Page 16 of 41

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:19 am
by GuyInFreezer
In post 373, Sesq wrote:Okay

VOTE: mikan

let's consolidate here.

annoying and non-contributive. let's pile em up boys
wtf don't get distracted by shiny things
In post 374, RedFlavor wrote:VOTE: mikan


I am just bored and this player's tone is suspicious so I'm voting her
this player's tone is suspicious so I'm voting her
this player's tone is suspicious
suspicious
This guy is literally using random words to lynch the low hanging fruit.

Is Mikan useless? Yes.
Trolling? Certainly?
But suspicious? Hell no.

Why are we not lynching this yet

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:39 am
by GuyInFreezer
In post 354, Sky_Paladin wrote:Do you have any thoughts on other players? Namely, you are currently voting RedFlavor so for you to pick out this one thing seems odd.
This is a very easy question to answer tbh but hey I'll still let him answer.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:41 am
by GuyInFreezer
In post 365, Hawk wrote:I voted NM because it seemed like progress on mumble and RedFlavor wasn't going anywhere...
Pls vote RF.
In post 368, Iconeum wrote:About RedFlavour:

'Hey guys i'm reading this slot as scum but i don't want to pressure it so I'll just vote elsewhere'.
feels like a defense of what I originally read as a joke.
'Oh it wouldn't be as much pressure as I thought and i'm being called out for it, so i'd better switch there now'.

Yo Red, if you thought I made weird looking posts, why didn't you call me out yourself?

is a lie: Red didn't think NM was at L-1, he literally said he didn't want to bring NM to L-1. See .

I'd vote Red over Hawk 100% of the time here.
Hey you too.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:42 am
by GuyInFreezer
Oh btw I forgot to mention this
In post 373, Sesq wrote:Okay

VOTE: mikan

let's consolidate here.

annoying and non-contributive. let's pile em up boys
We
are
not
f*ing
policy lynching
in
multiball

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:45 am
by GuyInFreezer
Bring Tael here
Tell him to read RF's iso
and put that vote to where it belongs.

@N_M let's lynch RF pls

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:47 am
by GuyInFreezer
Maybe if there are 6 votes on a wagon someone will lolhammer

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 9:48 am
by Not_Mafia
VOTE: RF

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:32 am
by Iconeum
Ill catch up in the morning. L1? Intent to hammer rf

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 10:34 am
by GuyInFreezer
wtf no you get back here and vote rf

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 1:40 pm
by Sesq
suspicious is a buzzword but i understand

why would you type like that if you weren't trying to obfuscate?

it's for the memes. it's the memes. she's a meme player. pass.

VOTE: rf

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 1:42 pm
by Beefster
VOTE: Sesq

for backtracking... ish.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:02 pm
by GuyInFreezer
In post 385, Beefster wrote:VOTE: Sesq

for backtracking... ish.
Sir your vote is in the wrong place.
Please fix it and vote RF asap.
Thank you.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:04 pm
by GuyInFreezer
In post 385, Beefster wrote:VOTE: Sesq

for backtracking... ish.
If what he did was a backtracking, then it was a good backtracking.
He literally voted Mikan as a policy lynch.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:05 pm
by Hawk
VOTE: RF

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:08 pm
by Hawk
That was 5 votes btw so L-2

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:09 pm
by GuyInFreezer
L-2!

For those who grumbled about RF wagon not gaining traction, you're welcome.

Now we just need 2 more.

P-Edit: Indeed.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:10 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Well, actually, 1 more.

We already have someone intending to hammer.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:11 pm
by Beefster
In post 386, GuyInFreezer wrote:
In post 385, Beefster wrote:VOTE: Sesq

for backtracking... ish.
Sir your vote is in the wrong place.
Please fix it and vote RF asap.
Thank you.
Uhmm... So now I'm supposed to sheep you?

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:12 pm
by GuyInFreezer
That would be fantastic.

You can always ISO RF to convince yourself if that's the way you prefer.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:12 pm
by Beefster
Maybe I'll hammer after RF claims.

I need to evaluate this for myself.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:13 pm
by GuyInFreezer
Tbh that Mikan vote is enough as a case

That Mikan vote was

1. very opportunistic
2. with BS reasoning
3. going with a flow of "Mikan is being useless"

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:14 pm
by GuyInFreezer
I mean, sure, Mikan could be scum.
But this is multiball after all.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:15 pm
by Beefster
Yup. Hammer after claim. Unless RF says something that somehow redeems him.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:15 pm
by Beefster
Which I find unlikely tbh.

But I believe in the botd.

Posted: Mon Feb 19, 2018 2:17 pm
by GuyInFreezer
I mean at this point literally only thing that will work in his favor is if he claims doctor.
Which I won't believe 100%.