbable. Why bus his partner D2 with no PRs outed? He'd have to make it through alone shooting in the dark, and with a Huntress mislynch being very unlikely.

Who are your best guesses for Accountant's partner?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:11 am
by hinanawiscarlet
In post 393, Icy wrote:
Also if I were scum (given the pool of townees last night) I would have night killed Accountant. Did anyone see something in Penguin's posts that made him look like a PR?
No, I think scum wouldn't kill Accountant, as he might get lynched the next day for his "If I'm wrong, lynch me." But of course that didn't happen today.

That confidence of Accountant also what sparks my suspicions on him.

However, as I reread Huntress' posts, I found it weird that she would suddenly votes for Icy. The only reason I can think of is because almost half of the players trusted PP's accident banhammer through phone, so she sheeps Icy, trying to mislynch him. And that, in my opinion, makes a far sensible scumtell

Also, no tracking log from our tracker?

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:41 am
by Icy
Scum Shadow at the time of his vote was the second vote on Accountant. If Accountant got a third Shadow could have just unvoted.

Not sure if townee Shadow was voting Accountant because he really believed Account was scum. He could have voted there just so he wouldn't be accused of sheeping Penguin.

No idea ....yet

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 9:56 am
by Icy
I will say this. Accountant said earlier, something to the effect of a scum team wouldn't vote the same person back to back. He then said this morning the team was likely Black,Scarlet. If you look back at the day one lynch Black's slot and Scarlet are the one/two votes on Bliss.

Just sayin

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:02 am
by Icy
In post 395, hinanawiscarlet wrote:
In post 393, Icy wrote:
Also if I were scum (given the pool of townees last night) I would have night killed Accountant. Did anyone see something in Penguin's posts that made him look like a PR?
No, I think scum wouldn't kill Accountant, as he might get lynched the next day for his "If I'm wrong, lynch me." But of course that didn't happen today.

That confidence of Accountant also what sparks my suspicions on him.

However, as I reread Huntress' posts, I found it weird that she would suddenly votes for Icy. The only reason I can think of is because almost half of the players trusted PP's accident banhammer through phone, so she sheeps Icy, trying to mislynch him. And that, in my opinion, makes a far sensible scumtell

Also, no tracking log from our tracker?
Believe me if my tracking log showed anything, I'd be standing on a chair screaming it.

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2016 10:08 am
by BlackVoid
Upon re-read, got a question for Shadowlancer: you were willing to put Huntress at L-1 before Accountant turned it into a 1v1. So, after he did, why did you decide to go ahead with an Accountant vote because you were worried he was leading you on? Wouldn't it make more sense to lynch Huntress and if he was wrong, go after him next?