Page 154 of 256
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:20 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 3759, Iecerint wrote:I don't buy DGB's claim.
1. If her claim were as she says, she would have reacted differently to IKS's claim D1 (e.g., because townDGB would instantly infer that IKS was scum, for the same reason that people are now inferring that DGB's claim implies she is town due to scumIKS). This is particularly true because IIRC she was saying that IKS was scum while voting NPOM with me D1. This is why I think she is not town with the role she says she has.
2. Bambi already claimed another version of IKS's claim. Bambi's claim seems related to something that happened to multiple players N2 and is relatively verified (though it's not impossible that the action could be an omni-fruit vender). So far as I have experienced them, Baker's games are "bastard" in name only -- they're similar to ordinary Theme games on the site from the early 2010s. This is why I think the role is probably fabricated, rather than "the role that scumDGB has."
3. DGB's claim is an ideal scum fakeclaim. She can continue to fabricate it as the game goes on. Her note that abilities are "probabilistic" gives her even more flexibility in fakeclaiming as the game goes on.
You're scum, bye!
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:24 am
by DrippingGoofball
TD is town.
He does a wall of text and votes Pooky? That's pretty ballsy in this game state. A suicidal move for scum.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:28 am
by DrippingGoofball
@TD
https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.p ... #p12132752
You said this has a nonzero chance of being a scum slip. How?
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:35 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 3782, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote: In post 3776, TiphaineDeath wrote:Hard Town: Pisskop/DGB/BEF/Gamma/A50
VI: NPOM
Very unsure: CHK/Galron/Dave(Dave feels Townie AF, but leia was scum and I am conflicted)
Scum: Starbuck/Grendel/Pooky
3P: Bambi
this readslist looks like it was drawn by a 2nd grader who hasn't figured out he's not supposed to eat crayons yet.
You may say that if you haven't bothered reading the rest of his post.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:40 am
by DrippingGoofball
In post 3820, Grendel wrote:
I was talking about TheDrippingGoofball not you.
Can you tell me why you town read TDG currently?
Please. Call me DGB.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:41 am
by NoPowerOverMe
Death and dripping are Town reading each other there's a surprise. Rolls eyes.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:42 am
by DrippingGoofball
Scum hates a TOWNBLOK™
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:50 am
by Doctor Drew
It did make me say hmmm when they all of a sudden town read each other.
But, DGB does make a great point about TD's vote coupled with NPOM making another superficial read I feel ok they probably are town.
VOTE: NPOM really sticking to my guns this time, not moving off unless something crazy happens.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:51 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
we are going back here again
VOTE: NPOM
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:52 am
by NoPowerOverMe
Rolls eyes again.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:52 am
by NoPowerOverMe
What's the definition of insanity?
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:52 am
by a2rudeboy
In post 3817, Grendel wrote: In post 3814, a2rudeboy wrote:NPOM- Explain to me how having a lurker remain in the game is beneficial to town. Maybe a town PR would lurk for a while to try and avoid the NK. But other than that, I can't really see much benefit.
So is this an agenda you take with you every game or...?
I honestly haven't played a game on site, or on any other site, in ten years. When I played, I signed up for too many games at once, which led to me lurking and prodging, until I just gave up completely. Most of those games I was auto-eliminated for active lurking.
Now that I've come back, I actually want to play. And I want the other slots in the game, especially such a large one, to be at least semi-active as well.
My vote for Lavender is a combination of her lurking, beetlejuicing, prodging, and promising content without delivering (with one notable exception). Are these scum-tells? Not in themselves. Are they beneficial to town? No.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:53 am
by a2rudeboy
In post 3822, NoPowerOverMe wrote: In post 3814, a2rudeboy wrote:NPOM- Explain to me how having a lurker remain in the game is beneficial to town. Maybe a town PR would lurk for a while to try and avoid the NK. But other than that, I can't really see much benefit.
Explain how having scum in the game is beneficial to town?
Deflection without answering, noted.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:53 am
by PookyTheMagicalBear
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:54 am
by Almost50
I
feel
see that you're calling almost half of the player roaster "Scum". Can I get a list of your TRs??
P.S. I dashed out "feel" because you used the term to make it look like I was making things up, when -in fact- I was trying to be reasonable rather than overly assertive.
P.P.S. Off the top of my head, you SR NPOM, CHK, Iec, myself, one of TD/Starbuck (don't remember which), Pooky, Bambi, and possibly lav (not sure about this one, so don't give me shit if I misremember). Does this look like a reasonable proposition to you? I mean, you're not calling them "scummy", but outright "Scum". Do you think the game is Multiball??
P-edit: OK, so it's Starbuck that you SR? Or maybe I am mixing someone else's read with yours, bur only because I've seen you respond to many players with your trademark phrase "you're scum"
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:55 am
by Doctor Drew
Super late Post Edit: By they I mean DGB and TD if it wasn't obvious.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:56 am
by Doctor Drew
In post 3837, a2rudeboy wrote: In post 3822, NoPowerOverMe wrote: In post 3814, a2rudeboy wrote:NPOM- Explain to me how having a lurker remain in the game is beneficial to town. Maybe a town PR would lurk for a while to try and avoid the NK. But other than that, I can't really see much benefit.
Explain how having scum in the game is beneficial to town?
Deflection without answering, noted.
Why would he start answering direct questions now?
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 11:59 am
by a2rudeboy
I mean, we got Lav to post actual content once...
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 12:03 pm
by NoPowerOverMe
I'm shivering at the thought of goofball and deaths two-player Town block.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 12:09 pm
by Almost50
Does anyone think I'm conf!biased against DGB??
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 12:11 pm
by NoPowerOverMe
No.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 12:22 pm
by DrippingGoofball
In post 3836, a2rudeboy wrote:My vote for Lavender is a combination of her lurking, beetlejuicing, prodging, and promising content without delivering (with one notable exception). Are these scum-tells? Not in themselves
In my book, they are scum tells.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 12:30 pm
by davesaz
In post 3837, a2rudeboy wrote: In post 3822, NoPowerOverMe wrote: In post 3814, a2rudeboy wrote:NPOM- Explain to me how having a lurker remain in the game is beneficial to town. Maybe a town PR would lurk for a while to try and avoid the NK. But other than that, I can't really see much benefit.
Explain how having scum in the game is beneficial to town?
Deflection without answering, noted.
If you have a choice between someone you think is scum and a lurker, would you choose scum first?
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 12:49 pm
by chkflip
VOTE: DrippingGoofball
I forgot Baker literally just had a probability-based scum role. I'm dumb. Township rescinded.
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2020 12:51 pm
by TiphaineDeath
It's setup-spec DGB. If scum got role-pm's earlier to have a chance to talk in PT pre-day then they may either have not received the game-start PM or NPOM may have been already "in-game" as he saw it, and so wasn't looking for one like the rest of us were. It's a weak tell, and I've been trying to play off perceived scumslips less since I am often wrong on them, but it pinged me.