Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2021 12:55 pm
and, MegAzumarill is v/la till Sunaday
Yup, and the one time I’ve seen scum actually seemingly put in an effort, it was clearly a load of bunkIn post 374, Alchemist21 wrote:I agree with you, scum very rarely metadive anyone because they have no need to and don’t feel like spending the energy reading other games.In post 372, Datisi wrote:still shelfing this as Town For Effort for now because idk why scum!t3 does this. i feel like i've heard somewhere that scum!t3 likes to do townreads on townies but this feels a bit unnecessary. idk.
The town read thing I think is more that Scum!T3 just does not give his partners town reads. In the 4 or so t3 scum games I have looked at, the best his partners have ever gotten was null I believe.In post 372, Datisi wrote:still shelfing this as Town For Effort for now because idk why scum!t3 does this. i feel like i've heard somewhere that scum!t3 likes to do townreads on townies but this feels a bit unnecessary. idk.
I would not be surprised to see scum doing a meta dive to justify a scum read, but this is for a day 1 town read lolIn post 374, Alchemist21 wrote:I agree with you, scum very rarely metadive anyone because they have no need to and don’t feel like spending the energy reading other games.In post 372, Datisi wrote:still shelfing this as Town For Effort for now because idk why scum!t3 does this. i feel like i've heard somewhere that scum!t3 likes to do townreads on townies but this feels a bit unnecessary. idk.
There was one time he gave a partner a townread but it was for “meta reasons” which was why the unexplained Datisi meta TR made me insta-vote himIn post 378, Lukewarm wrote:The town read thing I think is more that Scum!T3 just does not give his partners town reads. In the 4 or so t3 scum games I have looked at, the best his partners have ever gotten was null I believe.In post 372, Datisi wrote:still shelfing this as Town For Effort for now because idk why scum!t3 does this. i feel like i've heard somewhere that scum!t3 likes to do townreads on townies but this feels a bit unnecessary. idk.
But yeah, I cannot imagine scum!T3 going to this much effort to make a town read, when he could just as easily just call you a gut town read, or agree with my reasons that I just gave, or come up with something else from this game. Digging into 3 of your past games and counting the number of times you quote people in each seems like a lot of wasted effort for scum!T3.
i would like to point out that this is not the case. it's not just about you being v/la and not following the game closely, my issue is that your post seemed like textbook scum who isn't active making a post that seems vaguely solvey but it's actually ~air~. i had this tell come up in a recent town game of mine, i can find the links later if needed, it is still fresh in my mind which is why i jumped when i saw the postIn post 382, MegAzumarill wrote:I would like to point out that the initial push on me is due to factor's outside of the game itself. (I.e. the distance from me to the game due to V/LA)
Combing through Flubber's ISO I found this. I have a hard time believing Flubber thought Seanzie was actually pushing Alch.In post 112, Flubbernugget wrote:so I don't think seanzie is literally scumreading someone for posting more. I think they're trying to manufacture a push and doing it poorly. so the only thing they could shade alchemist for was "posting". seems like I'm right too, because in elaborating, they're now saying things that are just...wrongIn post 36, Umlaut wrote:A non-ridiculous reading is "there is something in Alchemist's posts that Seanzie didn't like and he's being coy about what exactly" and not "posting = bad," and I have a hard time believing the latter is really what you thought he meant even for a second.
More votes on Flub plz
Hmmm...townish hereIn post 241, Gamma Emerald wrote:anyone have questions for me?
If we're right, I am a total jerk, sorry not sorry.In post 289, T3 wrote:Oh, I know what's going on.In post 274, Gamma Emerald wrote:Before I post my reasons for TRing Aristeia, I have a bit of an odd question for Datisi:
Would you rather be a one-shot bulletproof or one-shot vigilante?
*facepalm* You have the subtlety of a jackhammer and that's coming from ME!In post 305, Gamma Emerald wrote:How so? The more you evade, the more I’ll be convinced of my own picture of the situation, and trust me, it wouldn’t be a good one for you.In post 302, T3 wrote:I shouldn't say.
I'm ok withIn post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
T3 literally metaed the fuck out of a lurker and I coasted on that to get town to a 3p lylo where I blew it but still I trust his metaIn post 344, Gamma Emerald wrote:VOTE: T3In post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
You should know not to try this around me
The vote only comes off if a satisfactory explanation is given as to why and how this happened.
All the people above, please suggest my tier 2 townies tyiaIn post 388, Titus wrote:I'm ok withIn post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.
I don't know what you are saying here, can you rephrase?In post 393, Titus wrote:All the people above, please suggest my tier 2 townies tyiaIn post 388, Titus wrote:I'm ok withIn post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.
The names I have listed are my locktowns.In post 394, Lukewarm wrote:I don't know what you are saying here, can you rephrase?In post 393, Titus wrote:All the people above, please suggest my tier 2 townies tyiaIn post 388, Titus wrote:I'm ok withIn post 335, T3 wrote:After a meta skim on Datisi I'm comfortable locktowning him.
Datisti Gamma T3 Lukewarm Flubber all being town.
I see. This is about where I am at (sperate lines are sorted, but each line is not sorted)In post 395, Titus wrote:The names I have listed are my locktowns.
I want y'all to fill out the no lim pool.
Then we go to town and axe murder someone.
Relatable opinion. If there was a choice between those two, I'd see your point. It's Flubber v Meg though and a scum vote is better than a town one.In post 398, Lukewarm wrote:I have a strong preference to a Chaos > Meg elim day 1.
I think that they are both about equally scummy, but Meg having actually no opinions in thread means that we don't get any associatives from a Meg flip.