Mafiascum.net

In post 368, Creature wrote:

In post 365, Titus wrote:

In post 364, Creature wrote:Hey what do we do?

If you think I am town, vote Correspondence

Nah, still want to see someone actually for that slot.

In post 369, Creature wrote:

In post 360, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Why are they bad?

Because we have TvTvT wagons?

If we have t v t v t wagons, Correspondence is still the best vote because he isn't playing. He's posting just enough to avoid attention/replacement. If two are locktown and three options well...

Correspondence isn't even talking atm so let's see what comes from this.
VOTE: Correspondence

are you suggesting that you and Norway are locktown? or just using that as an example?

because if you're actually suggesting that then lmao

No prods here, chief. I was V/LA.

I don't think it's a good idea to look at the nominations and think "this is probably TTT, let's lynch the lazy guy". If you look in the history of this game, scum almost always nominate one of their own on the second day. If any of the three of these folks start saying "I'm town! I was nominated on day 2, remember?" that means absolutely nothing and deserves zero towncred. If anything, it's a point against them.

Let's at least for the sake of making this day useful and productive pretend that at least one of them is scum, even if you really think that they're all town. Who's the mafia in titus / norwegianboy / correspondence? It's literally never correspondence, that's the compromise bait vote. Mafia get pseudo nightkills on even days, and if I was scum oh heck yes I would nightkill correspondence for the absolutely zero information given to town. Scum's best move is to lynch correspondence today. We're not doing that.

Let's start here, shall we?

VOTE: titus

Burying mutant in that long string of posts was completely unnessecary. It increased (my) bias against him without actually contributing anything. I saw a lot of the things that you saw, and I could have posted them, but I chose not to because it wasn't going to be productive. Furthermore, everyone is giving norwegianboy flak for making the hammer, but does anybody actually realize that titus was the one who suggested we get some intent to hammer? This was followed by norwegianboy's sloppy hammer. I'm not willing to lynch norwegianboy right now.

Straight up, Titus is pushing a scum agenda this game.

Suggesting we get intent for hammer when SEVEN days remain on the deadline is scum agenda. The fact that nobody has called this out is absurd.
Making a totally useless lynch on correspondence today is scum agenda.

moar on titus kthnx

Awoo, that's a big game of wifom.

Scum would never nominate the weakest member, so let's sneak it in. They'll lynch the active players.

We lynch the scummiest players not predict scum until we have evidence to do so. If Correspondence comes back or is replaced with someone who can change the read, great. I just think he's the most likely scum.

In post 381, pisskop wrote:moar on titus kthnx

The fuck?

In post 380, Awoo wrote:Suggesting we get intent for hammer when SEVEN days remain on the deadline is scum agenda.

Catch scum, lynch scum. Period. I have zero regrets in calling for the hammer. Sure, I was wrong but I believed it.

In post 377, Menalque wrote:are you suggesting that you and Norway are locktown? or just using that as an example?

because if you're actually suggesting that then lmao

I think it was my autocorrect but ITR Norweifan and I don't TR Correspondence

So what's the town motivation behind this wagon?

Pressuring someone who's going to be replaced isn't really possible because they're not there.
Lynching him also isn't useful because why not just let him get replaced.

But lynching an inactive VT slot before they get replaced! Now that's the mafia jackpot.

In post 386, Awoo wrote:Pressuring someone who's going to be replaced isn't really possible because they're not there.
Lynching him also isn't useful because why not just let him get replaced.

I don't think we should hammer before hand. Correspondence's activity was independently scummy though. I want to see what his replacement does under pressure because the pattern by Correspondence is much more worthy of pressure than Norwegian.

why was corre scummy?

Correspondence has two votes. He deliberately uses an obscuring font to be harder to read. He uses words that even I had to look up. His posting seems designed to be flipped and to draw attention to me and pisskop. Saying that I'm the new shopkeeper in town seems designed that I'd be the fall girl and pisskop afterwards.

He also snuck in the middle and never hunted. He knew damn well he lurked out the day.

I’m blue badadeedabadoo

VOTE: titus

Signalling intent. Will hammer in 3 seconds.



...(no)

In post 375, Titus wrote:If we have t v t v t wagons, Correspondence is still the best vote because he isn't playing.

No, he's likely the most lynchable option here and I don't think scum would set him up for that. I'd rather wait someone fill that empty slot.

If we're going to lynch someone, it will be someone we need to sort to proceed the game, so you or Norwegian.

In post 370, Joey_ wrote:

In post 369, Creature wrote:

In post 360, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Why are they bad?

Because we have TvTvT wagons?

You think so? What is your poe outside the pool?

pisskop?
Menalque?
Dongempire?
PMysterious?

Helloooo?

In post 395, Creature wrote:

In post 375, Titus wrote:If we have t v t v t wagons, Correspondence is still the best vote because he isn't playing.

No, he's likely the most lynchable option here and I don't think scum would set him up for that. I'd rather wait someone fill that empty slot.

If we're going to lynch someone, it will be someone we need to sort to proceed the game, so you or Norwegian.

So basically scum lurk and trying gets punished. Good to know.

In post 376, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Correspondence isn't even talking atm so let's see what comes from this.
VOTE: Correspondence

Okay, there's a chance we may have a TvTvS here

In post 397, Titus wrote:

In post 395, Creature wrote:

In post 375, Titus wrote:If we have t v t v t wagons, Correspondence is still the best vote because he isn't playing.

No, he's likely the most lynchable option here and I don't think scum would set him up for that. I'd rather wait someone fill that empty slot.

If we're going to lynch someone, it will be someone we need to sort to proceed the game, so you or Norwegian.

So basically scum lurk and trying gets punished. Good to know.

Well, we wait the slot to get replaced.