https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
told yall he was townIn post 370, tris wrote:this gives me town pingsIn post 287, UnaBombaH wrote:Or at least acting weird, yea.In post 253, Nero Cain wrote:you but EV is apparently a 2016 join date too. Yeah you're both pretty scummy.
But so far surface-level, kneejerk reaction, first impression gutreads seem to be the thing anyway, so..
But the weren't even in the game yet! It's not lurking if you forgot about the game entirely! this is stupidIn post 320, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t feel like my concerns have been fully addressedIn post 310, Alchemist21 wrote:Ok but is there a reason you’re still choosing Ico at this point?In post 271, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t only vote if I’m highly confident about a read. That’s the common course on my homesite, but I’ve played so much here vs. over there that I’m more inclined to apply my vote in aims of sorting people.
Icon also started posting in Kids With Lungs in response to pressure D2, so I don’t think becoming more active in response to pressure here is particularly Town-indicative. I think you probably took your vote off too early.
Not really aorn, but I'll have a go at rereading the thread tomorrow.In post 379, tris wrote:Egix, do you have anything to say about anyone other than echo and nero?
This is such a vague statementIn post 375, tris wrote:i'm not liking this developing echo wagon
like what concerns? it looked like you were just voting there because it hadn't posted. what do you expect iconeum to address now?In post 320, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t feel like my concerns have been fully addressedIn post 310, Alchemist21 wrote:Ok but is there a reason you’re still choosing Ico at this point?In post 271, Gamma Emerald wrote:I don’t only vote if I’m highly confident about a read. That’s the common course on my homesite, but I’ve played so much here vs. over there that I’m more inclined to apply my vote in aims of sorting people.
i'm confused by this answer. how has it been fine? i thought you liked nero's case.In post 351, SirCakez wrote:Fine? It's sitting on ico which is whatever.In post 350, Gamma Emerald wrote:I do have one question, though
SirCakez, what do you make of how I’ve used my vote up to now?
yes Tris. Everything everyone says is 100% true and never a lie.In post 377, tris wrote:But the weren't even in the game yet! It's not lurking if you forgot about the game entirely! this is stupid
In post 356, EchoVision wrote:you got upset cause someone called you newbtown and had a passive aggressive, emotionally charged remark
lol wutIn post 272, Datisi wrote:on site for almost a year and a half, getting called newbtown...
ye pretty much, preferred vote at the time had too many votes and i don't like unvoting without votingIn post 359, EchoVision wrote:thisis where you voted me in the first place, which doesn't seem like it was because you scum read me (at the time)
you were just jumpin around and happened to find something that you liked, because i didn't answer your question the way you wanted me to
i didn't think you were scum because of "statistics", i just couldn't sleep at night if i didn't call that outIn post 361, EchoVision wrote:mind you, they were statistics that you said the bolded but go offIn post 360, EchoVision wrote:oh and then you thought i was scum because of my fantastic statisticsIn post 241, Datisi wrote:you were just... randomly calling people town?
also i feel obligated to point out that of you're town, the odds of a random other player also being town are 8/11, not 9/12
i don't think this is a legit scumslipbut i could be persuaded otherwise
that's what i'm saying. it's not AIIn post 388, Nero Cain wrote:and even if he was telling the truth about forgetting about this game thats not exactly AI.
i do actually want to know this thoughIn post 389, Datisi wrote: echovision why are you voting testa i wanna know
In post 251, Nero Cain wrote:Also there are only 2 scum but thats besides the point.
is this a traitor?In post 259, Nero Cain wrote:I'm clearly scum that slipped.
absolutely no reason i just felt like itIn post 392, tris wrote:i do actually want to know this thoughIn post 389, Datisi wrote: echovision why are you voting testa i wanna know
Yes, I meant more in regards with your earlier interactions, the misrep later stands for itself, there isn't much room to argue.In post 353, Nero Cain wrote: ???
you could argue the stuff about him "joking" with me is subjective but his misrep of cakes content is an objective fact so...he's pretty scummy.
Ah, gotcha with tris. Nah, I am not trying to argue that Alch is null, I was rather interested in your insight how you came to that conclusion as for me the reasons you wrote looked nai to me. However it's probably just because I generally don't agree with the argument inactive with zero posts = scummy, particularly in this case with Ico as by what I got to know about Ico so far with playing with him it seems a bit comical and a pretty stark contrast that he would be so shy as scum that he wouldn't post at all.In post 353, Nero Cain wrote: When I said I was mindmelding with Alch I actually meant his stuff about Tris. I'm a little confused though if you can see why my 228 would make me town read Alch why then are you asking about it? Are you trying to argue that he's null? I mean, the answer is of course that he certainlyCOULDthrow down a vote on an inactive slot but, and maybe I'm just projecting here, but Ico not posting here was scummy and thus I think its a pretty good vote. Players that are "lurking" get ran up all the time b/c lurkingisa viable scum strategy. OFC, the flip side is that he's just scum and threw down a vote on an inactive slot since its somewhat safe to do so but we are both seeing the Tris thing similarly so that sorta makes me feel like he's also town.
actually, this answer doesn't talk about what i was thinking when i posted that. these thoughts came later as i read more.In post 382, tris wrote:i think echo is more likely town. just because you hate his playstyle, doesn't make him mafia. and he's stopped being like that, and is actually contributing now. and, i like what he has said in that time. it seems like townie thoughts.
Fine as in I don't see anything explicitly wrong with it but I also don't think it's goodIn post 385, tris wrote:i'm confused by this answer. how has it been fine? i thought you liked nero's case.In post 351, SirCakez wrote:Fine? It's sitting on ico which is whatever.In post 350, Gamma Emerald wrote:I do have one question, though
SirCakez, what do you make of how I’ve used my vote up to now?