Page 151 of 201
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:16 am
by Varsoon
THERE ARE NO SKELETONS INSIDE MY CLOSET!!!
EXCEPT ME SOMETIMES.
Gamma Emerald (2):
Maid Cafe, Venmar
Venmar (1):
Skybird
Not Voting (13):
Iconeum, Chara, baku and munna, Creature, Bronya Zaychik, Almost50, Reasonably Rational, Gamma Emerald, Nancy Drew 39, Venmar, Dunnstral, Heart, Purple
With 14 Alive, it takes 8 to Lynch.
Deadline
:
(expired on 2018-04-08 19:20:00)
The current playthrough is on the PACIFIST ROUTE.
Snarky Snowman is on V/LA until Thursday, 3/29/2018.
Snarky Snowman no longer counts as a living player.
They may still post, but they may not vote, be voted for, act, or be targeted.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:18 am
by Gamma Emerald
mfw Titus' image works and yours doesn't
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:18 am
by Chara
i'd love if you would pay special attention to Almost50, baku and munna, Gamma, and Skybird.
and also to keep an eye on your PMs. ;>
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:20 am
by baku and munna
did anyone see if snarky was online just now?
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:22 am
by baku and munna
ok doesnt look like they were so it's either some obscure requirement doing it or someone else did it
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:33 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3711, Kiana Kaslana wrote: In post 3710, Reasonably Rational wrote:Okay, so same as mine. So, let's look at the spread of events:
12:16 B&M submitted all their PT creation actions
12:30 PT with RR is created
12:33 last post of the day, made by Gamma
12:50 PT with MC is created
12:57 the Sword is cast
So, this *wasn't* a matter of Varsoon showing up and actions having been submitted, unless scum told him to cast the sword at ~1, or they happened to show up and submit that action in the 14 minutes between B&M's action submission, and the creation of the PT.
This is why the time the thread was locked is really important. If someone can figure that out, it would be helpful.
-Cerb
Why not? Varsoon could just have taken his time with performing moderator actions. He could have been busy.
Speaking as a mod this is plausible, I got really lazy with my last game and am ashamed of myself for doing so, part of it was not wanting to take the time to write flavor
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:35 am
by Reasonably Rational
In post 3755, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 3711, Kiana Kaslana wrote: In post 3710, Reasonably Rational wrote:Okay, so same as mine. So, let's look at the spread of events:
12:16 B&M submitted all their PT creation actions
12:30 PT with RR is created
12:33 last post of the day, made by Gamma
12:50 PT with MC is created
12:57 the Sword is cast
So, this *wasn't* a matter of Varsoon showing up and actions having been submitted, unless scum told him to cast the sword at ~1, or they happened to show up and submit that action in the 14 minutes between B&M's action submission, and the creation of the PT.
This is why the time the thread was locked is really important. If someone can figure that out, it would be helpful.
-Cerb
Why not? Varsoon could just have taken his time with performing moderator actions. He could have been busy.
Speaking as a mod this is plausible, I got really lazy with my last game and am ashamed of myself for doing so, part of it was not wanting to take the time to write flavor
I shall give you the advice I've given other mods in flavor heavy games: Make sure the mechanic shit is immediately known, don't put the pressure on yourself to write the flavor, and fill it in later.
-Cerb
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:38 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3716, Reasonably Rational wrote: In post 3597, Maid Cafe wrote:I got my B&M hood at 12:50. so yeah lol.
The only motivation A50 has to claim is to cover for B&M even as town he shouldn't have claimed that.
Mark dying over {RR, MC, Purple, Chara, Bronya} is odd af and points to the guilty theory and not a coincedence.
Gamma is obvious scum and his flip points to Venmar.
B&M and A50 are just tied scum atm.
If I am wrong anywhere it's Nancy who is left.
Cerb thoughts on the team I've been at for awhile?
MC?
Why the difference between the time the hood was created for you, and for them?
-Cerb
So we have both this and MC's so called guilty on me even though they took no action? Looks pretty shady to me.
VOTE: Maid Cafe
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:40 am
by Gamma Emerald
Okay the times were explained but I'm not moving my vote until MC can give a legitimate explanation of why they said there was a guilty on me after they no-acted.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:44 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3745, baku and munna wrote:i think everyone should be given one post to a) case someone based on posting b) put forwards a mechanical argument. we do this in small batches so we can properly analyse them. thoughts on this technique?
Why?
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 8:44 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3756, Reasonably Rational wrote: In post 3755, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 3711, Kiana Kaslana wrote: In post 3710, Reasonably Rational wrote:Okay, so same as mine. So, let's look at the spread of events:
12:16 B&M submitted all their PT creation actions
12:30 PT with RR is created
12:33 last post of the day, made by Gamma
12:50 PT with MC is created
12:57 the Sword is cast
So, this *wasn't* a matter of Varsoon showing up and actions having been submitted, unless scum told him to cast the sword at ~1, or they happened to show up and submit that action in the 14 minutes between B&M's action submission, and the creation of the PT.
This is why the time the thread was locked is really important. If someone can figure that out, it would be helpful.
-Cerb
Why not? Varsoon could just have taken his time with performing moderator actions. He could have been busy.
Speaking as a mod this is plausible, I got really lazy with my last game and am ashamed of myself for doing so, part of it was not wanting to take the time to write flavor
I shall give you the advice I've given other mods in flavor heavy games: Make sure the mechanic shit is immediately known, don't put the pressure on yourself to write the flavor, and fill it in later.
-Cerb
Thanks pal
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:04 am
by Maid Cafe
Er I really just want to fully case the game in one go but I keep getting lazy.
~B
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:06 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3752, Chara wrote:
i'd love if you would pay special attention to Almost50, baku and munna, Gamma, and Skybird.
and also to keep an eye on your PMs. ;>
Okay, I’m assuming you’re sr them, or some of them?
I would have much preferred to sub in right at the beginning of D2 but I was unfortunately unable to contribute anything of value until yesterday.
I will do an ISO of your posts on them, and their’s as well.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:07 am
by Maid Cafe
In post 3758, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay the times were explained but I'm not moving my vote until MC can give a legitimate explanation of why they said there was a guilty on me after they no-acted.
I find it kinda surprising that it took you this long to point this out.
Also when I claimed to have 2 guilties and you accepted it I find it kinda weird you didn't really take the info you had to refute it.
Like it's more of a defensive thought process and you just took what I said at face value rather then critically think about it.
I retracted my guilty on you awhile back but I think generally this thought process doesn't come from town.
~B
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:08 am
by Maid Cafe
@Nancy, ISO these slots: Venmar, A50, Baku and Gamma Emerald (also his hydra: Tibor and Lumia)
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:13 am
by Maid Cafe
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:18 am
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3597, Maid Cafe wrote:I got my B&M hood at 12:50. so yeah lol.
The only motivation A50 has to claim is to cover for B&M even as town he shouldn't have claimed that.
Mark dying over {RR, MC, Purple, Chara, Bronya} is odd af and points to the guilty theory and not a coincedence.
Gamma is obvious scum and his flip points to Venmar.
B&M and A50 are just tied scum atm.
If I am wrong anywhere it's Nancy who is left.
Cerb thoughts on the team I've been at for awhile?
I’m not caught up enough yet to effectively weigh in on this, but eventhough I have have been a low poster thus far; I am def. not scummy.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:22 am
by Nancy Drew 39
Not town’s game, unless for some reason you’re a fan of mislynches?
I’m obv. referring to #3.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 10:31 am
by Gamma Emerald
In post 3763, Maid Cafe wrote: In post 3758, Gamma Emerald wrote:Okay the times were explained but I'm not moving my vote until MC can give a legitimate explanation of why they said there was a guilty on me after they no-acted.
I find it kinda surprising that it took you this long to point this out.
Also when I claimed to have 2 guilties and you accepted it I find it kinda weird you didn't really take the info you had to refute it.
Like it's more of a defensive thought process and you just took what I said at face value rather then critically think about it.
I retracted my guilty on you awhile back but I think generally this thought process doesn't come from town.
~B
I don't care if you retracted, my question still remains of how you got it.
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 12:23 pm
by Nancy Drew 39
In post 3764, Maid Cafe wrote:@Nancy, ISO these slots: Venmar, A50, Baku and Gamma Emerald (also his hydra: Tibor and Lumia)
Okay, so I will ask you the same question I asked Chara?
Are you reading all these as scum slots?
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 12:25 pm
by Nancy Drew 39
I just ISOed Chara; I will do the others later
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 12:28 pm
by Reasonably Rational
In post 3769, Nancy Drew 39 wrote: In post 3764, Maid Cafe wrote:@Nancy, ISO these slots: Venmar, A50, Baku and Gamma Emerald (also his hydra: Tibor and Lumia)
Okay, so I will ask you the same question I asked Chara?
Are you reading all these as scum slots?
I think he wants an objective, new perspective on that set of slots. That means answering your question is unacceptable, because it may bias you one way or another.
I will confirm that those slots have been major points of discussion on this day phase, and his recommendation that you preferentially ISO those slots will help you in having commentary to make which is relevant to the conversations happening today.
If you intend to actually catch up quickly(which I find a bit unlikely, given that you had the entire night phase to read and apparently chose not to/were unable to do so), you should probably just do that instead though.
-Cerb
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 12:30 pm
by Reasonably Rational
In post 3708, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:After beginning to get more caught up in the game; I’m thinking that Chara is prob. town. He seems to be solvey, without any particular agenda.
Why did you preferentially ISO an individual who you decided was probably town? That seems like a waste of limited time.
-Cerb
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 12:34 pm
by Venmar
In post 3698, Reasonably Rational wrote:And I suppose I just don't expect much from Venmar with regards to mechanics, perhaps because of the tone of his posts, I just don't expect him to be super mechanically oriented, and therefore likely to make mistakes(as he just did), so I would have wanted to be extra sure before risking wasting the ability. *Shrug*
u suck too
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2018 12:47 pm
by Purple Heart
In post 3757, Gamma Emerald wrote: In post 3716, Reasonably Rational wrote: In post 3597, Maid Cafe wrote:I got my B&M hood at 12:50. so yeah lol.
The only motivation A50 has to claim is to cover for B&M even as town he shouldn't have claimed that.
Mark dying over {RR, MC, Purple, Chara, Bronya} is odd af and points to the guilty theory and not a coincedence.
Gamma is obvious scum and his flip points to Venmar.
B&M and A50 are just tied scum atm.
If I am wrong anywhere it's Nancy who is left.
Cerb thoughts on the team I've been at for awhile?
MC?
Why the difference between the time the hood was created for you, and for them?
-Cerb
So we have both this and MC's so called guilty on me even though they took no action? Looks pretty shady to me.
VOTE: Maid Cafe
oh look the outed wolf votes the towniest person in the game
Big shocker.