Page 151 of 260

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:39 pm
by Vorkuta
In post 3747, skitter30 wrote:
In post 3744, pisskop wrote:Id policy lynch nom just to set a precedent against such play
No
+1

And I'm disagreeing with a vote for nom x3 so you know that this reasoning is horrible

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:39 pm
by pisskop
In post 3749, skitter30 wrote:Massclaim should prob be tomorrow?

The vig is clearing tho
better?

I think an L-1 -1 MC isnt terrible considering a miller claim is on the table.

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:40 pm
by nomnomnom
In post 3744, pisskop wrote:Id policy lynch nom just to set a precedent against such play
Sometimes I just wish I could connect other people's brains to my brains because I have the impression that while what I type makes a lot of sense, it seems to chinese to people.

And unfortunately that's not a thing that only happens here. It's frustrating.

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:40 pm
by nomnomnom
In post 3750, Vorkuta wrote:
In post 3747, skitter30 wrote:
In post 3744, pisskop wrote:Id policy lynch nom just to set a precedent against such play
No
+1

And I'm disagreeing with a vote for nom x3 so you know that this reasoning is horrible
Then why are you voting me????

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:41 pm
by Vorkuta
In post 3748, pisskop wrote:Remember the last time you suggested mass claiming for no fucking reason?
Which one was this in?

Ramblings? Not my finest moment
Jazz? :igmeou:
BTXI? Very very very well warranted and should've happened sooner

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:41 pm
by pisskop
Im not 100 serious, but I am frustrated yes

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:42 pm
by skitter30
In post 3752, nomnomnom wrote:
In post 3744, pisskop wrote:Id policy lynch nom just to set a precedent against such play
Sometimes I just wish I could connect other people's brains to my brains because I have the impression that while what I type makes a lot of sense, it seems to chinese to people.

And unfortunately that's not a thing that only happens here. It's frustrating.
Maybe consider that this might be a thing that's happening in this game given that a significant part of why you're scumreading me is basically this

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:46 pm
by nomnomnom
In post 3756, skitter30 wrote:
In post 3752, nomnomnom wrote:
In post 3744, pisskop wrote:Id policy lynch nom just to set a precedent against such play
Sometimes I just wish I could connect other people's brains to my brains because I have the impression that while what I type makes a lot of sense, it seems to chinese to people.

And unfortunately that's not a thing that only happens here. It's frustrating.
Maybe consider that this might be a thing that's happening in this game given that a significant part of why you're scumreading me is basically this
No, that's not why.

I am scumreading you because I believe there's scum intent in these pushes. Same for DP and pk, that's why. You even agreed that the movements could seem bad from an outside perspective, so why don't you understand my triplet reasoning and why on earth do you townread these other two while they did the same thing as you??

I'm at loss of words. I don't know. A part of me wishes you perhaps haven't had the "Eureka!" moment but another part of me tells me that you're just scum.

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:49 pm
by Vorkuta
In post 3749, skitter30 wrote:The vig is clearing tho
Mm... I want to take a slight gamble and say that the vig is now useless (shots wise) (ie- 1-shot or even-night or smth)

But a holstered shot or Novice/N2+ would be ugly.
In post 3753, nomnomnom wrote:Then why are you voting me????
Because your interactions and the way you've played this game so far seems to come from a scum!nomx3 as opposed to a town!nom and I personally think that my scum!nom case is stronger and "more Okham's razor-y" than my other scum cases.

HOWEVER
Pisskop commented on policying you, and I had to voice my objection to that BS.
Huh
pisskop + nom scum theater right there?

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:49 pm
by skitter30
I, in part, townread them for doing the same thing that i did - it tels me that it's more likely that they're approaching thr game the same way that i am - p similar to why you're townreading nero

Also urap doesnt make sense as a urap partner really

Pisskop's miller thing is bad but on balance i dont think comes from scum who's capable of recognizing that doing so will makr them scumread

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:50 pm
by skitter30
@vork idk if the vig is gated or not but vig's have to be town and i dont see anothet explanation for two deaths last night so whoever took the shot is basically conftown

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:52 pm
by nomnomnom
In post 3759, skitter30 wrote:I, in part, townread them for doing the same thing that i did - it tels me that it's more likely that they're approaching thr game the same way that i am - p similar to why you're townreading nero

Also urap doesnt make sense as a urap partner really

Pisskop's miller thing is bad but on balance i dont think comes from scum who's capable of recognizing that doing so will makr them scumread
Okay, but we discussed about your movements and you said that the arguments were fair so I suppose you recognize the possibility of these movements you've been making are bad.

PK and DP have taken similar movements.

So, again, while I understand the angle you're approaching with townmelding, I think it's a faulty argument here.

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:53 pm
by Vorkuta
In post 3760, skitter30 wrote:but vig's have to be town
you don't say :P

But yes- we might get ~2 conf!towns with a massclaim today, and maybe shed some light on a miller claim.
Considering what the gamestate is currently devolving into, I think it's more optimal to MC now as opposed to tomorrow

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:55 pm
by Dunnstral
I don't agree with a massclaim today

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 12:55 pm
by nomnomnom
Massclaiming is a bad idea.

Dunn help me out here, I feel a bit lonely.

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:04 pm
by Vorkuta
Here's where I'm at right now

6-2 (today)
1 vig + 1 miller + 1 cop, +said cop's clear (inb4 cleared a dead person or smth) = like 4 conf!towns (I will tentatively buy pisskop's miller claim if there's an acceptable invest. role that it brings negative utility to)
Sorting in 4 people (4 unconf!town and 2 scum) is better than the current clusterfuck that we have today, ESPECIALLY if the right people claim the PRs.

Otherwise I think we're effectively stonewalled because there would have to be a ridiculous 180 for people's lynchpools to overlap

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:05 pm
by nomnomnom
I'm just at a loss of words at this gamestate honestly.

It feels a bit unreal to be like this on day 3.

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:12 pm
by skitter30
... was there a cop claim that i missed?

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:13 pm
by Vorkuta
In post 3765, Vorkuta wrote:(I will tentatively buy pisskop's miller claim if there's an acceptable invest. role that it brings negative utility to)

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:14 pm
by Vorkuta
If we're MC'ing and there's
-no cop: bye bye pisskop
-a cop: hello pisskop, + the inno's that the cop provided

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:15 pm
by nomnomnom
In post 3767, skitter30 wrote:... was there a cop claim that i missed?
ptsd intensifies

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:16 pm
by nomnomnom
also just drop the MC idea we're not doing it.

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:16 pm
by Vorkuta
I'm wasting space and generating content
I know we won't :P

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:17 pm
by Vorkuta
In post 3434, Dunnstral wrote:
In post 3433, skitter30 wrote:Do nero's reada suck this bad usually if he's town?
Yes

Since Teacher died DP is next followed by Pisskop and Vorkuta - follow the order
*inhales*

Posted: Wed Jul 03, 2019 1:17 pm
by Dunnstral
In post 3759, skitter30 wrote:Also urap doesnt make sense as a urap partner really
Yeah probably not
nomnomnom wrote:Massclaiming is a bad idea.

Dunn help me out here, I feel a bit lonely.
What do you need help with

I'm trying to figure out where I want to vote today
Vorkuta wrote:I think
If this game was decided based on what you think, town would have lost by now