What if we wagoned someone who has actually confirmed? VOTE: ydrasse
In post 36, Kerset wrote:This game is 4p masonry and ydra is one of us. Any vote placed against masonry will be considered as treachery and punished with death.
Are you really suggesting that these are similar? ND’s claim is perfectly dry and arguably understandable from town, whereas kerset’s is like incredibly obviously joking and would be deeply anti-town if true
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:44 am
by PlusJOYED
Yes those are one and the same
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:45 am
by PlusJOYED
He could just as easily have a dry sense of humor
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:45 am
by Menalque
In post 41, PlusJOYED wrote:[srs] Ydrasse is giving me subtle scumvibes rn.
They seem ... nervous? This is all gut feel and first impression though. It is the start of the game after all.
Also I’m like confused here plusjoy by you not getting my reads when apparently you had the exact same response to two of the people I’ve given opinions on?
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:46 am
by Menalque
They’re like... really obviously not one and the same?
“This is me claiming aesthetic.” is meaningfully different from “Any votes placed against the masonry will be considered as treachery”
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:46 am
by PlusJOYED
Menal is giving me weird vibes atm, not sure if alignment indicative or just how they are. For those who have played with menal before, what do you think about them?
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:47 am
by Menalque
In post 38, Kerset wrote:Mason PT decided to rule the town through dictatorship. We need 3 player, which will collaborate with us to execute anyone we want.
Also following up with this is like... this is super obv a joke bc if we ACTUALLY had a 4p masonry then there would be like one other PR at most I think and scum would have like a huge advantage from knowing that their main job is mason hunting
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:48 am
by Menalque
Whereas claiming ascetic is something that you can arguably do as town to try to save yourself from power, but which is definitely a debateavle thing to claim in your first post
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:48 am
by PlusJOYED
In post 380, Menalque wrote:They’re like... really obviously not one and the same?
“This is me claiming aesthetic.” is meaningfully different from “Any votes placed against the masonry will be considered as treachery”
just ... no. This feels super closed minded. It was in RVS for Christ's sake, what player would seriously claim there
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:50 am
by Menalque
Wait, have I been writing aesthetic and not ascetic... Ffs
Literally tons??? And like again, ascetic is one of exactly two roles that theory is that you would claim with
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:50 am
by innocentvillager
i am on menas side here those do feel different
It is not anti town to claim ascetic
It is obviously is to claim mason and that was a lol claim
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:51 am
by Menalque
Like the two roles there’s a case for claiming off the bat are miller and ascetic
In post 41, PlusJOYED wrote:[srs] Ydrasse is giving me subtle scumvibes rn.
They seem ... nervous? This is all gut feel and first impression though. It is the start of the game after all.
Also I’m like confused here plusjoy by you not getting my reads when apparently you had the exact same response to two of the people I’ve given opinions on?
That was first 2 pages, I've changed my mind on them since then so now I TR them
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:56 am
by PlusJOYED
Well I've never played a game with an aesthic claim in it but the wiki says they like to claim off the bat like millers. I still don't take the claim seriously but I will if NDMath doubles down on said claim.
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:56 am
by Menalque
Okay, but that doesn’t change the fact that it’s weird for you to say you don’t get a read that I explicitly stated was based on first impressions when your first impression was apparently the exact same thing?
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 3:59 am
by PlusJOYED
I'm not saying your first impression is wrong for you to have I just disagree with it and wanted to discuss it
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:00 am
by Menalque
Why are people voting IV?
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:00 am
by Menalque
In post 392, PlusJOYED wrote:I'm not saying your first impression is wrong for you to have I just disagree with it and wanted to discuss it
Not but I’m saying
Why did you call out my first impressions/pings as weird/bad when I had the same first impressions as you did? Or like similar ones? That’s what I’m not getting
Posted: Wed Sep 09, 2020 4:03 am
by PlusJOYED
NDMath first impression is the one that made no sense to me since I didn't realize aesthetic claim right off the bat sometimes but now I get it.