Mafiascum.net

I don't feel like you give the scum a jailkeeper to block a voyeur. Protecting against the vigilante thing makes some sense sure it just doesn't feel like it fits enough in here maybe. Maybe it's just Titus/Andre.

In post 1225, Nero Cain wrote:if im a vig I vig petapan
if I'm an investigation role I target Andre
if I'm a doc I'll protect VPF

This is also reason to think Andre could be scum.

In post 1103, Nero Cain wrote:honestly, I'm just kinda sick of the day phase at this point. I'd be willing to vote any of

Dragon of the West
Rathe
Andresvmb
nomnomnom
DrippingGoofball
Titus
petapan




kinda just want to lynch the Derek12 so this game doesn't stall out b/c no one will replace in

There's also this pool. Does Nero got night killed for having one scum in the pool and one just "no content kill em" mention? Now if Rathe is scum, it would be two scum in the pool but then again the pool is 7 people so I don't think scum would mind if Nero began ripping through the list like this if only 1 or 2 was scum. But he was bringing a lot of pressure to nom/Titus/Andre.

In post 3825, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't feel like you give the scum a jailkeeper to block a voyeur. Protecting against the vigilante thing makes some sense sure it just doesn't feel like it fits enough in here maybe. Maybe it's just Titus/Andre.

As jailkeeper you could either roleblock the vig/babysitter or you could jailkeep a scum teammate that you think the vig/babysitter will target and kill the vig/babysitter without your teammate dying. Both of those are strong options to have when the vig/babysitter is also vengeful so mislimming them is dangerous

So we should look for people defending that slot.

In post 2204, Vaxkiller wrote:I also have a hard time entertaining the idea that scum somehow blocks town!anya last night.

Just found this nugget lol

In post 2456, Rathe wrote:anyway i think we have talked mechanics enough who r u voting dwlee voting me or t3 is not good

Not sure if this was because Dwlee was scumreading T3 at the time but this would've been a perfect chance for Rathe to drop STD as a bad vote

In post 1843, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 1838, Dwlee99 wrote:Babysitter enabler allows the babysitter to do their actions. An enabler role could be either alignment.

It's a pro town role tho. If scum had it, wouldn't they just mega bus that player for street cred and no more baby sitters?

Don't mind me just quoting interesting things. Vax didn't have to jump in to say anything here but chose to

In post 2181, Dwlee99 wrote:T3 if that's all you have to say I'm pretty sure you're scum.

In post 2187, Dwlee99 wrote:Sheep me vote t3.

In post 2198, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: Rathe

In post 3831, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 2456, Rathe wrote:anyway i think we have talked mechanics enough who r u voting dwlee voting me or t3 is not good

Not sure if this was because Dwlee was scumreading T3 at the time but this would've been a perfect chance for Rathe to drop STD as a bad vote

In post 1799, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: STD

In post 1827, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: T3
Okay I'll buy it

Sorry they're out of order, on mobile so formatting is a pain rn but Dwlee was pushing T3 so I can see Rathe just responding to that but right before T3 Dwlee was on STD

In post 3833, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 2181, Dwlee99 wrote:T3 if that's all you have to say I'm pretty sure you're scum.

In post 2187, Dwlee99 wrote:Sheep me vote t3.

In post 2198, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: Rathe

In post 3831, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 2456, Rathe wrote:anyway i think we have talked mechanics enough who r u voting dwlee voting me or t3 is not good

Not sure if this was because Dwlee was scumreading T3 at the time but this would've been a perfect chance for Rathe to drop STD as a bad vote

In post 1799, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: STD

In post 1827, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: T3
Okay I'll buy it

Sorry they're out of order, on mobile so formatting is a pain rn but Dwlee was pushing T3 so I can see Rathe just responding to that but right before T3 Dwlee was on STD

Given rathe's posting style I think it's likely he's responding to recent events. As I recall he rarely quotes and is almost always in the moment

In post 3825, Dwlee99 wrote:I don't feel like you give the scum a jailkeeper to block a voyeur. Protecting against the vigilante thing makes some sense sure it just doesn't feel like it fits enough in here maybe. Maybe it's just Titus/Andre.

What about caging the vig though? I think voyeur can be strong if the BS/Vig has claimed as it would see a jailkeep happen on the claimed PR. That's probably why it is X-shot, so it cant be used to "rolecop" the jailkeeper, and also potentially confirm PT Cop and BS/Vig.

I'm hard lurking this game. Consider me your personak sheep on any wagon in the poe.

Hang on I just had a thought.
So I don’t think it’s unclear that T3’s play has been bothering me more than a little. I’ve been feeling like I wasted my action by checking someone like him, who seems to have taken it as an excuse to crank up the slank, but I just realized my perspective was wrong. What I’ve proven is that T3 can only be traitor scum. As such the smart way to handle the bothersome behavior is trying to figure out who it points to as groupscum
UNVOTE:
Because I think the first step on this road is realizing T3 seems okay with me or Titus getting yeeted, so until I figure out T3 is not traitor I don’t want to full send on Titus.

To be clear: the idea is to read T3’s actions and behavior and see who it points to as groupscum, and if there’s no real logic I can come up with as to who T3’s buddies are, I’ll probably just write him off as town.

Fair. I actually just finished a game as traitor so if you want you can look at that game and se how I treat other players there vs. here.

I feel like Gamma is trying to add doubt and confusion to the mix her with T3 for the sake of doing it.

In post 3829, Titus wrote:So we should look for people defending that slot.

This is you

Alright what are we doing.

In post 3826, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1225, Nero Cain wrote:if im a vig I vig petapan
if I'm an investigation role I target Andre
if I'm a doc I'll protect VPF

This is also reason to think Andre could be scum.

I’m not Scum. So whatever you’re wrong.

So who is scum, Andre?

In post 3843, VFP wrote:So who is scum, Andre?

Look, we know DotW isn’t worth touching. I think you, T3, and Kyouko are Town. And I’m fine with DW though they keep constantly proposing me which fine I’ve sucked this game it happens.

Titus probably needs to eat rope at some point. I probably should too but Titus first. And we can execute Gamma if we collectively feel mechanically it makes sense. I don’t necessarily see Rathe being Scum, but I’ve been tricked by the slot before. That’s where I am.

I’m on a plane for 3 hours. If I find a way to get WiFi I’ll read for those three hours. Otherwise you guys will have to wait on me.

Why SSBM as town?

In post 3845, Andresvmb wrote:I’m on a plane for 3 hours. If I find a way to get WiFi I’ll read for those three hours. Otherwise you guys will have to wait on me.

I'm happy to wait.

Andre can you give quick thoughts on the people you didn't list?

In post 3839, VFP wrote:I feel like Gamma is trying to add doubt and confusion to the mix her with T3 for the sake of doing it.

Agreed.