Posted: Sun Nov 14, 2021 3:41 pm
For Ircher:
Spoiler:
Ircher why is Victorine town?
~C
You shouldn't be interpreting as a probability. Others may be using it as a way to indicate a probability, but I am quite clearly not doing that.In post 3749, jjh927 wrote:That's exactly how it worksIn post 3744, Ircher wrote:That's not how it works. A scale where 50% is really 3/4s of the way is useless.
It is a lower bar to consider someone town than scum
If you say you're 80% sure someone is town, it means you think that 4 times out of 5 they will flip town
well, yeahIn post 3742, Loftwing wrote:By probably, do you mean that there are other factors as well? If not, what do you mean by probably?In post 3737, Gamma Emerald wrote:Probably
We're not doing that.In post 3746, Ircher wrote:We can kill Galron as well.
On reflection this may indeed be one of those weirdpushes that is not a scum-motivated weirdpush.In post 3675, Sakura Hana wrote:I dont get this stance?In post 3562, Deimos27 wrote:Guys wanna wagon jjh after allIn post 3531, jjh927 wrote:-Why did Yume suddenly start signing every post with M having done that on exactly one other post, along with also having signed as "Big bad wold" and "Red" previously, at a time when GrandpaMo decided to push the agenda that Yume's post restriction was to imitate Mastina?
-Why does GMo ignore Post 2161 while attempting to determine Yume's post restriction?
-This is exactly the kind of poorly thought out nonsense I would expect from scum!Yume to justify demonstrably false claims based on what has happened when Yume has been caught in a lie in the past
-GMo really pushed that agenda HARD there. Like damn, there were some serious leaps of logic to get to that conclusion and then he left it open with the obvious "Mastina" answer for me and/or Fire to answer for him so he doesn't seem completely batshit insane.
Conclusion- A pair of bad actors reading a bad script
I'm not sure what you're doing if not to discredit Ircher's defense of Vic.In post 3759, jjh927 wrote:You should maybe stop using quantitative measures to describe your confidence if it is qualitative
I lent out my BoM. Can you explain ghost associates and ghost tells?In post 3760, Deimos27 wrote:ghost associatives compared to ghost individual tells
You should see how polarized Nancy and my reads are on Firebear.In post 3763, Deimos27 wrote:Fascinated at how polarised the reads of Fire/Pooky (sorry didn't pay attention to who it was) and Cheeky are wrt jjh
cheeky being wrong is a not a new thingIn post 3763, Deimos27 wrote:Fascinated at how polarised the reads of Fire/Pooky (sorry didn't pay attention to who it was) and Cheeky are wrt jjh
what is this book of mafia in actualityIn post 3764, Galron wrote:I lent out my BoM. Can you explain ghost associates and ghost tells?In post 3760, Deimos27 wrote:ghost associatives compared to ghost individual tells
I'm doing two things in equal parts;In post 3762, Cheeky Wings wrote:I'm not sure what you're doing if not to discredit Ircher's defense of Vic.In post 3759, jjh927 wrote:You should maybe stop using quantitative measures to describe your confidence if it is qualitative
~C
Can I get an example of this unrequested information? It boggles me that out or all the wagons so far you feel so confident (confident enough to be eliminated instead of them) on Vic who happens to be the hardest to parse imo.In post 3753, Ircher wrote:If scum!Victorine wanted to coast in this game, she would have just kept up her minimal engagement with the game. That's not at all what happened. Over the course of today, she has offered significant amounts of information unrequested from her.
I love how you always hold my town game in such high regard.In post 3766, Good Luck Buddy wrote:cheeky being wrong is a not a new thingIn post 3763, Deimos27 wrote:Fascinated at how polarised the reads of Fire/Pooky (sorry didn't pay attention to who it was) and Cheeky are wrt jjh