Page 151 of 177

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:45 am
by drmyshottyizsik
What are you just trying to confuse us and buy time because you know the outcome?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:47 am
by Nosferatu
In post 3686, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 3618, Nosferatu wrote:but why would he crumb it as scum in the first place? Much more likely that he's town that doesn't want the scum team to kill him.
Do you really think that makes any sense given all the gymnastics he’s done today? He couldn’t have painted a more noticeable target on his back if he tried if he is Town.
Ok, what do you think is the regular town response for what happened to Shaz? In a situation assuming that townie Tim is in fact an odd night roleblocker. Tim crumbed that you had knowledge that Titus was town for god knows what reason, and she immediately decided to hound him like a dog for it. How does Tim respond?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:51 am
by Ircher
In post 3751, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 3686, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 3618, Nosferatu wrote:but why would he crumb it as scum in the first place? Much more likely that he's town that doesn't want the scum team to kill him.
Do you really think that makes any sense given all the gymnastics he’s done today? He couldn’t have painted a more noticeable target on his back if he tried if he is Town.
Ok, what do you think is the regular town response for what happened to Shaz? In a situation assuming that townie Tim is in fact an odd night roleblocker. Tim crumbed that you had knowledge that Titus was town for god knows what reason, and she immediately decided to hound him like a dog for it. How does Tim respond?
What???

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 4:52 am
by Titus
In post 3751, Nosferatu wrote:
In post 3686, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 3618, Nosferatu wrote:but why would he crumb it as scum in the first place? Much more likely that he's town that doesn't want the scum team to kill him.
Do you really think that makes any sense given all the gymnastics he’s done today? He couldn’t have painted a more noticeable target on his back if he tried if he is Town.
Ok, what do you think is the regular town response for what happened to Shaz? In a situation assuming that townie Tim is in fact an odd night roleblocker. Tim crumbed that you had knowledge that Titus was town for god knows what reason, and she immediately decided to hound him like a dog for it. How does Tim respond?
By denying he role blocked me D3 isn't it.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 5:55 am
by Nosferatu
I doubt scum would even try to clear you as town, subtly or no, in the first place.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:10 am
by Egg
Forgot to announce:
V/LA until Friday

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:15 am
by zakk
went looking more

to find what i found, do the following:

copy this into chrome bar
(may work on other browsers too, idk. it's just viewing the source of shotty's iso)

Code: Select all

view-source:http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=7935649&user_select%5B%5D=13944#p7935649


search for this

Code: Select all

<span style="font-style: italic">


there's 13 matches, four of which are in post #399

1. "
E
speciallyTheLies"
2. "I
n
post 366"
3/4. the periods on either side of the eyeroll emoji:

Code: Select all

agreed  [i].[/i] :roll: [i].[/i]


Spoiler:
In post 399, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 393, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
In post 323, cytheflyguy wrote:I got to page 11 and I got busy lol. I'll try to finish everything in a bit
I[i]n[/i] [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7933850#p7933850]post 366[/url], cytheflyguy wrote:I have read nothing and everything at the same time. Ircher seems most scum atm so I'll go with him for now

VOTE: Ircher
:?

I dunno what this is. I think votes on him are lazier than these posts though.
agreed
.
:roll:
.


i didn't find anything very out of the ordinary with regards to other posts

if this is crumbing, this is a shitty job

and also it looks like it's made to be pretty a. unnoticeable if he didn't use it, and b. unclear/options open, if he did

but it's there, in any case, however ambiguous.





remarks, shotty?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:20 am
by drmyshottyizsik
uh yes, what else is en with blocks around :rolll:? Also if I "wasn't going to use it", why would I use it unprovoked.... Zakk trying to twist the looks bad. You are angry scum, angry you didn't see it. It's not a shitty crumb it is a very well hidden one that is easily explain. If anything it is a master crumb. Your argument that it isn't obvious enough to be a real crumb is insane. The entire point of a crumb is to make it as discrete as possible. I spent like 25 minutes on that crumb.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:52 am
by MagnaofIllusion
In post 3739, Titus wrote:@Magna, I never would have claimed if not wagoned, who was scum voting for me?
Why don’t you tell me who you think? Frankly this information sharing we’ve been doing lately seems to be a one-way street and that is starting to bug me.
In post 3751, Nosferatu wrote:Ok, what do you think is the regular town response for what happened to Shaz? In a situation assuming that townie Tim is in fact an odd night roleblocker. Tim crumbed that you had knowledge that Titus was town for god knows what reason, and she immediately decided to hound him like a dog for it. How does Tim respond?
Firstly – she didn’t “immediately decide to hound him”. His “reasons” post happened eartly Day 2 and yet it was only into Day 3 that Titus pressed him for results.

Secondly – I think a Town response would be, when called on it, to explain. There was no point as Town in your scenario for Shaz to say he didn’t think she was a Vig and then push her as scum Day 3.

There is not a Normal approved Role on MS that justifies the level of “I’ll explain later” we are getting from him.
In post 3754, Nosferatu wrote:I doubt scum would even try to clear you as town, subtly or no, in the first place.
So buddying isn’t a thing?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 8:59 am
by Lowell
I believe shotty's claim and believe he's probably town for it.

None of this has to do with lynching nos, egg, or magna tho, so....

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 9:35 am
by Nosferatu
In post 3758, MagnaofIllusion wrote:
In post 3751, Nosferatu wrote:Ok, what do you think is the regular town response for what happened to Shaz? In a situation assuming that townie Tim is in fact an odd night roleblocker. Tim crumbed that you had knowledge that Titus was town for god knows what reason, and she immediately decided to hound him like a dog for it. How does Tim respond?
Firstly – she didn’t “immediately decide to hound him”. His “reasons” post happened eartly Day 2 and yet it was only into Day 3 that Titus pressed him for results.

Secondly – I think a Town response would be, when called on it, to explain. There was no point as Town in your scenario for Shaz to say he didn’t think she was a Vig and then push her as scum Day 3.

There is not a Normal approved Role on MS that justifies the level of “I’ll explain later” we are getting from him.
In post 3754, Nosferatu wrote:I doubt scum would even try to clear you as town, subtly or no, in the first place.
So buddying isn’t a thing?
1. Remembered that differently. I stand corrected I guess.
2. I disagree but I see your point.
3.You think Shaz is buddying Titus?

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 9:37 am
by Titus
In post 3759, Lowell wrote:I believe shotty's claim and believe he's probably town for it.

None of this has to do with lynching nos, egg, or magna tho, so....
I'm starting to come around on Magna lynch. He's all fine on spec but when I push him for analysis, he shuts down.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 9:54 am
by drmyshottyizsik
I like magna over liger

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:20 pm
by zakk
In post 3757, drmyshottyizsik wrote:uh yes, what else is en with blocks around :rolll:? Also if I "wasn't going to use it", why would I use it unprovoked.... Zakk trying to twist the looks bad. You are angry scum, angry you didn't see it. It's not a shitty crumb it is a very well hidden one that is easily explain. If anything it is a master crumb. Your argument that it isn't obvious enough to be a real crumb is insane. The entire point of a crumb is to make it as discrete as possible. I spent like 25 minutes on that crumb.
ohhhhh ... yeah i get it now

that's some professor layton puzzle shit right there

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:23 pm
by zakk
and that's not an argument that it's a shitty crumb in terms of it being hard to spot and therefore you are likely scum

it's a comment that hey i found it he was telling the truth but this shit is nigh undecipherable even when told what you're looking for

like i said i want nos lynched, not you

and i completely ignored this post for a reason.
In post 3684, Titus wrote:Let's get rid of shotty Zakk.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:30 pm
by zakk
In post 3735, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 399, drmyshottyizsik wrote:
In post 393, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:
In post 323, cytheflyguy wrote:I got to page 11 and I got busy lol. I'll try to finish everything in a bit
I[i]n[/i] [url=http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?p=7933850#p7933850]post 366[/url], cytheflyguy wrote:I have read nothing and everything at the same time. Ircher seems most scum atm so I'll go with him for now

VOTE: Ircher
:?

I dunno what this is. I think votes on him are lazier than these posts though.
agreed
.
:roll:
.
there is the e and the n. the role block part is the italic periods or blocks around the eye rolling, or roll, emoji. I got creative
oh haaaaa

i missed this post

i must have missed that whole page tbh because i don't remember any of the posts on it





oh well, phone fail

i'm on a computer now tho so ayyyy

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:32 pm
by zakk
oh there's votes on me too now

ahahahahahahahahha

lol


hella fail

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:33 pm
by zakk
i'm more interested in lynching nos and nahdia than anyone else right now

magna and liger kind of too but, i'd rather save them for later due to the PT

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:34 pm
by zakk
i am still laughing pretty hard at how stupid 3756 must look after shotty had already posted 3735 the page before

:facepalm: :oops:

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:38 pm
by SirCakez
Votecount 3.8

Mount Kosciuszko in Australia!
Image

Nosferatu (5) - projectmatt, Liger_zero, Lowell, zakk, cytheflyguy
Ircher (2) - Egg, Shaziro
drmyshottyizsik (2) - Nahdia, Nosferatu
zakk (2) - Ircher, drmyshottyizsik
Egg (1) - MagnaOfIllusion

Not voting (1) - Titus

With 13 alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch someone.

Egg is V/LA until July 1.

(expired on 2016-07-02 18:44:00) remain until day end.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 12:39 pm
by zakk
nos and nahdia both being on shotty is shitty

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:29 pm
by Shaziro
Folks, seriously. Ircher is scum, he literally gave me the answer when trying to make an argument, I quoted the argument and everything. If he doesn't get lynched today, I'm gonna be a sad panda.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:32 pm
by Ircher
You weren't very convincing. And you're wrong.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:41 pm
by Shaziro
No, I'm not. I can accept that I'm not particularly convincing, because I can't give my reasons just yet.

Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 2:45 pm
by Titus
In post 3771, Shaziro wrote:Folks, seriously. Ircher is scum, he literally gave me the answer when trying to make an argument, I quoted the argument and everything. If he doesn't get lynched today, I'm gonna be a sad panda.
In post 3773, Shaziro wrote:No, I'm not. I can accept that I'm not particularly convincing, because I can't give my reasons just yet.
Assuming Ircher is scum, then why not tell town? Scum ALREADY KNOW.