Page 155 of 165

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:54 am
by DrippingGoofball
Iecerint wrote:Short Version
1. Dram targeted TheTrollie N6, and he only targeted TheTrollie N6. Dram is lying, my action was messed with, or dram's action was messed with.
2. One of the unflipped scum may be a ninja.


TheTrollie died N6, right????

Am I missing something?

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:03 am
by zoraster
I am pretty awesome, and you're cornered scum. Logic here should tell you that a townie confirming me as town from the mod assures that I am town. The alternative is a hugely twisted attempt to find ways that it wouldn't happen. I appreciate the attempt given process of elimination leads to you, but it's pretty eye rollingly contrived.

I think it's time to decide whether to lynch dram or dgb, JK the other. Iec has the power here, so I think Iec chooses who goes first.

By the way,
Iec
if for some reason we lynch town (i.e. if zoid is scum instead of whoever we lynch), don't JK at all. From scum's perspective, if they assume you're town, that'll assure that scum are basically forced to crosskill or else they face a losing game.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:14 am
by dramonic
zoraster wrote:I am pretty awesome, and you're cornered scum. Logic here should tell you that a townie confirming me as town from the mod assures that I am town. The alternative is a hugely twisted attempt to find ways that it wouldn't happen. I appreciate the attempt given process of elimination leads to you, but it's pretty eye rollingly contrived.

I think it's time to decide whether to lynch dram or dgb, JK the other. Iec has the power here, so I think Iec chooses who goes first.

By the way,
Iec
if for some reason we lynch town (i.e. if zoid is scum instead of whoever we lynch), don't JK at all. From scum's perspective, if they assume you're town, that'll assure that scum are basically forced to crosskill or else they face a losing game.

Please dont ignore my post completely, kthx

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:15 am
by DrippingGoofball
zoraster wrote:Logic here should tell you that a townie confirming me as town from the mod assures that I am town.


That's what you hope for.

Om never gave the wording of the message.

YOU are cornered scum.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:17 am
by DrippingGoofball
zoraster wrote:Really, I was mostly just bullshitting to put dram in an awkward position,


yeah, and that and the claim stalling.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:20 am
by zoraster
dramonic wrote:Could also be a dreaming god ability for all we know.

Zoidberg cant be mafia

If iece isn't town we're entirely fucked.

DGB could be either really.

If DGB flips sk, one of me or zoraster is mafia. Mod has confirmed block cant be redirected, so I say I should be jked. That way, if you think I'm scum I can't shoot someone and quicklynch zor, and if its zor the quicklynch thing won't happen.

If dgb flips mafia redirector, that will prove I didn't lie about my action to iece and it puts the sk between zoid and zor. Block zoid for same reason you'd block me.

If dgb flips mafia anything else, I'm super confused.

if dgb flips town, iece should probably not act and hope scumkills.


Thoughts



sorry, missed it with all of the noise from DGB.

From my perspective, this only worries me because of the off chance you might be strongman or something.

That said, the chance of seeing if DGB is mafia redirector is interesting as this would in some way validate you, though obviously not totally.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:21 am
by zoraster
DrippingGoofball wrote:
zoraster wrote:Really, I was mostly just bullshitting to put dram in an awkward position,


yeah, and that and the claim stalling.


you'll have to tell me after the game whether you're actually incapable of telling the difference between solid evidence and slight scum-read type "evidence" or if you're just playing this up.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:54 am
by Iecerint
@ DGB -- I do not understand that you think you could be missing...yes, dram either killed Trollie, or shenanigans happened to make it look that way.

But if dramScum killed Trollie, his plan for D7 was to frame and lynch Zora. This seems like a crappy scumplan, 's the main reason I'm entertaining the latter.

@ dram/zora -- Yeah, I know.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 4:58 am
by dramonic
my grand master plan was to spend the entire D6 trying to get trollie lynched and saying its fucking retarded to nightkill trollie for scum, and THEN to kill him
I love contradicting myself <3

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:08 am
by zoraster
i mean, that seems a pretty coherent scum strategy?

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:24 am
by dramonic
Not if one is convinced that trollie will mislynch.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:31 am
by zoraster
sometimes scum say one thing and believe another. not really a surprise there. especially if scum think it'll set up this type of argument.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:37 am
by zoraster
can we review why zoidberg "can't" be the scum?

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 12:27 pm
by Zoidberg
Because I'm not in dram's QT.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:17 pm
by dramonic
zoraster wrote:can we review why zoidberg "can't" be the scum?

Under the premise that dgb got dick and I got redirected and two kills happened.
He can be sk though

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:43 pm
by zoraster
so couldn't he have redirected and killed last night? i guess it'd be pretty weird to have a mafia fruit vendor, but not unheard of.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 1:47 pm
by Zoidberg
zoraster wrote:so couldn't he have redirected and killed last night? i guess it'd be pretty weird to have a mafia fruit vendor, but not unheard of.


I could have vended fruit and killed, but not vended fruit, redirected, and also killed. Unless I was a multi-targeting, fruit-vending, scum redirector.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 2:59 pm
by zoraster
did i miss who got your fruit last night?

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 3:38 pm
by dramonic
Dgb did

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:42 pm
by Zoidberg
Assuming of course Dram actually was redirected.

Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 5:58 pm
by dramonic
If I wasnt im either mafia, in whica case you aren't, or sk, in which case I have no reason to try to avert suspicion grok you.

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:53 am
by DrippingGoofball
Do we have any evidence of any action having been redirected?

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:41 am
by dramonic
All you have is my word for it.
Its very compelling.

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:47 am
by DrippingGoofball
[paranoia]Could Iecerint-scum have an occasional redirection in his nightly arsenal? Because if there was a consecrated redirector, we'd have seen evidence of it already.[/paranoia]

Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:52 am
by zoraster
could, but as he's pretty much provided us our only proactive way of winning (as opposed to praying for cross kills), we're kind of left with no choice.