Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:51 am
Pooky is half of F+G.In post 371, Enchant wrote:I just realised there's no Pooky in game.
Bingle fooled me to vote invisible person.
Pooky is half of F+G.In post 371, Enchant wrote:I just realised there's no Pooky in game.
Bingle fooled me to vote invisible person.
going by the european time, he should've been here about 8-9 hours ago until now. so either a really busy day, or the dragon is afraid of me.In post 373, VP Baltar wrote:Also, where's this dragon at?
He couldn’t put me at the top, that’s make the favoritism too obvious.In post 372, VP Baltar wrote:Second favorite
Ah makes sense why they not voting me instantly after "No" answer then.In post 375, Bingle wrote:Pooky is half of F+G.In post 371, Enchant wrote:I just realised there's no Pooky in game.
Bingle fooled me to vote invisible person.
RudeIn post 350, Enchant wrote:Imo if i had gun i would shot Sleepless Assassin.
I'm a pretty blank slate on the F&G slot at the moment, so I was just curious why you were having a reaction there.In post 374, Bingle wrote:Do you think that isn’t accurate? Why?
No, i really do think you're very good at reading ico, and that is playing into how i'm reading you + himIn post 365, Datisi wrote:i'm asking because i didn't want to take it at face value, considering you said it while you were scum. and i wanted to avoid potential future scenarios where you go "yes dats, i know you said you think ico is X but i didn't actually think you're good at reading him when i said it so i will now rather push Y".In post 343, Fun and Games wrote:Also why are you asking this ?In post 335, Datisi wrote:and, when you said that i have an extremely good read on ico in that last mini, were you being genuine, or?
Do you think i *shouldnt* think you're good at reading ico?
~ skitter
Ah i think i misunderstood what you meant by limbo, i thought you meant like game-wide and not just on dats/icoIn post 370, Bingle wrote:In post 292, Datisi wrote:i think 90 is still an up-to-date post on that, i'll get back to you when i have something solid@skitts: This feels like it’s going somewhere and I don’t want to step in it and taint the read, but it’s going somewhere really slowly.In post 99, Datisi wrote:ico, are you really surprised that i expected to have a read on you by this point?
same. >_>In post 381, Fun and Games wrote:Want to see that interaction plays out
Yes, i agree that you can read my play that way. Why is this scummy tho?In post 374, Bingle wrote:It’s more a pattern thing than a specific example thing. I suppose I can go look for why I feel that way in the first place, but my impression is that most of her play has been based around other people interacting with her and each other rather than her reaching out and poking others. Do you think that isn’t accurate? Why?In post 356, VP Baltar wrote:Can you cite some other examples where you think skitter has been reactive?
what about that post is scummy?In post 362, Enchant wrote:First post.VP Baltar wrote:Why?In post 350, Enchant wrote:Imo if i had gun i would shot Sleepless Assassin.
Yarp.In post 380, VP Baltar wrote:I'm a pretty blank slate on the F&G slot at the moment, so I was just curious why you were having a reaction there.In post 374, Bingle wrote:Do you think that isn’t accurate? Why?
Sounds like you're going on a vibe rather than specifics
What do you need clarified? I’ve said a little bit on a lot of topics so far.
Voting my townread therefory voting town therefory mafiaIn post 386, Datisi wrote:what about that post is scummy?In post 362, Enchant wrote:First post.VP Baltar wrote:Why?In post 350, Enchant wrote:Imo if i had gun i would shot Sleepless Assassin.
I think one person did tbhIn post 368, Datisi wrote:people scumread me?In post 366, Gamma Emerald wrote:why do people SR dats, this feels like real thought process
lol this is towmIn post 371, Enchant wrote:I just realised there's no Pooky in game.
Bingle fooled me to vote invisible person.
Not so much scummy as weird. I don’t ave a strong read on you either way, but I do have a “this is weird” read and I’m trying to work out why. S’kinda why I want to find the time to have a back and forth.In post 384, Fun and Games wrote:Yes, i agree that you can read my play that way. Why is this scummy tho?
may I haggle for you to say why?
Oh i didn't realize you wanted a back and forth eith me, thought u wanted one with other people about meIn post 393, Bingle wrote:Not so much scummy as weird. I don’t ave a strong read on you either way, but I do have a “this is weird” read and I’m trying to work out why. S’kinda why I want to find the time to have a back and forth.In post 384, Fun and Games wrote:Yes, i agree that you can read my play that way. Why is this scummy tho?
I like style of posting, feels familiar.In post 394, Datisi wrote:enchant, can you actually answer the questions people have for you and play the game you signed up to play
as far as i know, your only game with iconeum was that where he was scum, so what does this mean?In post 397, Enchant wrote:I like style of posting, feels familiar.
I didn't mean exactly that, i just feel mafia doesh't play like that because i play like that sometimes.In post 398, Datisi wrote:as far as i know, your only game with iconeum was that where he was scum, so what does this mean?In post 397, Enchant wrote:I like style of posting, feels familiar.