Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 8:51 am
If you want somebody else more badly then say so, lass.
I had my vote where my heart wanted it.
Pretty much the only legitimate reason I’ve seen you put out about me is the fact my catch ups are mastina-style. I have pointed out the fact that they actually differ in a way that should actually quite significantly allay your concerns about me, and stated that I’m like this as both alignments in multiple contexts, but you still have held onto this point like a treasured childhood doll. Is there really nothing else to the read? Why haven’t you acknowledged my response to this point seemingly ever? If this read on me really is all that it seems to be, I definitely look forward to rolling scum against you.In post 2246, fferyllt wrote:I'm a little less sanguine about Gamma, but would be willing to discuss. Still not entirely comfortable about that mastina-style catchup while all sorts of shit was going on in real time.
Why are you uncomfortable about me vs. the other 2? It seems you’re holding me to an unfairly high standard of play rn.In post 3187, fferyllt wrote:And that's why I want to townread peta. I can understand how he's processing the game.Cabd wrote:See, what I'm getting is that only Peta actually is processing the role claims in a logical manner. But they can't ALL be scum.In post 3180, fferyllt wrote:I want more townreads I feel good about.
I feel like I keep asking the same questions every few hours, revolving around peta and cakez. The answers usually make me feel like my townreading them is a little naive.
pedit see?
I also understand how Nahdia is processing it Day 2. Even if it's not all completely dialed in to my view of the game, it's consistent enough that eh. ok.
Gamma's kind of the same way, but I'm not as comfortable with his play.
You should re-iso me if you think that's the only reason I've put out about you.In post 3756, Gamma Emerald wrote:Pretty much the only legitimate reason I’ve seen you put out about me is the fact my catch ups are mastina-style. I have pointed out the fact that they actually differ in a way that should actually quite significantly allay your concerns about me, and stated that I’m like this as both alignments in multiple contexts, but you still have held onto this point like a treasured childhood doll. Is there really nothing else to the read? Why haven’t you acknowledged my response to this point seemingly ever? If this read on me really is all that it seems to be, I definitely look forward to rolling scum against you.In post 2246, fferyllt wrote:I'm a little less sanguine about Gamma, but would be willing to discuss. Still not entirely comfortable about that mastina-style catchup while all sorts of shit was going on in real time.
I don't think there's enough time and I don't think there are enough people scumreading Gamma to make it worth the effort.In post 3760, Cabd wrote:If you want to swing back there, you have my support, and my idiot kid brother-lurker's support.
I agree that this should probably happen.In post 3764, petapan wrote:if this is town then kill me and solve off how the other people approached the wagon. it's fine.
now you're actually being scummyIn post 3768, midwaybear wrote:I agree that this should probably happen.In post 3764, petapan wrote:if this is town then kill me and solve off how the other people approached the wagon. it's fine.