Mafiascum.net

In post 373, Scipio1 wrote: ben

Overall a pretty towny playerlist, considering the bottom four in my readlist are ben and three hard nulls.

Have your reasons for voting me changed at all?

Not really.

Mainly that post which felt forced + unproactiveness/not much actual content + feeling the need to justify that unproactiveness

In post 368, implosion wrote:

In post 333, Datisi wrote:hot fucking take:
327 is literally the most ai post that slot has made so far
also it's town!indicative

Why is it town indicative? I can buy it being the most useful thing they've said but it seems like it could be scum annoyed at a consensus townread and trying to contest it without really contesting it.

ok this is gonna be a bit of a messy read but hear me out. note that i have some ~25 games with dragon at this point.

the last game we played together was mini normal 2180, where he was scum and i was town. he only started posting on day 2 (because reasons) and soon afterwards i was able to tell that Something was Wrong there. post 327 here is a complete 180 from his entire play in that game, it just reads as such genuine ~paranoia~. the thought of trying to undermine the consensus townread did cross my mind for a second, but (1) i'm p sure he knows it's gonna take much more than a vague paranoia shot at me to get that execution, and (2) right after, he's calling out townpings on me and calling my takes townie. doesn't make sense.

unless it was specifically made to pocket me, i don't see that post being made from scum!ico, and gut is strongly telling me it wasn't.

VOTE: ben dover not really SRing him, but not townreading him either and I like the wagon composition

in other news, scipio is still pretty townie. i think his reasons for towreading people aren't actually that solid - it's only gonna be so long before he gets badly burned for using "scum would be more self-conscious here" - but y'know i think it's coming from a genuine place so it is what it is.

I will say if isis was being "too scummy to be scum" on purpose, she chose a good plist in which to do so.

Ffs

-QB

UNVOTE:

Chill out, we're less than 2 days in and someone's already been put at E-2.

In post 379, Datisi wrote:in other news, scipio is still pretty townie. i think his reasons for towreading people aren't actually that solid - it's only gonna be so long before he gets badly burned for using "scum would be more self-conscious here" - but y'know i think it's coming from a genuine place so it is what it is.

Why would we chill out when we could make that E-2 an E-1?

-QB

Although, in fairness, I had forgotten that N_M was among us which does make E-2 E-1 in effective terms

-QB

:thonk:

Is that how things work on this site?

I mean... it can be

Why is having people at E-2 early a bad thing?

Also, where are you from? (Site wise, last post makes it sound like you play elsewhere)

-QB

Idk, just don't wanna accidentally quickhammer this early.

https://artofproblemsolving.com/community/c49_mafia

Ohhhh, you’re an art of problem solving arrival, okay, that makes sense I guess

-QB

I've quickhammered on page 2...sometimes it just happens.

VOTE: ben

NM's E-1

(that's E-2)

That's "NM's E-1."

I thought I was pretty clear on that.

It wasn't clear to me but ok

Saying "NM's E-1" below the vote wasn't clear to you but saying it a second time cleared it up?

When I read "NM's E-1" a second time I realized there was a second interpretation that wasn't the way I interpreted it the first time

"The E-1 that NM can hammer on" vs "E-2, which should be treated as E-1 with NM in the game"

ah, that's fair