Mafiascum.net

quick this is u isn't it be honest

In post 346, CantHateAPuppy wrote:However, if i don't have u as scum i don't have u as town either. i think u're being a little passive, not in a scummie sense, but i think u are a bigger blank to me than some other posters. Help me out. Do u have a second strong scumread besides votato?

I would not say strong. I do believe there could be some scum bussing interaction around votato. I'd rather keep that close to the vest until I'm more sure. I also think it is very possible there could be some scum in the wall paper crowd of people who are barely posting. Hard to say which, given a lack of stuff to read there. That's another reason we should try to improve the signal-noise ratio.

I have more town reads than scum at this moment. I'd say I'm fairly confident to this point that you, Blair, Quick and Atarashi are more likely town than scum.

In post 374, CantHateAPuppy wrote:Blair v. Quick is town v town, fight me:

In post 363, Quick wrote:If you take a joke comment to mean something it doesn't, I am pretty sure that is Scummy behavior. Keep pushing this though, I would love to see how it develops.

Like, come on, this just screams, "OH WOE AM i," dramatic, drama queen, wants to be misunderstood so he can complain about how he is misunderstood and pretend that makes him a better poster than us.

Naw, or it's just that I think there are actual reasons to SR Blair. Your response is cute though, just like a puppy. Could never lynch a puppy tbqh.

In post 376, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 346, CantHateAPuppy wrote:However, if i don't have u as scum i don't have u as town either. i think u're being a little passive, not in a scummie sense, but i think u are a bigger blank to me than some other posters. Help me out. Do u have a second strong scumread besides votato?

I would not say strong. I do believe there could be some scum bussing interaction around votato. I'd rather keep that close to the vest until I'm more sure. I also think it is very possible there could be some scum in the wall paper crowd of people who are barely posting. Hard to say which, given a lack of stuff to read there. That's another reason we should try to improve the signal-noise ratio.

I have more town reads than scum at this moment. I'd say I'm fairly confident to this point that you, Blair, Quick and Atarashi are more likely town than scum.

Rule of 3. Nope not explaining that.

In post 376, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 346, CantHateAPuppy wrote:However, if i don't have u as scum i don't have u as town either. i think u're being a little passive, not in a scummie sense, but i think u are a bigger blank to me than some other posters. Help me out. Do u have a second strong scumread besides votato?

I would not say strong. I do believe there could be some

scum bussing interaction around votato.

I'd rather keep that close to the vest until I'm more sure. I also think it is very possible there could be

some scum in the wall paper crowd of people who are barely posting.

Hard to say which, given a lack of stuff to read there. That's another reason we should try to improve the signal-noise ratio.

I have more town reads than scum at this moment. I'd say I'm fairly confident to this point that

you, Blair, Quick and Atarashi are more likely town than scum.

Agree with of all of this tbh

But this is also a recipe for u to keep hanging back and waiting for other people to do something, u've kind of shifted all of the work off urself for a "close to the vest" approach

So u know i have to ask u one more time if u have reads u want to put out there, right? Help me out here

In post 300, Umlaut wrote:votato (5): VP Baltar, CantLynchAPuppy, iDanyboy, Blair, Nauci

this was the votato wagon before blair switched, so if u have me and blair as townreads then it follows u suspect Dany or nauci could be bussing

i will make this sinple

Hi Hi !

Please convince us u are not scum doing a dastard bus on ur obvious partner votato. What do u think of the wagon now that it's been a few pages?

VP also completely ignored all the questions asked of him. interesting.

Hi, stop blowing up my spot. I do not want to get NKed

In post 382, VP Baltar wrote:Hi, stop blowing up my spot. I do not want to get NKed

This was to puppy

Hi again VP!

it's ur responsibilit to not get NK'd, not mine!

Thanks for reading!

In post 381, votato wrote:VP also completely ignored all the questions asked of him. interesting.

And u ignored the question and which questions i was "ignoring". is this double interesting? triple interesting?

In post 385, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 381, votato wrote:VP also completely ignored all the questions asked of him. interesting.

And u ignored the question and which questions i was "ignoring". is this double interesting? triple interesting?

Not interesting at all actually. ISO function works pretty well on this site. You can F3 = ?

Page 15 makes me want to facepalm so hard

But also it is the most Stereoquickipal behavior I've ever seen. It's one of his top 3 schticks to aggressively misinterpret someone and then make a whole truck load of posts with that misinterpretation as the premise.

Quick: Blair is saying you were lying because you, on 3 separate occasions, claimed you purposely post enigmatically/mysteriously, and then in the 4th post claimed that you were NOT trying to be cryptic, which totally contradicts the previous 3 posts

Blair: I think that Quick both meant what he said the first 3 times, and what he said with that last bit, because A: the part about him NOT trying to be cryptic was referring to a very specific subset of his posts, and B: he sometimes owns the fact that he's unintentionally cryptic because he doesn't explain his theories well enough, but sometimes he also says that this happens because he's intentionally being mysterious. It's the sort of thing that has gotten him mislynched many a time. I think that if you're going to scum read him, you have to go a bit deeper than surface contradictions.

In post 376, VP Baltar wrote:Atarashi are more likely town than scum

What led you to determine this before he has come back today and responded to the scum reads on him?

In post 386, Quick wrote:

In post 385, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 381, votato wrote:VP also completely ignored all the questions asked of him. interesting.

And u ignored the question and which questions i was "ignoring". is this double interesting? triple interesting?

Not interesting at all actually. ISO function works pretty well on this site. You can F3 = ?

i looked and didn't find it, so i asked and got no response

instead votato shades me for doing exactl what he's doing

looking scummier and scummier but i'm willing to hear him explain how this is all a mistake and he's about to speak in clear convincing answers... soon, i'm sure of it, just around the corner here...

In post 382, VP Baltar wrote:Hi, stop blowing up my spot. I do not want to get NKed

I didn't know how I felt about your previous post but what is this LAMIST bs

(oh hey look some of the MS alphabet soup is coming back to me now)

In post 387, Nauci wrote:Page 15 makes me want to facepalm so hard

But also it is the most Stereoquickipal behavior I've ever seen. It's one of his top 3 schticks to aggressively misinterpret someone and then make a whole truck load of posts with that misinterpretation as the premise.

Quick: Blair is saying you were lying because you, on 3 separate occasions, claimed you purposely post enigmatically/mysteriously, and then in the 4th post claimed that you were NOT trying to be cryptic, which totally contradicts the previous 3 posts

Blair: I think that Quick both meant what he said the first 3 times, and what he said with that last bit, because A: the part about him NOT trying to be cryptic was referring to a very specific subset of his posts, and B: he sometimes owns the fact that he's unintentionally cryptic because he doesn't explain his theories well enough, but sometimes he also says that this happens because he's intentionally being mysterious. It's the sort of thing that has gotten him mislynched many a time. I think that if you're going to scum read him, you have to go a bit deeper than surface contradictions.

I know what Blair is claiming. It's just an excuse to OMGUS tbh.

In post 386, Quick wrote:

In post 385, CantHateAPuppy wrote:

In post 381, votato wrote:VP also completely ignored all the questions asked of him. interesting.

And u ignored the question and which questions i was "ignoring". is this double interesting? triple interesting?

Not interesting at all actually. ISO function works pretty well on this site. You can F3 = ?

To be fair I ISOed votato twice and still don't know what he was referring to because all of the questions I saw seemed like rhetorical backhanded statements?

In post 336, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 331, Quick wrote:Okay, Effort for donkey just means he is Town. That is all I am saying.

I'll bite. Give me the case on Blair.

So at the time of this question, Blair’s VC was 2, NPOM and Quick. NPOM voted Blair way back in 189. Quick voted Blair closer to this post in 270 while baiting “feel free to ask me for my reasoning” which makes me believe that VP Baltar is directing the above at Quick.

In 376, VP Baltar says he’s pretty sure Quick and Blair are town. I don’t think town!VP Baltar asks his TR Quick about their case on TR Blair. Town!VP Baltar would only asks this if he’s scum reading at least one of Quick/Blair.

His town read post came after a Blair vs Quick so it’s possible he read that as TvT since, but that means he was scum reading Blair since he was town reading Quick in 317.

He never makes a push on Blair prior to this or expresses any sort of scum read on Blair. I think the above is disingenuous and he looking for town to eat itself here.

Quick, bruh, u definiteyl know exactly what u did and how u contradicted urself

Blair's vote is lame imo, "Lynch all liars" is lame in this context, but u did it to urself and u have to know that

So did u do a reaction test? Because if u just think it's OMGUS then it's just null to u right? So why keep making a thing about something that's null?

In post 244, votato wrote:also, its page fucking 10. no one has the game solved. im probably wrong about atarashi. im just spitballing here and point out something i noticed. if you agree with me, why arent you voting atarashi? if you disagree, why not tell me what you disagree with? puppy and VP, what are your reads? what do you think of atarashi? you're both asking questions without actually offering up any thoughts of your own.

explain your thoughts about atarashi. you now have said you townread him right? but why? like someone else said, it seems premature since a case was made, and then he disappeared. if i suddenly disappeared for a day would you suddenly townread me, too?

Like, blair's vote is lame and i agree with u about that

But so what? do u think it's a scum tell or a town tell? if neither, then what?

From what I can tell he wasn't saying anything substantiv when he was supposedly contradicting himself.

In post 393, mavsfan41 wrote:

In post 336, VP Baltar wrote:

In post 331, Quick wrote:Okay, Effort for donkey just means he is Town. That is all I am saying.

I'll bite. Give me the case on Blair.

So at the time of this question, Blair’s VC was 2, NPOM and Quick. NPOM voted Blair way back in 189. Quick voted Blair closer to this post in 270 while baiting “feel free to ask me for my reasoning” which makes me believe that VP Baltar is directing the above at Quick.

In 376, VP Baltar says he’s pretty sure Quick and Blair are town. I don’t think town!VP Baltar asks his TR Quick about their case on TR Blair. Town!VP Baltar would only asks this if he’s scum reading at least one of Quick/Blair.

His town read post came after a Blair vs Quick so it’s possible he read that as TvT since, but that means he was scum reading Blair since he was town reading Quick in 317.

He never makes a push on Blair prior to this or expresses any sort of scum read on Blair. I think the above is disingenuous and he looking for town to eat itself here.

Vote: VP Baltar

this is what i was talking about when i said i was waiting for juicy/tasty posts. atarashi is not off the hook, but VOTE: VP

In post 391, Quick wrote:I know what Blair is claiming. It's just an excuse to OMGUS tbh.

It's interesting to me how you knew what I was claiming yet chose to blatantly misrepresent it as something else ("You're voting me for townreading votato? omg is this real?")

In post 387, Nauci wrote:But also it is the most Stereoquickipal behavior I've ever seen. It's one of his top 3 schticks to aggressively misinterpret someone and then make a whole truck load of posts with that misinterpretation as the premise.

I find that schtick violently anti-town, and that's being generous.

What are the other two schticks? I do not wish to be caught unawares.