Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 1:26 pm
Ydra won't let me sit at the lunch table
bazzinga
Mena and I are different players.In post 362, JunkoChan wrote:In post 355, Vanderscamp wrote:I'd probably try harder to get in a coalition.In post 342, Una wrote:Vanderscamp, do you think you would have played differently so far as mafia?this is a contradiction you know?In post 356, Vanderscamp wrote:This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?
Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.
you are answering your own doubt, you are saying you would try hard to get in a coalition as maf but critic my pov that trying less is town indicative.
HURT: Vanderscamp
Junko!In post 372, Dannflor wrote:I think swapping in vanderscamp for someone is a good idea I just don’t know who yet
I mean, I love playing scum, town is like meh, unless the lobby is fun and dandyIn post 380, Vanderscamp wrote:Mena and I are different players.In post 362, JunkoChan wrote:In post 355, Vanderscamp wrote:I'd probably try harder to get in a coalition.In post 342, Una wrote:Vanderscamp, do you think you would have played differently so far as mafia?this is a contradiction you know?In post 356, Vanderscamp wrote:This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?
Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.
you are answering your own doubt, you are saying you would try hard to get in a coalition as maf but critic my pov that trying less is town indicative.
HURT: Vanderscamp
I enjoy being scum, and Mena's performance as scum in the game I played with them was not enthusiastic to say the least.
Does Mena love playing scum?In post 382, JunkoChan wrote:I mean, I love playing scum, town is like meh, unless the lobby is fun and dandyIn post 380, Vanderscamp wrote:Mena and I are different players.In post 362, JunkoChan wrote:In post 355, Vanderscamp wrote:I'd probably try harder to get in a coalition.In post 342, Una wrote:Vanderscamp, do you think you would have played differently so far as mafia?this is a contradiction you know?In post 356, Vanderscamp wrote:This feels very strange, why would lack of thread presence be town indicative?In post 351, JunkoChan wrote:Jk jk I mean, this phase is like lottery, You put your numbers in it and pray, not wanting to engage in perma wifom is town indicative for me
Like even if "not engaging in wifom" is a valid reason to townread someone, which it probably isn't, surely most scum don't want to do it either just based on general scum slankiness tendencies?
Unless your read on Mena is that they try harder as scum, which from the scum game I've seen from them is absolutely not the case.
you are answering your own doubt, you are saying you would try hard to get in a coalition as maf but critic my pov that trying less is town indicative.
HURT: Vanderscamp
I enjoy being scum, and Mena's performance as scum in the game I played with them was not enthusiastic to say the least.
Swap Ydrasse and maybe Menalque for Junko and maybe you, and I can compromise there.In post 388, Dannflor wrote:HEAL: Menalque, Una, unwnd, Vanderscamp, ydrasse
ok can we do this
we can swap me for menalque if you want
Mostly that I don't see scum making up such a read. It feels like a read that they know basically everyone would disagree with, at least with its reasoning.In post 359, Vanderscamp wrote:Can you elaborate on why you think this?In post 352, Lucian wrote:Well I cannot disagree more, both with that read and with that mindset, but it fits with the idea of town-you I have in mind, so like, okay.
The second part, I agree the read/mindset is weird