Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2021 2:32 pm
ah damn i cant volume clear you lmfao
you posted the most despite dying d1LMFAO
you posted the most despite dying d1LMFAO
Indeed. I do not have a volume tell.In post 375, DkKoba wrote:ah damn i cant volume clear you lmfao
you posted the most despite dying d1LMFAO
Hey now that feels like a dig for no good reason.In post 18, NorwegianboyEE wrote: That post was just Wake being Wake.
Yeah, we get it, you're negative utility. Repeating yourself isn't gonna make it more special.In post 51, DkKoba wrote:im actually negative utility and its meta to claim it daystart - are you trying to imply its >rand scum by saying that?
Are you scum my guy?In post 171, Almost50 wrote:I ain't seeing no double negative nowhere!In post 22, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Just checking because double negative, but that's what I figured. Koba and Dwlee are just not nerds tho
OK so what is your Scum meta like?In post 73, Andresvmb wrote:I have to ask. I don’t want to have to fight you.In post 44, DkKoba wrote:weird thing to ask and you know whyIn post 30, Andresvmb wrote:@Koba are you Town? If you are, we can actually partner up for once.
Fine, you’ll have to figure out my alignment over time then, and I will have to figure out yours. You really could have just told me you know.
I'm assuming this vote was just RVS?In post 78, Loftwing wrote:Soaring into the game from the clouds, then crashes into a wall
..ow
...Anyway, hello everyone! I am Loftwing, your local neighborhood skylofty bird. I am here to pass judgement onto one of you.
VOTE: Hakai
Just a quick check on why you moved from Andre.
How can you call me scum and your guy in the same sentence??In post 379, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Are you scum my guy?
try actually reading the thread so you can understand the context xoxoIn post 378, Wake1 wrote:Yeah, we get it, you're negative utility. Repeating yourself isn't gonna make it more special.In post 51, DkKoba wrote:im actually negative utility and its meta to claim it daystart - are you trying to imply its >rand scum by saying that?
Why are you describing that readslist as strategic?In post 224, LicketyQuickety wrote:I know. That's exactly what I've been saying.In post 223, Loftwing wrote:LickeyQ, I think the reason why Dweelee the Intimidator is complaining at you is because you made a readlist with too many N/A spots.
Dwlee's read on me boils down to exactly that. I had too many nulls in my RL. IDK what Dwlee is expecting there. Are they thinking I shouldn't be making a RL at that point in the game? That's NOT what is being expressed. I could see if that was the reason why Dwlee was SRing me. I did that RL for a reason which I will not give at this point, but I did it for a reason. I think Dwlee has somehow latched onto the fact I made a strategic post and is SRing me for it. But I did it because I'm Town and am not going to talk about my reason for it more at this time.
I'm not going to talk about this.In post 387, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Why are you describing that readslist as strategic?In post 224, LicketyQuickety wrote:I know. That's exactly what I've been saying.In post 223, Loftwing wrote:LickeyQ, I think the reason why Dweelee the Intimidator is complaining at you is because you made a readlist with too many N/A spots.
Dwlee's read on me boils down to exactly that. I had too many nulls in my RL. IDK what Dwlee is expecting there. Are they thinking I shouldn't be making a RL at that point in the game? That's NOT what is being expressed. I could see if that was the reason why Dwlee was SRing me. I did that RL for a reason which I will not give at this point, but I did it for a reason. I think Dwlee has somehow latched onto the fact I made a strategic post and is SRing me for it. But I did it because I'm Town and am not going to talk about my reason for it more at this time.
+1.In post 84, LicketyQuickety wrote:I kinda disagree. I think it's NAI. Can you explain how it's Townie?In post 49, Hakai wrote:This defense seems weakly town.
It's called I'm at work catching up on the game.In post 385, DkKoba wrote:as is that reply just proved you're just skimming and picking out things to respond to
cryIn post 390, Wake1 wrote:It's called I'm at work catching up on the game.In post 385, DkKoba wrote:as is that reply just proved you're just skimming and picking out things to respond to
Take a Xanax and chill.
Yeah, but his reasons are trash.In post 391, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I dont think dwlee has this fire as scum. End of p10 rn. Hasn't looked like this since I was pushing them in that mini with mathblade we ended up winning
and when has bad reasoning been a consistent scumtell for finding scum ever?In post 393, LicketyQuickety wrote:Yeah, but his reasons are trash.In post 391, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I dont think dwlee has this fire as scum. End of p10 rn. Hasn't looked like this since I was pushing them in that mini with mathblade we ended up winning
No, I'm saying you can fake Conviction (TM) or you can have bad reasons. Usually if you have one without the other it doesn't do a whole lot for TRing them. People love to TR Conviction (TM) but they rarely SR bad reasons. I know, it's my specialty as Scum.In post 394, DkKoba wrote:and when has bad reasoning been a consistent scumtell for finding scum ever?In post 393, LicketyQuickety wrote:Yeah, but his reasons are trash.In post 391, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:I dont think dwlee has this fire as scum. End of p10 rn. Hasn't looked like this since I was pushing them in that mini with mathblade we ended up winning
Are you able to say why?
Because it was an RVS vote. They don't usually stick around very long.In post 343, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why should I expect them to Unvote at all?In post 341, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Why are you expecting a good reason to unvote an RVS vote?
Sure. But why unvote before voting someone else? Surely you can see my point here. People generally unvote when they stop SRing someone. That was not the case in this situation. In this situation, they didn't vote someone Scummier.In post 398, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Because it was an RVS vote. They don't usually stick around very long.In post 343, LicketyQuickety wrote:Why should I expect them to Unvote at all?In post 341, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:Why are you expecting a good reason to unvote an RVS vote?