In post 1, GeorgeBailey wrote:Prodging - A naked "prod dodge" does not reset the prod timer. To avoid being prodded/replaced for inactivity, include some game advancing content in your prodges, such as "got prodded; xxxx is still scum."
VOTE: GeorgeBailey
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 10:53 am
by Saudade
In post 382, popopopopopopo wrote:@saudade this isnt facebook we dont all have to use selfies for avatars like you
Wait. I re-read your ISO and noticed this. Was this question directed at me?
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 11:17 am
by NorwegianboyEE
Firebringer reads as very pockety towards Luna tbh. I'm not sure i dig the whole "voting whoever you vote, Town!luna's reads are the BEST!" thing he's got going on.
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 11:20 am
by NorwegianboyEE
VOTE: Firebringer
Who wants to go to a real wagon.
In post 238, popopopopopopo wrote:next his scum buddy zantetsu (THATS RIGHT I SAID IT) asks him to explain himself (COACHING?????)
I personally have never seen this mysterious thing called coaching. People talk about it in game from time to time, but I've never seen it personally.
Also scum have daytalk so why would in-game coaching be needed?
i imagine it went something like this in scum daytalk thread:
Zantetsu: peter hop on the popo wagon, ill ask you to explain your vote while I stay off the wagon for town points. you can answer me with these points; etc.
This is probably a town post
Scummy post. Firebringer took a look at this and thought: "Oh snap, i gotta townread this!" but it's not really a towntell from Popopo, it's what scum thinks is a towntell.
In post 1, GeorgeBailey wrote:Prodging - A naked "prod dodge" does not reset the prod timer. To avoid being prodded/replaced for inactivity, include some game advancing content in your prodges, such as "got prodded; xxxx is still scum."
VOTE: GeorgeBailey
GeorgeBailey I give you permission to force replace this player early. Don't bother waiting for any prod timers. Thanks.
Posted: Sun May 03, 2020 12:13 pm
by Luna Fox
In post 388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Firebringer reads as very pockety towards Luna tbh. I'm not sure i dig the whole "voting whoever you vote, Town!luna's reads are the BEST!" thing he's got going on.
It is possible, but I'm not sure a scum fire sheeps me onto himself (my previous post about sheeping me when i was voting him was a joke and now apparently he's proxying his vote to me?)
In post 388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Firebringer reads as very pockety towards Luna tbh. I'm not sure i dig the whole "voting whoever you vote, Town!luna's reads are the BEST!" thing he's got going on.
It is possible, but I'm not sure a scum fire sheeps me onto himself (my previous post about sheeping me when i was voting him was a joke and now apparently he's proxying his vote to me?)
He voted himself for approximately 10 posts as a joke before switching when you did. That’s impossible for scum!Firebringer to do?
In post 388, NorwegianboyEE wrote:Firebringer reads as very pockety towards Luna tbh. I'm not sure i dig the whole "voting whoever you vote, Town!luna's reads are the BEST!" thing he's got going on.
It is possible, but I'm not sure a scum fire sheeps me onto himself (my previous post about sheeping me when i was voting him was a joke and now apparently he's proxying his vote to me?)
Luna your thought process feels really shallow to me. Sorry just calling it like I see it.
You are saying that Firebringer is not being pockety towards you because if he was he wouldn't have jokingly voted himself when you voted him? I just can't buy that that is a legitimate argument given that a) it happened when he had only a few votes and no obvious attention from most players, b) he could switch it to someone else easily at any time for unimpeachable reasons, c) he did switch it pretty shortly thereafter, d) he explicitly stated that he was sheeping you and I think it's obvious that he was just trying to emphasize that point.