Mafiascum.net

fucked up the quotes whoops

In post 366, oʍo wrote:

In post 363, Saudade wrote:next person to back up their opinion via a vibe check will be sent to the shadowrealm to join looker

u literally used to play on a website where people locked people on vibes based on a single line LMAO relax

And I was pretty damn good at it, alas this isnt a chatbox but a forum so back down

In post 374, ManateeDude wrote: do tell then! if ur looking for motivation behind my posts you should be seeking out a possible buddy instead of vaguely mentioning it as a possibility

I already have.

In post 173, Roden wrote:

In post 137, oʍo wrote:

In post 135, ManateeDude wrote:general consensus seems to be a dislike of their entry which i think is pretty nai

translation: stop wagoning my partner for wrong reasons

In post 102, oʍo wrote:Hero solve: Max + Manatee + Marci

How serious is this?

In post 277, Roden wrote:

In post 271, ManateeDude wrote:VOTE: Roden

i think ur getting way too defensive considering the people calling u out r not even full on saying ur wolfy

Lmao. Everyone loves to pull the defensive card every time somebody responds to a scum read. This is essentially a non-post. And with the vote attached it's basically a naked vote.

I wonder if you're trying to draw away attention from Marci and Max after all.

In post 359, Roden wrote:

In post 309, ManateeDude wrote:responding prematurely and snarkily to a single scumread meets my definition of "too defensive"

Why haven't you accused Marci then? She got accused multiple times and just responded with GIFs. She even admitted she doesn't feel like responding to them, which is honestly worse than getting defensive. Not even IMO, just objectively that is worse to ignore accusations and drown them out with memes.

In post 353, ManateeDude wrote:saudade talk to me abt titus vote

If day ends right this moment and i have to pick a target itd be titus

in response to marci while i dont have her at the top of my townreads i havent derived scum motivation and i also pressed your predecessor. its pretty obvious i was trying to gage a reaction from you and i didnt need to do that with marci yet

In post 378, Saudade wrote:

In post 353, ManateeDude wrote:saudade talk to me abt titus vote

If day ends right this moment and i have to pick a target itd be titus

interesting. her iso is pretty barebones and im not a huge fan of the naked looker vote but besides theres really nothing to work with

Interesting to note that Max's last vote had her town lean Manatee ("trust me" is a horrible reason to do so btw), then abruptly stopped posting. Manatee then started throwing a bunch of suspicion around the moment Max started to lay low. It looks like somebody's buddy trying to get attention off of them after a rough start.

And again, Manatee seems to be giving Marci a free pass for things she's accused other people of doing. She won't even acknowledge it when I bring it up either.

PE:

ManateeDude wrote:in response to marci while i dont have her at the top of my townreads i havent derived scum motivation and i also pressed your predecessor. its pretty obvious i was trying to gage a reaction from you and i didnt need to do that with marci yet

Who's my predecessor?

And why don't you need to pressure Marci "yet"? Why is that time sensitive? Why can't you pressure more than one person at a time when I got scum read for not doing exactly that?

why did i think u replaced looker

why did i think u replaced looker

In post 378, Saudade wrote:

In post 353, ManateeDude wrote:saudade talk to me abt titus vote

If day ends right this moment and i have to pick a target itd be titus

Does scum!Titus usually play the way she has this game i.e. low key with sparse posts? Last mini normal she played as a "too good to be true" townie and won.

In post 380, ManateeDude wrote:

In post 378, Saudade wrote:

In post 353, ManateeDude wrote:saudade talk to me abt titus vote

If day ends right this moment and i have to pick a target itd be titus

interesting. her iso is pretty barebones and im not a huge fan of the naked looker vote but besides theres really nothing to work with

exactly, hence the vote =]

In post 381, Roden wrote:Interesting to note that Max's last vote had her town lean Manatee ("trust me" is a horrible reason to do so btw), then abruptly stopped posting. Manatee then started throwing a bunch of suspicion around the moment Max started to lay low. It looks like somebody's buddy trying to get attention off of them after a rough start.

And again, Manatee seems to be giving Marci a free pass for things she's accused other people of doing. She won't even acknowledge it when I bring it up either.

hmm, so do u actually think its me x manatee x max?

In post 384, Roden wrote:

In post 378, Saudade wrote:

In post 353, ManateeDude wrote:saudade talk to me abt titus vote

If day ends right this moment and i have to pick a target itd be titus

Does scum!Titus usually play the way she has this game i.e. low key with sparse posts? Last mini normal she played as a "too good to be true" townie and won.

idk ??

roden i think ur focusing on theorycrafting instead of reading.

u responded defensively to a vote on you. marci didnt respond in a way i scumread regardless of whether it was objectively good or bad

I'm giving myself 3 days to read Titus.

In post 386, marcistar wrote:

In post 381, Roden wrote:Interesting to note that Max's last vote had her town lean Manatee ("trust me" is a horrible reason to do so btw), then abruptly stopped posting. Manatee then started throwing a bunch of suspicion around the moment Max started to lay low. It looks like somebody's buddy trying to get attention off of them after a rough start.

And again, Manatee seems to be giving Marci a free pass for things she's accused other people of doing. She won't even acknowledge it when I bring it up either.

hmm, so do u actually think its me x manatee x max?

I'm not being given much of a reason to think otherwise atm. Why are the three of you so opposed to scum reading each other?

In post 387, Saudade wrote:

In post 384, Roden wrote:

In post 378, Saudade wrote:

In post 353, ManateeDude wrote:saudade talk to me abt titus vote

If day ends right this moment and i have to pick a target itd be titus

Does scum!Titus usually play the way she has this game i.e. low key with sparse posts? Last mini normal she played as a "too good to be true" townie and won.

idk ??

Oh. I thought that's what you were trying to lead into, whoops.

No I barely remember anyone on this website let alone remember entire games

I am having trouble reading people so I'm sheeping my mason buddy.
VOTE: Titus

In post 388, ManateeDude wrote:roden i think ur focusing on theorycrafting instead of reading.

u responded defensively to a vote on you. marci didnt respond in a way i scumread regardless of whether it was objectively good or bad

What theory crafting? I looked at your interactions after you literally told me to do so.

Your refusal to even look at Marci is what's pinging me. You actually got very defensive of her yourself when I voted her. Why is that?

In post 392, Dwlee99 wrote:I am having trouble reading people so I'm sheeping my mason buddy.
VOTE: Titus

You can be the Kim to my Harry

In post 390, Roden wrote:Why are the three of you so opposed to scum reading each other?

should i scumread people who i dont actually think are scum???

-i feel sort of like max needs to post more before i would be able to have a confident read on them
-manatee, i had a fairly big townread on before, but im not as sure anymore as of recently. ^.^

In post 393, Roden wrote:

In post 388, ManateeDude wrote:roden i think ur focusing on theorycrafting instead of reading.

u responded defensively to a vote on you. marci didnt respond in a way i scumread regardless of whether it was objectively good or bad

What theory crafting? I looked at your interactions after you literally told me to do so.

Your refusal to even look at Marci is what's pinging me. You actually got very defensive of her yourself when I voted her. Why is that?

i literally just clarified a pretty obvious point that u didn't read properly? im not sure how that adds up to "very defensive"

^_^

uwu

Roden i think ur theorycrafting bc ur reading into normal interactions on a way deeper level