Mafiascum.net

How do you know that scum know, Titus?

Tbqh, I have absolutely no clue what "scumtell" Shaz caught with his ~reasons~.

nahdia is town.

sorry i was too lazy to unvote zakk.

VOTE: Nosferatu

In post 3775, Shaziro wrote:How do you know that scum know, Titus?

If we presume Ircher is scum.
If we presume Ircher said your answer.
Then he knows your reasons.
Therefore scum know your reasons.

No, he accidentally gave me the missing piece to the puzzle in what he said. Apologies for not being clear.

No final reads, as I honestly doubt you guys would follow them in the first place. No claim either, because it really doesn't matter. Probably going to be my last post. Leave a message at the beep.

VOTE: cytheflyguy

Flash counter, I don't trust the nos wagon.

In post 3782, Titus wrote:VOTE: cytheflyguy

Flash counter, I don't trust the nos wagon.

This is honestly probably a good place to vote if you won't vote Ircher, but for real, Ircher is scum. You have no clue how frustrating it is to not be able to explain why yet.

Prod dodge until I post more stuff tomorrow.

In post 3777, Nahdia wrote:nahdia is town.

sorry i was too lazy to unvote zakk.

VOTE: Nosferatu

L-1

you were voting me not zakk. Also I just still don't see this nos case... any one what I do see is an overly eager ircher.

I already stated before I'm okay with lynching Nos.

Cy and Zakk I could lupynch too. Also Liger.

In post 3767, zakk wrote:i'm more interested in lynching nos and nahdia than anyone else right now

Why exactly are you interested in lynching Nahdia? Explain that position.

In post 3782, Titus wrote:VOTE: cytheflyguy

Flash counter, I don't trust the nos wagon.

In post 3769, SirCakez wrote:

Nosferatu (5) - projectmatt, Liger_zero, Lowell, zakk, cytheflyguy

Add in Nahdia’s L-1 vote and the wagon is

PMatt, Liger, Lowell, zakk, Cy, and Nahdia

So who are you scum reading besides CY on this wagon that makes you distrust it again? Certainly not Nahdia or Lowell from your interactions with them.

I gave intent fyi Magna

In post 3789, Ircher wrote:I gave intent fyi Magna

Yes, I get that. Are you saying I should have included you in my "Why is Titus wanting another counter-wagon" post?

Probably....

Ok ... amend the wagon to be

PMatt, Liger, Lowell, zakk, Cy, Nahdia and Ircher

In post 2946, Ircher wrote:Meh, I still think Kop is scum, esp. with the way Lowell got off the wagon.
VOTE: Kop

L-1

In post 2967, Ircher wrote:...VOTE: Lowell

Srry Copper and Kop........ Lowell's prob. scum tho.

In post 3069, Ircher wrote:

In post 3065, Lowell wrote:stuff

Way to misrepresent what prople said.
VOTE: Lowell - Shotty - Bus Lowell and we may give you some towncred

In post 3115, Ircher wrote:UNVOTE: Lowell

In post 3127, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Shaz

I've been feeling this midway D2 tbh, I just had more important concerns (Kop, Lowell)

In post 3362, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Liger

I trust Magna 650% more.

In post 3434, Ircher wrote:

In post 3430, zakk wrote:Let's lynch cy or Titus

Fine, lynch Cy.
VOTE: Cythefly

In post 3499, Ircher wrote:

VOTE:

Ircher

In post 3544, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Shotty

In post 3741, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Zakk

Pedit:@Shotty -- Your breadcrumb is genuine, so I'll buy the claim for now.

I see no real train of thought here other than

"oh this wagon is popular now? vote: thiswagon"

Hey zakk answer the question -

Why do you want to lynch Nahdia?

In post 3793, zakk wrote:

In post 2946, Ircher wrote:Meh, I still think Kop is scum, esp. with the way Lowell got off the wagon.
VOTE: Kop

L-1

In post 2967, Ircher wrote:...VOTE: Lowell

Srry Copper and Kop........ Lowell's prob. scum tho.

I pushed the Kop wagon and was the main proponent. I got off for awhile when Zakk wanted extra time, but got back on cuz I was fairly certain Kop was scum.

In post 3069, Ircher wrote:

In post 3065, Lowell wrote:stuff

Way to misrepresent what prople said.
VOTE: Lowell - Shotty - Bus Lowell and we may give you some towncred

I also explained this vote too.

In post 3115, Ircher wrote:UNVOTE: Lowell

The unvote came post claim.

In post 3127, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Shaz

I've been feeling this midway D2 tbh, I just had more important concerns (Kop, Lowell)

Mainly having to do with Shaz's D2 inconsistency; again, context would show my vote was reasonable.

In post 3362, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Liger

I trust Magna 650% more.

Liger or Magna suggested lynching in the neighborhood today; I prefered to lynch Liger over Magna.

In post 3434, Ircher wrote:

In post 3430, zakk wrote:Let's lynch cy or Titus

Fine, lynch Cy.
VOTE: Cythefly

You said lynch Titus or Cy. I scumread Cy but townread Titus, so hence my vote.

In post 3499, Ircher wrote:

VOTE:

Ircher

That's me trolling.

In post 3544, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Shotty

OMGUS in a way I believe.

In post 3741, Ircher wrote:VOTE: Zakk

Pedit:@Shotty -- Your breadcrumb is genuine, so I'll buy the claim for now.

This is post-Shotty claim which I believed cuz of the breadcrumb.

I see no real train of thought here other than

"oh this wagon is popular now? vote: thiswagon"

Spoiler:

Practically only 1 of them did I barely give any reasoning for at all; what you did was ISO me and ignore all the context surrounding the votes.

I don't see a problem with ircher's vote-hopping. I tend to see it as more of a town move, since it draws attention (a) from everyone you vote, and (b) from anyone doing zakk-type vote analysis. If there's one unifying theory of scum, it's that they want to avoid attention while appearing not to.

In post 3788, MagnaofIllusion wrote:

In post 3767, zakk wrote:i'm more interested in lynching nos and nahdia than anyone else right now

Why exactly are you interested in lynching Nahdia? Explain that position.

i just don't trust that i can read her well and that's always something i try to lynch sooner

plus i'm vaguely suspicious that the reason she kneeeewwwwwww anen was scum was because she knew

plus she's been very buddying of me so far

that simultaneously warms my cockles yet raises my hackles

In post 3796, Lowell wrote:I don't see a problem with ircher's vote-hopping. I tend to see it as more of a town move, since it draws attention (a) from everyone you vote, and (b) from anyone doing zakk-type vote analysis. If there's one unifying theory of scum, it's that they want to avoid attention while appearing not to.

yeah. i think i agree with this.

In post 3795, Ircher wrote:Practically only 1 of them did I barely give any reasoning for at all; what you did was ISO me and ignore all the context surrounding the votes.

yeah that is basically exactly what i did

i'm trying to discern a pattern not argue that you shouldn't have voted

the "pattern" was that you were vote hopping without really a pattern


also i wanted to post that meme i made