Mafiascum.net

In post 374, Umlaut wrote:I would say "do you want to explain that vote, Menalque" but I assume you would have explained it if you wanted to

question that isn't intended to be aggressive but I don't think I can word in a non-aggressive way

what's the point of this post?

Good question actually. I probably should have just said "can you explain?" because I'd be interested to see a case if there is one. But as I was writing that I realized I'm not all that confident he's going to give a case if I ask. But I guess I can at least try.

Would you explain where that vote is coming from?

In post 367, Eevee wrote:

In post 358, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 356, Snowblaze wrote:...
Chemist gets slight townpoints for their only response to Fredrick’s accusations being “wat”, I feel like scum would be more likely to take accusations seriously.
...

I would like to point out that since making that post, Chemist1422 has posted 4 times in Micro 953: Treestump Express as of the time I am making this post. (citation)

you shouldn't talk about other ongoing voyages btw

why have you decided to use cross game activity tells to this extent on today's cruise? i skimmed though your last town expedition and couldn't find you use a single one - do you scumread anyone in this game for their content alone and not those tells?

~Eve

I just thought it was a way to help me form a read. Thanks for reminding me that I shouldn't be talking about other ongoing voyages. I have forgotten about that.

In post 370, Chemist1422 wrote:I’m not going to answer fredrick because I’m of the opinion that cross-game activity tells should be against the rules if they aren’t already

Don't think the below is even remotely related to cross-game activity.

In post 361, Fredrick A Campbell wrote:

In post 114, Eevee wrote:

In post 60, Chemist1422 wrote:holden's take on the mechanics was towny imo it's a bit bold for scum

Which takes do you referring to? And why do you think mechanic talk is "bold" in any circumstance?

~Eva

Anyway, I just noticed this post and looked through your ISO, Chemist1422. You have not responded to this question and I am interested in the answer.

In post 376, Umlaut wrote:Would you explain where that vote is coming from?

Feel like Holden has very much disappeared from the game as a presence after having done just enough to seem like town + he’s voting me which is a wagon I would expect a scum to have gotten on

I don’t particularly want to control the game here but people need to stop fucking around on 2 person wagons and get to voting some people up

My candidate is Holden. Get onboard or tell me why I’m wrong

That’s @evwryone

In post 380, Menalque wrote:I don’t particularly want to control the game here but people need to stop fucking around on 2 person wagons and get to voting some people up

My candidate is Holden. Get onboard or tell me why I’m wrong

That’s @evwryone

In post 379, Menalque wrote:

In post 376, Umlaut wrote:Would you explain where that vote is coming from?

Feel like Holden has very much disappeared from the game as a presence after having done just enough to seem like town + he’s voting me which is a wagon I would expect a scum to have gotten on

But town is just as likely to go on that wagon.

Yes, I’m sure there would be a mix, Holden feels like a good place to start

I just noticed HoldenGolden is on V/LA. That might explain his absence.

Fredrick why are you seemingly actively opposed to building a wagon?

In post 385, Menalque wrote:Fredrick why are you seemingly actively opposed to building a wagon?

I'm not. I am just doing what you asked of everyone, which is to "Get onboard or tell me why I’m wrong".

Okay, only you’re not telling me why Holden is town you’re just resisting the push

The main point against him is not that he’s voting me, that’s supporting why I think he’s scum, which is that I think he entered, did enough to make sure he wouldn’t be pressured and then evaporated which is i think a scum trajectory

And Holden is not VLA?

In post 387, Menalque wrote:Okay, only you’re not telling me why Holden is town you’re just resisting the push

You only told me to tell you why you might be wrong, not that he is town.

In post 389, Menalque wrote:And Holden is not VLA?

But when I clicked on "Activity overview", it says that he is.

I saw Menalque is in this game, so I thought I'd give him the pleasure of my company once again

For those unaware; the last game I was playing with Menalque has finished.. as in "a few hours ago".

Also special hi to RCE (long time since I last played you on your main)

Also also, hello to the rest of you.. etc

Now the best part is I'm here to save the day. The worst part is I'm not sure I can do it without sinking the ship down. I mean, that's the only way to guarantee them baddies won't escape. Right??

I will catch up in a few, should be an easy/short catch up since it's only see 16 pages, and I have a sinking feeling that at least half of it is rubbish.

In post 389, Menalque wrote:And Holden is not VLA?

He has his V/LA flag set on his profile until, um, today. I don't think he stated in thread he was going V/LA.

Also: Hi, A50. Looking forward to your catch-up.

In post 393, Almost50 wrote:I have a sinking feeling that at least half of it is rubbish.

Oh boy are we ready to disappoint you monkeyman

Umlaut, can you join me on Holden please?

In post 371, Umlaut wrote:I haven't made an omelette in quite a while, but I do have some ham in the fridge so I may have to do that later! Thanks for the suggestion.

The thought of Umlaut eating an omelette brings me joy.

I've been feeling pretty detached to this game so I don't really feel strongly about anything. Also some people ignored my questions. I'm gonna try and reread soon though and see if I can get a better feel.

~Eva

In the meantime, how about a vote for Holden?

-