The case on you raised by me and the primary focus of conversation for the last few pages. I can get you being dismissive of it - but why waste my time pretending it doesn't exist?
In post 375, Flubbernugget wrote: In post 167, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 162, Thor665 wrote:
Who has ever, as scum, passed the buck in RVS? I'd love to see an example of that ever.
In post 154, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oh wait it’s the inverse
Why do you expect scum!me to be more active than town!me Thor?
My general experience and opinion of your play.
Are you claiming I'm wrong?
I don’t know any specific examples but I think I vaguely remember ver some instance of the passing the buck thing
re: meta Scumread,
I’d say your meta was right if you had played with me recently, but our last game together was Newbie 1836, which was before my meta shift
, so your evidence is wrong despite having a valid thought process. I don’t recall rolling scum in a game with you in it even.
Alright thor
Is this the post where gamma admits that your meta of him is correct? Because he just says your thought processes are valid. When he says your evidence is wrong, that's basically saying they aren't sound. You need both soundness and validity to be correct.
With an awareness that the bolded is, functionally, a lie in his dismissal of my ability to read him, and also is a straight admission of me being right in the meta - how do you get to the conclusion you are presenting?
In post 376, Flubbernugget wrote: In post 273, Gamma Emerald wrote:I felt like it could be a thing because it made sense as a possible intent.
If you were currrent with me, I wouldn’t question your meta on me
since it is right. But since you’re not, I perceive that you are making a faulty argument.
I don’t trust you using outdated yet incorrect meta to form a scumread on me, even if it is correct meta nowadays
.
This post removes any sense of ambiguity that gamma could be conceding that you're correct with exception to the meta you have no right to try and case someone with anyway.
What he's saying here is that I'm using old meta. Which I'm not and he knows I'm not.
He's also admitting I'm right about his current meta presuming I know his current meta - which I do.
What are you talking about Flubber?
Did you read my timeline breakdown of the Gamma v. Thor interactions?
I feel like I'm talking to a wall right now, please interact with me about this - I'm dead right and you're arguing sideways from me as far as I can see.
