Posted: Mon Jan 27, 2020 3:38 pm
Snowpiece
This is really strange to me. I'll rehash my points on you at the end, but you responded to most of my initial read on Chara just a few posts earlier, and none of the parts you addressed involved the misinterpretation.In post 365, Nachomamma8 wrote:Can you rehash the bits you don't like about Chara and I? My impression was that the thrust of your read on both was mostly due to things that were misinterpreted.
First, you got it reversed; it was a "stop doing this" about something that was town/otherwise made them not want to lynch Sujimichi. Second, it is definitely nitpicky: this fits into a style of behavior I've always found weirdly ingratiating or two-faced.In post 361, Nachomamma8 wrote:I don't really vibe with this post.
1) Saying the "stop doing this" as opposed to "this is scummy" is a stylistic choice and doesn't really have anything to do with a difference in motivation, IMO. It has a slightly more aggressive edge I guess, but the point overall here seems fairly nitpicky - your in depth bit on not liking giving scumreads advice because it allows them to adjust also seems to be a much too serious interpretation.
I acknowledged within the post that limited flips complicates things:In post 361, Nachomamma8 wrote:2) Your framing of Chara's change of heart on mechanics is a bit disingenuous; Chara's mind changed because they didn't realize the impact of playing a limited flip game, which I'd argue is significantly different from "realizing townreads are wrong".
I don't know what motivation scum Chara would have for the switch, but my point was that it was a strange thing to think about sparing people, and classifying the setup as a townhunting one, without properly considering that they don't flip. The theme of my early posts really centered around the one word that kept cropping up in my mind: "bizarre"Replica wrote:After being gungho for townhunting, Chara gets reined in by the revelation that...the townreads might be wrong. No flips does indeed complicate things, but this is so bizarre to not even think about. Chara had to have done at least some thinking given that they leaped to classifying it as a townhunting setup. On the surface this is seems slightly scummy, more just bizarre, but I feel like there's more in my gut that I can't quite get to.
This is really bad; townreading both of the lurkers without reasons points to a classic newer scum mistake: Knowing someone is town and working in reverse.In post 356, Nachomamma8 wrote:Just hopping off the plane now - I will make a concerted effort to do a solid catch-up tonight because I will have time to do so. Chemist's townreads are extraordinarily strange if he's scum - I don't think he has good reasons for calling Pine or Asriel town, but I don't see him sticking his neck out for either of them regardless of his alignment if he's scum here.
The first part I buy, the second part is off. As far as I can tell the successful use of the gimmick is the main thrust of your read on him. That isn't dependent on the other game existing, you're right, but the overall effect is that you seem to not think Hectic capable of pulling a stylistic choice off successfully as scum. There's a shared thread of "expectations" The substance, which seems to relate to his push on Sherlock and reactions towards Chemist/Billy, seems very secondary.In post 366, Nachomamma8 wrote:I do think it's useful to keep the "if Hectic is scum here, this is is first significant scum game" and I think that it's useful to see that Hectic's initial scum game WAS an extremely conservative one and is a harsh difference from the play we are here. It's not the main thrust of my read - I'd still be pressing for the spare on him even if that one scum game didn't exist.
if it wasn't clear, i knew that sparing meant spared players did not flip. what hadn't fully clicked was how, fundamentally, not receiving feedback can harm overall usable information.In post 377, Replica wrote:I don't know what motivation scum Chara would have for the switch, but my point was that it was a strange thing to think about sparing people, and classifying the setup as a townhunting one, without properly considering that they don't flip. The theme of my early posts really centered around the one word that kept cropping up in my mind: "bizarre"
when you say cop-out push, do you mean you think scum are pushing it, or just LHF?In post 343, Chemist1422 wrote:not hecticIn post 342, Chara wrote:where do you see scum, Chemist?
probably not you, rep, or asriel
I feel like pine is a cop-out push at this point so slightly lean town there
so that leaves sherlock/nacho/alim/amrun/suji
will probably work through this soon
provided Hectic is town, i think i like this attitude for town more than scum, in that it's going against the grain on a consensus townread but still begrudgingly going along with it. it feels like a weird angle to take if scum.In post 358, alimdia wrote:I don't have a strong TR on hectic, even tho he seems to be one of the few that understands what I'm saying at times. I can't give a TR just because of that. However, theres been so many people independently sparing Hectic, that if he were scum we would eventually lose anyway. I think most people's opinions are quite hard to change, so might as well spare him if everyone is going to afk and not fight.
Just LHF but I do think scum are probably pushing it if I’m rightIn post 383, Chara wrote:when you say cop-out push, do you mean you think scum are pushing it, or just LHF?In post 343, Chemist1422 wrote:not hecticIn post 342, Chara wrote:where do you see scum, Chemist?
probably not you, rep, or asriel
I feel like pine is a cop-out push at this point so slightly lean town there
so that leaves sherlock/nacho/alim/amrun/suji
will probably work through this soon
In post 350, Sujimichi wrote:Are you ready for me to Spare you?
In post 380, Chara wrote: there's the style to the posting (something that i believe is inherent to Replica, which is not AI in and of itself) first of all, which rings honest. i'm not explaining it well but i think it's something that's really difficult to fake, the way that Replica has essentially introduced themself and their methodology and then proceeded to apply it in a way that does not seem performative.
i kind of don't want to know who they are but i can't help wondering anyway.
In post 312, Chemist1422 wrote:I’m not 100% on my Asriel spare, never was, but he hasn’t done anything to make him strongly trend down
I haven’t been that around tbh but you’re probably the only person I would consider moving my spare to
In post 329, Chemist1422 wrote:@Rep
I switched to Asriel from Hectic because I wanted do be doing something new with my vote
Really I don’t remember having a reason but it was probably something like that
@Chemist: Howdy! If you're not 100% on your Asriel SPARE, does lurking and prodging not trend him down? If you wanted something new to do with your vote, why is locking it on Asriel useful, especially since Asriel disappeared?In post 348, Chemist1422 wrote:Asriel's ISO to me is like
town null null null null etc.
really the only thing is towny tone and him having nothing against him
Yes, there are a few reasons:
it's been fairly low activity, but invigorated by Replica's replacement, among other things. Hectic's attitude and amount of helpful interactions is why i TR him at least, plus pushing for content here and continuing to do so. delaying his own spare at i believe L-1 is something i like, since i find it likely he'd have had no problems if scum and he decided to tell alimdia (is that who it was?) to go ahead.In post 390, Farkran wrote:Hello everyone, i'm the replacement of asriel. I have only skimmed the thread and the mod ISO so far. By VC 1.7 i noticed that i am consensus scumread (Fight-2) and Hectic is consensus townread (Spare-1). Does anyone want to provide a recap as to why the gamestate is like it is? I will reread anyways, but having a different POV based review would be helpful.
Not particularly, honestly, especially since he was being open about not being interested in the game it feels more like an NAI thingIn post 393, Hectic wrote:
The IDIOT skeleton liked him early because he seemed natural/genuine, and liked how he pointed out Asriel'sawkwardness. But recently, he's felt a lot less engaged, and I don't understand keeping a SPARE vote on Asriel.In post 312, Chemist1422 wrote:I’m not 100% on my Asriel spare, never was, but he hasn’t done anything to make him strongly trend down
I haven’t been that around tbh but you’re probably the only person I would consider moving my spare toIn post 329, Chemist1422 wrote:@Rep
I switched to Asriel from Hectic because I wanted do be doing something new with my vote
Really I don’t remember having a reason but it was probably something like that@Chemist: Howdy! If you're not 100% on your Asriel SPARE, does lurking and prodging not trend him down? If you wanted something new to do with your vote, why is locking it on Asriel useful, especially since Asriel disappeared?In post 348, Chemist1422 wrote:Asriel's ISO to me is like
town null null null null etc.
really the only thing is towny tone and him having nothing against him
LHF is people who are getting pushed on specifically for that reason, or any other that makes them easy to lynch (abrasive personality, inability to produce content, bad reads)In post 396, Chara wrote:hello Psyche, Farkran, thanks for stepping up.
Chemist: what's the difference between LHF and no-content/null? i understand where the Asriel TR came from, though i don't agree.
it will be nice to see more from both slots, however.
Hectic: about 275, i also found them to be minor things to focus on. but the elaboration on finding the tone duplicitous is i think understandable, especially given the persona i was roleplaying, so i don't find it strange to pick up on necessarily, in hindsight.