Posted: Thu Oct 01, 2020 12:39 pm
personally
VOTE: Something smart
VOTE: Something smart
Speak a name into the ether?In post 3824, The Bulge wrote:like how much info are weIn post 3820, The Bulge wrote:while we're talking about how bad it is to kill players everyone agrees on, when was the last time we all had a serious discussion about wagonning someone who is not mariab/alisae/420?reallybanking on if whichever of these we go with flips green? given that everyone for the most part seems pretty in-line with this limpool.
probably not enough time left for there to be any serious consideration for anyone else, given the current game state (specifically, i don't know if there's a name outside of them that enough people feel pretty strongly about)In post 3820, The Bulge wrote:while we're talking about how bad it is to kill players everyone agrees on, when was the last time we all had a serious discussion about wagonning someone who is not mariab/alisae/420?
In post 3831, morph the cat wrote:Something something data for the data gods.
it's not like we only have wagonomics on our side? we have 150+ pages peppered with peoples opinions of s_sIn post 3833, midwaybear wrote:Vanity and flash wagon don’t go together. I don’t think he is a good option for today.
indeed, this is what i meant when i said it doesn't make sense to try less than usual in a game where you have a short shelf-life and ideally wanna be as accurate as possible about the one thing it's important you get correctIn post 3830, morph the cat wrote:somehow should be trusted to get a vig shot with even higher than average negative utility.
yes and even if I didn't the potential upside to giving them a day to prove would outweigh the potential downside.In post 3827, zMuffinMan wrote:i take it you think mariaboy is town now something_smart?
I don't know, I don't really have any. I wouldn't oppose killing 420.In post 3827, zMuffinMan wrote:what do your scum reads look like now?
whatIn post 3830, morph the cat wrote:The thing is, I'm not sure i WANT that slot to be able to act, regardless. So if they're town, we saved ourselves from two players who couldn't be bothered to catch up OR even ask for the entire role PM, but somehow should be trusted to get a vig shot with even higher than average negative utility.
they can claim that tomorrow then? If they're town they can say who they picked, and we can decide what to do at that point.In post 3807, morph the cat wrote:the shot choice is data.
Yeah, I didn't mean it was data we can only get today. My point was that leashing actually fuzzes up that data.In post 3845, Remilia Scarlet wrote:they can claim that tomorrow then? If they're town they can say who they picked, and we can decide what to do at that point.In post 3807, morph the cat wrote:the shot choice is data.
If they're scum then it doesn't matter what they "pick"
wordIn post 3847, morph the cat wrote:Yeah, I didn't mean it was data we can only get today. My point was that leashing actually fuzzes up that data.In post 3845, Remilia Scarlet wrote:they can claim that tomorrow then? If they're town they can say who they picked, and we can decide what to do at that point.In post 3807, morph the cat wrote:the shot choice is data.
If they're scum then it doesn't matter what they "pick"