Mafiascum.net

In post 370, Towelie wrote:how did [a bear or another bear] get from "i'm sheeping LLD and i'm explicitly stating i haven't read anything" to "i have a legitimate scumread on dunn"

-b

In post 370, Towelie wrote:how did [a bear or another bear] get from "i'm sheeping LLD and i'm explicitly stating i haven't read anything" to "i have a legitimate scumread on dunn"

-b

In post 371, Towelie wrote:I’m wondering how they’re scumreading gamma?

In post 374, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’d find it less weird if it was Noraa’s read but it’s Pooky’s, apparently

In post 375, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 370, Towelie wrote:how did [a bear or another bear] get from "i'm sheeping LLD and i'm explicitly stating i haven't read anything" to "i have a legitimate scumread on dunn"

-b

Good catch

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=13077688#p13077688]post 378[/url], Milk & Mocha wrote:

In post 374, Gamma Emerald wrote:I’d find it less weird if it was Noraa’s read but it’s Pooky’s, apparently

I don't disagree with it but apparently pooky is drunk or something so idk what his reasons are.

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=13077690#p13077690]post 379[/url], Milk & Mocha wrote:

In post 375, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 370, Towelie wrote:how did [a bear or another bear] get from "i'm sheeping LLD and i'm explicitly stating i haven't read anything" to "i have a legitimate scumread on dunn"

-b

Good catch

How is that a catch?

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=13077690#p13077690]post 379[/url], Milk & Mocha wrote:How is that a catch?

In post 380, Towelie wrote:i don't know what this even is

you're not being forced out of the game

you're not under a ton of pressure

bare minimum of clarity here would be cool

-b

In post 384, Dunnstral wrote:bear minimum, if you will

In post 383, Towelie wrote:

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=13077690#p13077690]post 379[/url], Milk & Mocha wrote:How is that a catch?

honestly i'm inclined to +1 this post; i'm not trying to gotcha anyone i just want explanations for shit lol

-b

In post 385, Towelie wrote:

In post 384, Dunnstral wrote:bear minimum, if you will

i will also +1 this post

-b

In post 364, Towelie wrote:As of this point I have varying degrees of strength townreads on (Mush, Ssbm-slot, gamma)

In post 380, Towelie wrote:i don't know what this even is

you're not being forced out of the game

you're not under a ton of pressure

bare minimum of clarity here would be cool

-b

In post 381, Gamma Emerald wrote:Are you at null or scum wrt me?

In post 60, Gamma Emerald wrote:That is interesting, but I don't think limming dunn is worth it atm
would scum have fakeclaims, possibly, but I'm mostly just confused why Dunn's immediate thought was to claim flavor out of the gate

In post 382, Dunnstral wrote:Their is an inconsistency in your stated stances.

Pooky being drunk didn't matter when they gave you reads, why does it make them unable to explain them?

In post 384, Dunnstral wrote:bear minimum, if you will

In post 386, Dunnstral wrote:What you pointed out was good and it doesn't make sense from them

In post 82, Towelie wrote:low complexity is not necessarily commensurate w/ normal, nor do i think cabd just started w/ a setup and haphazardly assigned roles to it.

That said, I don't think that makes Code Red slam dunk being a PR; this is analogous to the possibility assigning the protagonist of your flavor as a VT role in theme games, something that is well within the realm of what Cabd might do.

In post 73, Dunnstral wrote:Your actions are incomprehensible. All I know is that you are lying about your role.

How do you know she's lying? She hasn't even really said anything concrete yet.

In post 394, Towelie wrote:i don't feel like someone looks at your iso and takes you out of their poe pool so that's not really resonating with me
-b