Mafiascum.net

In post 325, Andresvmb wrote: Being laid back is indicative of Scum because?

because town usually rush to find maf and are eager.

In post 369, WaltertheDunce10 wrote: Why do you believe it is too early to have a hard stance?

It's D1. Personalities can be faked, lynches cannot.

In post 369, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:

In post 354, Nash wrote:

In post 344, Andresvmb wrote:Give me a reason to TR you Nash.

I think it's too early to have hard stances. What makes you think I'm detached?

Why do you believe it is too early to have a hard stance?

This was not directed to you at all our, yet you felt the need to answer , how curious.

In post 369, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:

In post 354, Nash wrote:

In post 344, Andresvmb wrote:Give me a reason to TR you Nash.

I think it's too early to have hard stances. What makes you think I'm detached?

Why do you believe it is too early to have a hard stance?

No one has pinged me either way yet.
Not to be confused with not having any stances at all though.



@Clarity, how did Andresvmb's recent posts affect your PoE?
@NS, how do you read TB now?

Are we allowed to talk about jankofan?

Can you tell me a bit more about clarity?

depends on what about jankofan you want to talk about? If it’s about like why he replaced out probably not, but I think anything else goes?

I don't think speculation about a newbie replace our is helpful of conclusive and like....that has my Spidey sense pinging.

Bellaphant wrote:I don't think speculation about a newbie replace our is helpful of conclusive and like....that has my Spidey sense pinging.

whats scummy about wanting to talk about it?

In post 382, Bellaphant wrote:Can you tell me a bit more about clarity?

I think her reads are pretty vague in a way that can be faked easily as scum.

she's not very... clear

Because 'the newbie replaced our because he didn't like scum' is a really easy fait-accompli. You know that.

i kind of think Nash is null leaning town now

In post 378, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:

In post 369, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:

In post 354, Nash wrote:

In post 344, Andresvmb wrote:Give me a reason to TR you Nash.

I think it's too early to have hard stances. What makes you think I'm detached?

Why do you believe it is too early to have a hard stance?

This was not directed to you at all our, yet you felt the need to answer , how curious.

what's curious about it? is there a read here? he's been doing it all game too (responding to questions directed at other people)

Just that he felt the need to so it raised my eyebrows to take a another look.
Why did our want to answer that is what was going through my head.

In post 379, Nash wrote:@NS, how do you read TB now?

Town?

Maybe?

STill havent reread will hopefully have time tonight but I have stuff to do all day.

In post 381, Nash wrote:VOTE: innocentvillager

What do you make of the fact that IV is voting for Clarity?

@Clarity where you able to read this morning? Do you have updated thoughts on The Bulge?

not sure what to make of bella's dismissiveness without somebody else's input but I'm wary. maybe this isn't the time.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: iv

actually UNVOTE:
VOTE: walter

walter's last couple posts in particular have been very lazy and felt opportunistic. his iso is riddled with similar questions and comments actually. I recently played a game where scumwalter's presence was similar, always seeming to be the one to ask the questions everyone sees but nobody bothers asking.

walter were you under the impression that this was ouroel's first time answering a question not directed at him this game?

In post 396, The Bulge wrote:actually UNVOTE:
VOTE: walter

walter's last couple posts in particular have been very lazy and felt opportunistic. his iso is riddled with similar questions and comments actually. I recently played a game where scumwalter's presence was similar, always seeming to be the one to ask the questions everyone sees but nobody bothers asking.

walter were you under the impression that this was ouroel's first time answering a question not directed at him this game?

It was the first time I had noticed it.
It annoys me though because it can affect the answer a person gives and then our jumps in with the answer which affects a read of that person for me by making it inaccurate or not in their words.
It does not seem like a town action to me Iv, why feel the need to hop in so to speak.
I am not sure it comes from a town mindset.
maybe eager new town.

I have been busy with other games also.
Andres is now town.
Nash I dropped down to neutral due to his response to te self vote and another double vote along with Jankofan needing to be brought up.
I am having a really hard time getting a good read on ns and IV though.
Not science in particular as I read his iso and nothing stood out as a town stance, just a bunch of questions and short answers.
Bella is now slight scum for me. Something rubs me odd about the interaction between you and her. More on bella than you though
Bulge, I think you might be town but that impression has only improved with your recent posts.
Notscience, in 242 you unvoted and said to put your 'vote" on bella while waiting for a vc.
Then the vc comes up in 250 and you had a post soon after that.
Why did you not vote then upon seeing the vc?
Since then you have not voted again, is there a reason why?
VOTE: Notscience

pedit Clarity slot I see has replaced.
Welcome Bell.



.