Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 2:23 pm
I self referred my two smurfs and I'm scared of the crackdown right now :/
Page 1536 of 2016
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:02 pm
The crackdown is more on accounts that have done it in large quantities... Enough to get he limited skins and thousands of Riot Points.
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 3:09 pm
Ill find it later but riot flat out said they don't care about smurfs coming from the main in quantities lower than 5
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 4:10 pm
Posted: Sun Dec 21, 2014 10:28 pm
http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends. ... b=overview
rek is just crazy op
does anyone else say that?
rek is just crazy op
does anyone else say that?
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 4:14 am
Currently watching nightblue play poacher's jungle nunu
THE BUFF CONTROL
THE BUFF CONTROL
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:01 am
↑ Klazam wrote:http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends. ... b=overview
rek is just crazy op
does anyone else say that?
My friend is a rek'sai main at this point. The things he can do with her are crazy.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 5:47 am
Could you talk me through the rationale for your wukong jungle pathing?
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:26 am
Spoiler: #ButThat'sNoneOfMyBusiness
On an unrelated note, I forgot how utterly, utterly awful doing calibration matches on a (technically fresh) account is. 3 toplaners who all went 0/5 in the first 15 minutes, a jungler and me who stupidly first picked a support sure is a fun and productive use of 20 minutes.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 7:30 am
The only reason I'd start krugs if I was a heavy auto-attack based champion(ex. xin zhao, warwick). The stun, while nice to have, still leave you on lower health then starting red buff with a leash would. Smiting red buff allows you bonus HP when smited, the red buff true damage on auto, and the HP regen that red buff also provides now. This camp will get you to level 2, allowing you do to wolves/birds and blue buff and get to 3.
The next decision is between wolves and raptors/chickens/birds/etc. Simply put, wolves do less damage. Blue buff doesn't pose too much of a problem at this point, because I generally have both pots left. I use one here, then grab the crab afterwrads for even more HP.
I don't use this route for just wukong. I use it for everyone. If you're playing J4 or some such early game ganking champ, you can gank immediately and have no problems. If you're playing a farm champ like wukong, you can clear without problem.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 11:15 am
I'm glad you quoted this. Still my favorite quote in the thread.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 4:38 pm
↑ animorpherv1 wrote:raptors/chickens/birds/etc.
I really wish they actually gave them a better name.
Not sure how we got to this, but buckbeak's is the term me and my mates are using.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:18 pm
Klaz is gonna post about it - I AM SORRY.
I KSed him to get back for an earlier KS but I didn't realize he'd just gotten a quad because my sound was down so I'm a total dick AND it would've been his first penta if I hadn't done it. :/
I KSed him to get back for an earlier KS but I didn't realize he'd just gotten a quad because my sound was down so I'm a total dick AND it would've been his first penta if I hadn't done it. :/
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:22 pm
wasn't gonna post about it
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:23 pm
I watched this happen he so totally did it on purpose.
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2014 9:57 pm
I didn't 
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 12:08 am
http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends. ... ticipant=3
I was the thresh, but am I missing something here or is this a SUPER bad way to build nami when behind?
I was the thresh, but am I missing something here or is this a SUPER bad way to build nami when behind?
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 6:43 am
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 7:57 am
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 8:22 am
↑ Cabd wrote:http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends. ... ticipant=3
I was the thresh, but am I missing something here or is this a SUPER bad way to build nami when behind?
Not only is that
maybe
not how I'd build Nami when behind, but Quinn ADC is obviously bad and I don't know much about Cho'Gath but is Nashor's actually something you should build on him?! 
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 9:04 am
uh, i've never went nashor's. if I'm super fed, maybe?
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 1:58 pm
wouldn't Wit's End be better than Nashor's on Cho since it reduces/steals MR?
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 2:00 pm
↑ Voidedmafia wrote:wouldn't Wit's End be better than Nashor's on Cho since it reduces/steals MR?
Yes.
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 4:50 pm
No.
The 20%cdr is god on cho
The 20%cdr is god on cho
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2014 9:51 pm
Can't see the match history, but nashor's tooth on cho is only viable if you're going full 100% ap squishy style type nonsense.
Proper cho is with wit's end, if you're choosing between one or the other.
Personally don't feel either one's particularly good.
Proper cho is with wit's end, if you're choosing between one or the other.
Personally don't feel either one's particularly good.