Mafiascum.net

Labyrinth Mafia - Votecount 1.16:

The Worst (3): WhemeStar, Shoshin, Reality Check
Princess of Renais (2): Joral, TehBrawlGuy
Shoshin (2): ArcAngel9, TPFKAP
WhemeStar (2): The Worst
TPFKAP (1): Vartsun
ArcAngel9 (1): Riku
Joral (0):
Reality Check (0):
Nancy Drew 39 (0):
Scioness Sajj (0):
Vartsun (0):
TehBrawlGuy (0):
NicoRobin (0):
Riku (0):
Creature (0):


Not voting: Nancy Drew 39, NicoRobin, Creature, Scioness Sajj, Princess of Renais

With 15 alive it's 8 to lynch.

The day will end at (expired on 2018-06-07 15:00:00).


Note that the edits no the previous pages were to fix the page # alignment since I deleted a previous post.

In post 374, Reality Check wrote:

In post 372, the worst wrote:So..... Don't have townreads because they could be scum and don't have scumreaes because they could be town

Fuck it let's just random lynch ^~^

VOTE: the worst

What was the purpose of your 370??

The purpose of it was exactly what I said in that post, that effort by itself is NAI.

Why did you feel the need to misrep it into me saying you shouldn't have reads?

because it doesn't feel town motivated shooting down the only person who seems to be putting in the effort to vocalise strong reads for discussion!

if you disagree with some of his reads vocalise it? like sitting back spewing armchair mafia logic is not gonna help us advance the game state even remotely. it encourages regression before progress.

If people read my posts consistently, I'm not just basing my thoughts off surface level shit that has no relevance; I genuinely do perceive my scumreads by coming from a scum mentality and that's not SPECIFICALLY rooted in their level of effort or amount they're posting.

And honestly, even if it weren't - that's more of a reason than what quite a few people are giving, but nobody talks about that.

This wagon is atrocious and I'll respond in a more tactful and factually based manner when I'm not going to potentially fill the thread with rage caps AND ALSO IF people want to actually engage with my reads.

see I did my votecounts I'm a responsible gamemod(tm)

Because it's a way of reading people that isn't effective longer term? That's a reach out to Taly for him to restructure how he's getting reads because I'm seeing a lot of townreads for effort and scumreads for lack of effort, which is fine for getting people to contribute more, but significantly less accurate when you're trying to lynch actual scum.

In post 381, Reality Check wrote:Because it's a way of reading people that isn't effective longer term? That's a reach out to Taly for him to restructure how he's getting reads because I'm seeing a lot of townreads for effort and scumreads for lack of effort, which is fine for getting people to contribute more, but significantly less accurate when you're trying to lynch actual scum.

Talk abt reads you disagree with rather than general mafia theory I double dare you

Tfw the Princess has the best reason out of any one on my wagon

but i never vot
itsa modo error

In post 379, Vartsun wrote:

At what point have I made reads and thought OR even gave the impression that:

"Yay! I'm just going to slap a read on this person because they're TRYING."

If people read my posts consistently, I'm not just basing my thoughts off surface level shit that has no relevance; I genuinely do perceive my scumreads by coming from a scum mentality and that's not SPECIFICALLY rooted in their level of effort or amount they're posting.

And honestly, even if it weren't - that's more of a reason than what quite a few people are giving, but nobody talks about that.

This

the worst

wagon is atrocious and I'll respond in a more tactful and factually based manner when I'm not going to potentially fill the thread with rage caps AND ALSO IF people want to actually engage with my reads.

~ Taly

These are the impressions I got this from, plus I got a very similar feeling from your very first post in this thread.

In post 356, Vartsun wrote:

tgkfap

is borderline scumclaiming with how poor their posts have been, and LITERALLY BELIEVE THAT THIS IS

VARSOON

WHEN I'VE DONE ALL THE POSTING.

Really doubting that this is

Creature's

towngame. His only gamesolving-centered post so far has been 334 and it literally comes to no conclusion at all.

Pushing

the worst

is the worst thing you could possibly do right now because he's near locktown solely due to his sensibility being higher than most of the playerlist's right now.

worst

Why does your tone feel really really off this game?

In post 385, Princess of Renais wrote:but i never vot
itsa modo error

exactly

Reality Check wrote:worst

Why does your tone feel really really off this game?

because I don't think you've played with me actually giving a fuck about a game yet

Anka there is no world where you know me well enough to correctly toneread me as scum. This is my disappointed irritated tone!!

I think I'd have to mindmeld with mastina about that, but you were pinging me even before that. This latest engagement is only the latest example.

In the meantime, before I ISO people and OUTLINE everything, I suggest you ISO me and ASK on why my reads seem so uncredible this game.

In post 387, Reality Check wrote:worst

Why does your tone feel really really off this game?

BECAUSE PEOPLE AREN'T THINKING.

In post 390, Reality Check wrote:I think I'd have to mindmeld with mastina about that, but you were pinging me even before that. This latest engagement is only the latest example.

try my sunglasses

your responses to Taly include nothing but armchair scumhunting logic and a clear lack of actually reading his posts critically.

Please explain specifically where you disagree with him

In post 388, the worst wrote:because I don't think you've played with me actually giving a fuck about a game yet

this is improtat btw Anka

Taly

I don't scumread you, I actually townread you

I want you on a page where I feel like I can WORK with you, but I don't think that's viable right now since... well, that's the impression I've been getting from your reads.

If that's not actually true, then fine, I'll stop engaging until I directly see it and try again afterwards.

In post 391, Vartsun wrote:BECAUSE PEOPLE AREN'T THINKING

becom ston
den u nevr have 2 think

In post 394, the worst wrote:

In post 388, the worst wrote:because I don't think you've played with me actually giving a fuck about a game yet

this is improtat btw Anka

What was your play in the first several pages of the game?

can you please explain where you strongly disagree with Taly's comments or where you think he's coming from a blatantly incorrect place? I don't think you're actually reading most of what he's saying.

pedit: giving a fuck about the game as best I can!! save the last ~48 hrs when I've been busy as shit irl and access has been wonky

In post 393, the worst wrote:your responses to Taly include nothing but armchair scumhunting logic and a clear lack of actually reading his posts critically.

Please explain specifically where you disagree with him

No point now, tbh

I'll just watch him from the background and see if his reads look better over time.