Page 16 of 51

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:55 am
by Hectic
Someone else must've signed in before you could and hijacked the account, don't blame me

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:57 am
by Toogeloo
In post 372, Hectic wrote:Generally, scum like to keep their options open more. Means they have less explaining/faking to do on progressions down the line if they need to scumread someone they previous townread or vice versa

I think the main reason it's scum-indicative though is that most scum feel taking a hard stance one way or another feels more risky, and is more prone to criticism/suspicion. Being open on the read feels like the safer route which is harder to scumread for specific points
And yet you town read me because I have vague reads (I could literally name any three people at any time since) and am WIFOMing the player list that I want to be shot.

/winkyface

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:57 am
by Toogeloo
I'll throw you a bone.

One of the three people I would shoot immediately upon getting the gun is T3.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:58 am
by Hectic
In post 366, Toogeloo wrote:I've been known to die on a lot of hills. It's not outside my scum range lol.
In post 376, Toogeloo wrote:
In post 372, Hectic wrote:Generally, scum like to keep their options open more. Means they have less explaining/faking to do on progressions down the line if they need to scumread someone they previous townread or vice versa

I think the main reason it's scum-indicative though is that most scum feel taking a hard stance one way or another feels more risky, and is more prone to criticism/suspicion. Being open on the read feels like the safer route which is harder to scumread for specific points
And yet you town read me because I have vague reads (I could literally name any three people at any time since) and am WIFOMing the player list that I want to be shot.

/winkyface
Oi, are you trying to be scumread for posts like these

It makes me want to townread you more

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 5:59 am
by Hectic
In post 377, Toogeloo wrote:I'll throw you a bone.

One of the three people I would shoot immediately upon getting the gun is T3.
Would you also throw me the meat on the bone and explain why that is?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:01 am
by Toogeloo
Look at it this way. If I don't get shot, then if I'm town, I'm still doing my job.

As for T3, I'll just simply say that I didn't like a majority of his early game interactions.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:04 am
by Toogeloo
Luke is a saint though, and I would never shoot there.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:14 am
by Enchant
What did i miss?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:34 am
by Toogeloo
So, here's why votes and being town read is a fallacy in this game.

Scum CANNOT kill another player. Town does all the killing. So a player who is almost universally town read can live forever in this game. A potential scenario (and in actuality, one of the best plays they can do) for a scum win includes one of them bussing the ever living crap out of the rest of their team and convincing gun owners to shoot scum teammates along with town. This gives the bussing scum member some value of longevity in the game since it's a known fact that scum cannot eliminate threats to them. There can't be a scenario in a game like this where the gunowner questions why the most town read player is still alive, because scum can't kill the most town read players anyways. A player who makes it to endgame who helped decide the fate of 1 or more scum is still just as likely scum as whoever else is in endgame.

It is 100% on the gunbearer, and their ability to read and trust themselves to make the decision that they think is best for the town win, and not a good idea to trust votes, or how a target consensus was reached. This is why the game is more akin to something like Bad Idea.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:37 am
by Toogeloo
Gunbearer works better in the hands of players who are more likely to not give a shit about town reads and votes, and the best shots are the ones where you trust yourself and your gut and don't second guess yourself or allow yourself to be directed in any manner.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:39 am
by Toogeloo
Last thing I'm going to say is that I have a very slight suspicion that T3 scum slipped a partner, but I'd need T3 to flip scum first before I divulge my suspicion and why. If I had the gun, I'd just shoot T3 and then follow up with the second shot if I was right.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:40 am
by Enchant
In post 323, Pavowski wrote:Saturday morning hot take:

I'm still sitting in null on too many people: Toogelo, Vulture, Enchant.

To those 3: who would you absolutely not shoot today if you were holding the gun?
I just realised, if i get gun, my shot is deciding.
Don't give it to me, too late. I will screw up i think.


If i am somehow still chosen, Macsi looks like typical shapegoat and i think she is in real town. Art impossible to read and i would not risk shot him.

Others is fair game.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:41 am
by Hectic
In post 310, Galron wrote:Most likely. I'm going to take the full day and shoot based on votes, as if it were a launch.
I mean, I didn't want say just yet why this is a terrible idea, but yeah, Toog's right, Galron

There are 4 scum, letting them influence your decision via votes is a really bad idea

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:42 am
by Enchant
I will ask blunt.

Who even thinks T3 is town.
Anyone?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:42 am
by Vulture
Who's Marci the scapegoat for?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:44 am
by HockeyFan
In post 388, Enchant wrote:I will ask blunt.

Who even thinks T3 is town.
Hi! I have him as a slight TR
Anyone?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 6:47 am
by Enchant
I know how this feeling.

For mafia overall.

I don't think she is competent with gun, no offense.
And she also have notstandart game for which she get scumreaded, but actually i don't think mafia would act so outrageous.

I really think, she obvious for try to force her as shot target, because she is easy gain suspiciouns and can quickly lose game via random.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 7:03 am
by marcistar
In post 324, Pavowski wrote:Why are you scumreading Enchant?
his iso is horrible :yawn:
(, , ) + he didn't respond to too much from the pages, even though theres a decent amount to build off of so far. it doesn't look like hes pushing anything, doesnt look like hes solving.

yw for the hard carry :yawn:
In post 330, Hectic wrote:I'm suspicious of players who have voiced minimal or few scumreads, despite the fact there are FOUR scumazzers out and about from a town player's perspective. Players that fall under this category include T3, marcistar, Toogeloo, and probably others

It's probably pretty difficult for scum to voice many scumreads here, given they either have to choose in the limited pool of townies, or give scumreads on their buds
im sus?? :oops: :oops:
the reason i dont give reads is my confidence is nonexistent :roll: :oops: :oops:
In post 330, Hectic wrote:Could everyone give 3 or 4 players they think are scum, and why?
sir i like just woke up so this is a struggle for me

prob vulture, for things idk how to explain :cool: :cool: haha gottem

i dont like pavowski when hes like "based on meta marcis prob town but my gut says shes scum here anyways" something like that that he keeps bringing up to back himself up, but otherwise he seems decently fine.
In post 341, Hectic wrote:Anyways, it feel like marci is the best shot here.
Image
In post 341, Hectic wrote:Since then, she's almost seemed a little afraid to express many reads/thoughts.
prob cuz i am :oops: :oops:
In post 341, Hectic wrote:But we have tiiiimeee, so marci, if you're not scum, give us a power star; talk about your reads etc
PLS SMSSKSMSK THIS IS SO FUNNY
i dont have too much reads, and im sure not confident enough in them to do anything with it :cool: :cool:
In post 391, Enchant wrote:I don't think she is competent with gun, no offense.
rude i think im fine :roll: :roll:

can u give ur opinions on other people enchant :yawn:

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 7:13 am
by Galron
In post 387, Hectic wrote:
In post 310, Galron wrote:Most likely. I'm going to take the full day and shoot based on votes, as if it were a launch.
I mean, I didn't want say just yet why this is a terrible idea, but yeah, Toog's right, Galron

There are 4 scum, letting them influence your decision via votes is a really bad idea
I have a pool. I want to see if others see what I see.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 7:18 am
by Galron
In post 392, marcistar wrote:rude i think im fine
Marci, if you had the gun, how would you develop reads?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 7:19 am
by Hectic
How do you think you would be playing differently as scum, marci?

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:12 am
by T3
In post 330, Hectic wrote:Could everyone give 3 or 4 players they think are scum, and why?

I'm suspicious of players who have voiced minimal or few scumreads, despite the fact there are FOUR scumazzers out and about from a town player's perspective. Players that fall under this category include T3, marcistar, Toogeloo, and probably others

It's probably pretty difficult for scum to voice many scumreads here, given they either have to choose in the limited pool of townies, or give scumreads on their buds
If anything, this is town indicative for me. As town I usually prefer to form a townbloc early and then lim people in the PoE. For example, Open Draft Mafia or Large Normal 234 are my most recent towngames in which I did exactly this.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:18 am
by HockeyFan
In post 391, Enchant wrote:I know how this feeling.

For mafia overall.

I don't think she is competent with gun, no offense.
And she also have notstandart game for which she get scumreaded, but actually i don't think mafia would act so outrageous.

I really think, she obvious for try to force her as shot target, because she is easy gain suspiciouns and can quickly lose game via random.
:?:

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:24 am
by Enchant
In post 397, HockeyFan wrote:
In post 391, Enchant wrote:I know how this feeling.

For mafia overall.

I don't think she is competent with gun, no offense.
And she also have notstandart game for which she get scumreaded, but actually i don't think mafia would act so outrageous.

I really think, she obvious for try to force her as shot target, because she is easy gain suspiciouns and can quickly lose game via random.
:?:
She is simple easy target.

Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2021 10:32 am
by Pavowski
The chaotic energy of Marci's 392 is just :eek:

But specifically this:
marcistar wrote:
In post 341, Hectic wrote:But we have tiiiimeee, so marci, if you're not scum, give us a power star; talk about your reads etc
PLS SMSSKSMSK THIS IS SO FUNNY
i dont have too much reads, and im sure not confident enough in them to do anything with it :cool: :cool:
Do not like this response at all. Surely you have *something*?