Posted: Fri May 25, 2018 1:41 pm
oh. yes. I am bored.
i mean, with the exception of the worst, everyone on the lower tier of my list in 211 is also among the lower half when it comes to postcount.In post 374, ruru wrote:Like we're 15 pages in and I just kinda feel like nothing happened and I'm bored
Like I need RC flaming me or something so I can get into the game more
I feel like you were experiencing this too at least a few pages ago
i'm not anywhere near confident yet, but he's definitely got my attention.In post 380, the worst wrote:how confident are you in scum!ofrhz? I'm starting to feel like I might be being stupid.
What about compared to hitalt's vote?In post 379, the worst wrote:pretty much read his early game as busywork and thought his vote on me was terrible
Yeah, this is like precisely one of the reasons why the game is awfulIn post 382, northsidegal wrote:this is kind of why i was doing the "taking it slow" route, because i'm not sure how much my making all of this clear will change his behavior such that it'd be unreadable, but i think doing this is necessary for the gamestate right now at the very least.
ofrhz was mislynched on D1 in that game. I see no difference so farIn post 381, northsidegal wrote:@Other Open 721-ers
Thoughts on ofhrz here as compared to last game? Correct me if i'm wrong, but from what i remember in both of the games i've played with him people just considered him obviously town – obviously town to the point where i don't think i've ever really expended that much effort trying to read him, i just wrote him off as town.
Is the fact that i can't really write him off as town yet meaningful?
Elli-tell still seems valid here as well. He really hasn't been much of a presence so far – i should go back and check open 721 and 1859's early game postcount there to compare. (this is something math might want to do / have done already as well)
?In post 385, ruru wrote:Yeah, this is like precisely one of the reasons why the game is awfulIn post 382, northsidegal wrote:this is kind of why i was doing the "taking it slow" route, because i'm not sure how much my making all of this clear will change his behavior such that it'd be unreadable, but i think doing this is necessary for the gamestate right now at the very least.
HWS I think the same thing you're asking is answered in the same post you're quoting. If you react badly at pressure either as town or scum, then you don't want to be pressured 'cause either you're being mislynched or caught, that's like... The definition of NAI. But I said the same thing that you're saying: I don't think he was redirecting anything 'cause there was no "anything" in the first placeIn post 273, HeWhoSwims wrote:I personally think this was a damning thing so let's discuss. What does town jjh get from redirecting this off of himself now? I do feel he had a small bit of pressure after somewhat of a flaming start. As if he didn't want attraction to divert from him as much as from his content... Do you see what I'm saying or am I seeing this wrong? Also I'd find this more excusable if it were an actual wagon but it's RVSIn post 206, pinturicchio wrote:Now about the misunderstanding: no I don't think jjh was trying to redirect heat off himself, 'cause I don't think there was heat on himself in the first place. What I find ironic is that, by saying that about NSG, NSG went full bananas on him but either way, about redirecting heat... I don't think that's a treat only scum has; town doesn't want to be the center of attention either. Town doesn't care that much maybe, but from my point of view, I try to analyze this things in a way like "is this relevant to my read on this player? If yes, why; if no, read something else". jjh's motivation is a no, first 'cause there's not enough evidence to think anything about that post, and second 'cause even if he was trying to derail attention, I wouldn't know how to read that
solution: lynch all lurkersIn post 388, ruru wrote:Because I think your strategy is kind of optimal
i'm only half-joking with this, by the way. if we want to use the "let scum incriminate themselves" strategy, then naked voting lurkers up to a decently sized wagon serves to get them to post more while also not necessarily revealing the reasons behind a scumread.In post 390, northsidegal wrote:solution: lynch all lurkersIn post 388, ruru wrote:Because I think your strategy is kind of optimal
Zoronos I think me being cooperative with you started because I am townreading you (you remember my first towngame in this place), and even if we got different conclusions, I now got a townread on you, and that's good. What I don't get is why were you scumleaning/reading me in the first place; you started asking me questions before seeing that our conclusions were different, so what was first, the duckling or the egg?In post 354, Zoronos wrote:I feel like I should dump my thoughts from my discussion with Pintu, but they’re still a bit jumbly. So, bear with me.
I think Pintu is seeing the evidence completely differently than I am. At first I wanted to call that scummy, but if I had one word to describe our discussion, that word would be “reasonable”. He never got incensed or frustrated, or called me scummy for leaning on him, he just calmly explained his position and why he disagreed with me.
I don’t really like his predicates, but he was very insist on their validity, and he took those predicates to a reasonable place. I can see how he got from A to B, even if I disagree with A. He didn’t bow or give an inch in his discussion, while remaining willing to engage it.
My gut says that’s towny but I struggle to clearly explain why or specifically what parts of our discussion made me feel towny on him. Maybe that he’s playing highly cooperatively?
Sorry for the mess, but that’s where I ended up. I wish I could have ended up at a ‘yeah, got the scum!, but that would be stretching for a conclusion I wanted instead of the conclusion I think the evidence points towards. I think my initial scum lean was wrong.
i'm not exactly sure what that implies, but i think i'm probably okay with it.In post 395, pinturicchio wrote:@NSG you're pretty talkative in this game compared to all the other games I've played with you. Wanna jam?
Did I not explain that? I thought I explained that.In post 394, pinturicchio wrote: Zoronos I think me being cooperative with you started because I am townreading you (you remember my first towngame in this place), and even if we got different conclusions, I now got a townread on you, and that's good. What I don't get is why were you scumleaning/reading me in the first place; you started asking me questions before seeing that our conclusions were different, so what was first, the duckling or the egg?
Interested in if your jjh read progressed and in a Mathdino readIn post 396, northsidegal wrote:i'm not exactly sure what that implies, but i think i'm probably okay with it.In post 395, pinturicchio wrote:@NSG you're pretty talkative in this game compared to all the other games I've played with you. Wanna jam?