In post 3896, pieguyn wrote:if you read my posts since daystart, you'll find that I've at least already answered that from my end.
p-edit: @Dunn re 3889
Saying you want to lynch a bunch of other people before your pair doesn't exactly inspire confidence. I thought you wanted to lynch Shadow because you wanted to discuss with Kagami? There seems to be a mutual lack of that
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:14 am
by FakeGod
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:14 am
by pieguyn
In post 3898, inspectorscout wrote:I do think parama's agression and just posting whatever is on her mind is townie, although i kind of dislike her case on arthur.
"aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" aren't good reasons to seriously town read someone at this point in the game.
Parama: read my fucking posts.
HS: still possibly scum, but that depends on the current flips. I'd much rather get pie-smith lynched right now.
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:15 am
by pieguyn
In post 3900, Dunnstral wrote:Saying you want to lynch a bunch of other people before your pair doesn't exactly inspire confidence. I thought you wanted to lynch Shadow because you wanted to discuss with Kagami? There seems to be a mutual lack of that
for one, Kagami has already commented on my reads and said we were mostly on the same page.
we don't seem to strongly disagree on anyone besides HS, and we seem to agree on Parama regardless, so... /shrug
don't really know what your point here is
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:15 am
by Dunnstral
In post 3899, pieguyn wrote:how do you possibly justify keeping Jester alive?
There are two pairs that are scummier
I didn't say I thought jester pair was town. They're my third choice for a lynch. Kagami really wants to lynch that pair as well.
I think the first two pairs I mentioned definitely contain scum. Even if that scum ends up being you. I haven't liked your entrance into today.
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:16 am
by Parama
@dunn why is HS scum
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:16 am
by mhsmith0
In post 3898, inspectorscout wrote:'Its possible that shes scum protecting her lover but here she might not be doing it' is a perfect example of not taking a stance in a discussion that can go either way.
The whole post's tone is bad, i hope you can see that
"Hey scout I think this was null and you just argued that it was alignment-indicative; justify why you thought it was alignment-indicative". The point I was making was clear; now that I'm asking it for the THIRD TIME how about actually answering the question instead of going "gee that was a bad post by smith".
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:17 am
by Parama
honestly the frustration coming from mds and jester feels pretty genuine and on top of that sadboy was pushing the lynch in a cruddy way yesterday & he's scum so i really don't want to lynch the pair today
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:17 am
by Parama
also @ mds: a slot that may or may not catch-up and post is 100% better than a slot that literally doesn't post
In post 3900, Dunnstral wrote:Saying you want to lynch a bunch of other people before your pair doesn't exactly inspire confidence. I thought you wanted to lynch Shadow because you wanted to discuss with Kagami? There seems to be a mutual lack of that
for one, Kagami has already commented on my reads and said we were mostly on the same page.
we don't seem to strongly disagree on anyone besides HS, and we seem to agree on Parama regardless, so... /shrug
don't really know what your point here is
Looks like you're making up reasons to lynch other people without outright defending mhsmith (which you can't really do if you're scum and he's town since his scumminess levels were way up there)
In post 3898, inspectorscout wrote:I do think parama's agression and just posting whatever is on her mind is townie, although i kind of dislike her case on arthur.
"aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" aren't good reasons to seriously town read someone at this point in the game.
I also said that i dislike her push on arthur and that her whatever is townie, not locktown.
If you want serious walls of reasoning why someone is scum/town, dont ask me.
Can you give decent reasoning on why you think that i am town?
In post 3900, Dunnstral wrote:Saying you want to lynch a bunch of other people before your pair doesn't exactly inspire confidence. I thought you wanted to lynch Shadow because you wanted to discuss with Kagami? There seems to be a mutual lack of that
for one, Kagami has already commented on my reads and said we were mostly on the same page.
we don't seem to strongly disagree on anyone besides HS, and we seem to agree on Parama regardless, so... /shrug
don't really know what your point here is
Actually...
@pie: what do you think of kagami just doing a quick "I agree with pie with a small difference on HS, I vote jester" pop-in? Is that level of post about what you normally would expect from her at this point?
I think I've gone into detail on the subject during day 1.
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:20 am
by Parama
point me at it then, whatever
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:20 am
by Parama
i want to see your points so i can dismantle them
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:21 am
by mhsmith0
In post 3910, Dunnstral wrote:Looks like you're making up reasons to lynch other people without outright defending mhsmith (which you can't really do if you're scum and he's town since his scumminess levels were way up there)
I honestly don't know how you can actually think "his scumminess levels were way up there"; I remain skeptical that town!you is THAT bad at reading me.
In post 3898, inspectorscout wrote:I do think parama's agression and just posting whatever is on her mind is townie, although i kind of dislike her case on arthur.
"aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" aren't good reasons to seriously town read someone at this point in the game.
Alright. Why should people be town reading you at this point in the game?
After all, isn't "aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" your game so far?
Follow-up question: Who's townreading you, and what's your opinion on them
In post 3898, inspectorscout wrote:'Its possible that shes scum protecting her lover but here she might not be doing it' is a perfect example of not taking a stance in a discussion that can go either way.
The whole post's tone is bad, i hope you can see that
"Hey scout I think this was null and you just argued that it was alignment-indicative; justify why you thought it was alignment-indicative". The point I was making was clear; now that I'm asking it for the THIRD TIME how about actually answering the question instead of going "gee that was a bad post by smith".
But I answered the question? You even quoted it? You didn't take any stance and suggested stuff that isnt even useful.
Its like dunn as scum in hunger games said 'this nightkill points to x being scum but wifom so lol'
Its scummy because you are mentioning the events rather than discussing them.
In post 3910, Dunnstral wrote:Looks like you're making up reasons to lynch other people without outright defending mhsmith (which you can't really do if you're scum and he's town since his scumminess levels were way up there)
I honestly don't know how you can actually think "his scumminess levels were way up there"; I remain skeptical that town!you is THAT bad at reading me.
In post 3898, inspectorscout wrote:'Its possible that shes scum protecting her lover but here she might not be doing it' is a perfect example of not taking a stance in a discussion that can go either way.
The whole post's tone is bad, i hope you can see that
"Hey scout I think this was null and you just argued that it was alignment-indicative; justify why you thought it was alignment-indicative". The point I was making was clear; now that I'm asking it for the THIRD TIME how about actually answering the question instead of going "gee that was a bad post by smith".
Hey IS, should i just spam post this or what?
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:23 am
by mhsmith0
In post 3919, inspectorscout wrote:But I answered the question? You even quoted it? You didn't take any stance and suggested stuff that isnt even useful.
Its like dunn as scum in hunger games said 'this nightkill points to x being scum but wifom so lol'
Its scummy because you are mentioning the events rather than discussing them.
Hey scout I think this POST BY MDS was null and you just argued that THE POST BY MDS was alignment-indicative; justify why you thought it was alignment-indicative
Parama: read my fucking posts.
HS: still possibly scum, but that depends on the current flips. I'd much rather get pie-smith lynched right now.
And what flips would influence your read on HS?
Also, your undue aggression has been noted. Though I haven't read some of the posts in the middle of this day yet
Agression served with extra salt. My pleasure.
If pie-smith are town, PoE brings me to HS. If one of them isnt, i can see HS being town.
Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2016 11:25 am
by mhsmith0
In post 3874, inspectorscout wrote:Statistically speaking, scum was definitely on the wagon. This is awkward useless filler
'Id love to say x is scum but i dont want to point fingers so dont hold me accountable, lol'
Where is the town in that?
Like this is the closest you came to making a case that it was indicative, and even that was weak. But suddenly it was enough to flip your opinion on her?
