Page 158 of 170

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 3:12 am
by T S O
If you have nothing to say, you could at least vote Garmr.

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 3:46 am
by Elyse
T S O wrote:if Elyse is scum she's done a freakily good job of mimicking my thought processes on every single event.

Lol same. I keep having a flicker of doubt that you're scum only because I don't think I've seen you make it to late game before. But then I think about it and I'm like "nah". I don't think the scumteam is playing particularly well. They're not playing poorly either. I just think a lot of random things went their way and they probably took advantage of the hider mess. (I'm SO dying to know what happened there...if Spider Gwen no actioned :facepalm: ) Should it come down to it, I will reread that to see who was stirring the pot there. But hopefully we'll lynch all the scums before that.
T S O wrote:If you have nothing to say, you could at least vote Garmr.

Mhm.

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 4:28 am
by jasonT1981
Official Vote Count


Garmr
(2): T S O, Elyse

Not Voting
(6): Garmr, TheWayItEnds, ZZZX, Aneninen, Varsoon, My Other Head Is Scum

With 8 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.
Day 7 deadline(expired on 2016-02-07 15:58:50)

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:42 am
by Aneninen
Elyse wrote:
You do realize we most likely have one mislynch left, right?

Erm, no, I haven't.

Elyse wrote:
Why would you be ok with using that on yourself? It just doesn't make sense to me from a town perspective.

If I'm scummy enough I should be the mislynch. It makes sense.
However, I think I've been in a kind of "social vacuum" for a couple of Days. That usually happens whenever at least one of my reads is deeply wrong. If so, which one?

Elyse wrote:
And what don't you like about my vote?

Lacked content?

Elyse wrote:
I think Garmr is scummier than ZZZX because of PerV's vote on ZZZX. It could have been half-assed bussing or just WIFOM, but I think Garmr deserves rope just a tad more.

Bad logic.
Especially because ZZZX hasn't posted anything Today.

T S O wrote:if Elyse is scum she's done a freakily good job of mimicking my thought processes on every single event.

That's a thing I need to think about. Have I seen anything like that from Elyse before?

T S O wrote:Vote Garmr. I don't think there's anything left to be said, to be honest.

Not until ZZZX posts something.

T S O wrote:vague paranoia enters my head about garmr being scum and anen being a traitor, but it's w/e.

Erm, TSO, you assume there may be a traitor because...?
By the way, LOL! If I were Traitor the scums will have recruited me by now. Most probably at Night1/Night2. (Assuming targetting the Traitor means a recruit.)

Elyse wrote:I don't think the scumteam is playing particularly well. They're not playing poorly either. I just think a lot of random things went their way and they probably took advantage of the hider mess.

Dum-de-dum-de-dum...
I'm looking forward to reading the reactions for this.
By the way, when and why did Elyse land in the general town-pile?

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:23 am
by ZZZX
Ill post tomorrow with some thoughts. But in reality I dont have that much to say tbh. but if you want to wait then I will get somestuff out there.

-Z

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:36 am
by TheWayItEnds
T S O wrote:Garmr is still a required lynch imo.


why is this true moreso than anyone else?

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 6:46 am
by Garmr
TheWayItEnds wrote:
T S O wrote:Garmr is still a required lynch imo.


why is this true moreso than anyone else?

I'm guessing it's just a rand out of the players that are not confirmed.

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 7:04 am
by Varsoon
Yeah I think we're just lynching non-confirmed folks because cop is the best role in the game
yawn

Posted: Fri Jan 29, 2016 5:35 pm
by Elyse
Aneninen wrote:
Elyse wrote:
You do realize we most likely have one mislynch left, right?

Erm, no, I haven't.

So you're saying you haven't put any effort into solving the game? Hm.
Aneninen wrote:
Elyse wrote:
Why would you be ok with using that on yourself? It just doesn't make sense to me from a town perspective.

If I'm scummy enough I should be the mislynch. It makes sense.
However, I think I've been in a kind of "social vacuum" for a couple of Days. That usually happens whenever at least one of my reads is deeply wrong. If so, which one?

Idk what you mean here.
Aneninen wrote:
Elyse wrote:
And what don't you like about my vote?

Lacked content?

So why'd you call mine out and not TSO's? I justified my reason later so I get you saying that it has no content but neither did TSO's. It seems like you're trying to plant seeds of doubt.
Aneninen wrote:
Elyse wrote:
I think Garmr is scummier than ZZZX because of PerV's vote on ZZZX. It could have been half-assed bussing or just WIFOM, but I think Garmr deserves rope just a tad more.

Bad logic.
Especially because ZZZX hasn't posted anything Today.

Why is this bad logic and what does it have to do with ZZZX not posting? I think ZZZX is scum too, but Garmr is scummier.
Aneninen wrote:
T S O wrote:vague paranoia enters my head about garmr being scum and anen being a traitor, but it's w/e.

Erm, TSO, you assume there may be a traitor because...?
By the way, LOL! If I were Traitor the scums will have recruited me by now. Most probably at Night1/Night2. (Assuming targetting the Traitor means a recruit.)

Why would you think they would have recruited you by now?
Aneninen wrote:
Elyse wrote:I don't think the scumteam is playing particularly well. They're not playing poorly either. I just think a lot of random things went their way and they probably took advantage of the hider mess.

Dum-de-dum-de-dum...
I'm looking forward to reading the reactions for this.
By the way, when and why did Elyse land in the general town-pile?

You're gonna need to explain this one too.

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 3:44 am
by ZZZX
Well I will just get it out: I am not invested in this game at all. That much is true. But if you wana lynch me for some other reason pretending its not that then you are scum and you must be lynched for it.

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 4:28 am
by Garmr
Not much to invest in when we have so many clears.

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 4:41 am
by ZZZX
Garmr wrote:Not much to invest in when we have so many clears.

True

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 7:20 am
by Elyse
Ok we can lynch Garmr now

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 7:24 am
by Garmr
is it possible to lynch someone else because there is no case on me at all.

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 8:29 am
by Aneninen
Garmr wrote:Not much to invest in when we have so many clears.


I'm from mobile and getting drunk but this was fucking scummy.

VOTE: Garmr

And I know I'm an idiot.

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 8:56 am
by T S O
sorry darling, it's happening

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 9:04 am
by Aneninen
What is happening?

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 9:22 am
by Varsoon
VOTE: Garmr
I guess?

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 9:41 am
by T S O
That.

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 9:42 am
by T S O
I was more confident on Pere than I was on Garmr, but Garmr could easily have bussed Klingon d1. Sorry if you were town, bud.

Posted: Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:21 pm
by T S O
oh wait that wasn't hammer? vote you cretins.

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 2:55 am
by T S O
One of MOHIS, TWIE or ZZZX needs to hammer so we can get a flip. Also, mod, halve the night length from here on in? It's disproportionately large.

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:03 am
by Varsoon
I'm fine with the longer night phases, to be honest.
Gives me time to relax and focus on sipping hot cocoa and enjoying the sights and all that.

I feel like this game is caught up in being 'solved' when I'm not so sure we can really lynch down a list and get a fo-sho win here.
Someone should write out all the people we have definitely cleared, those situational-clears, and the flips/claims.
I think we need to get it all on the table so everyone's on the same page
Unless I'm the only mook not on the same page
Then, eh, guess I suck.

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:12 am
by Varsoon
Also, yes, L-1, so if Garmr is scum, dude should just let us know or something.
Image

Posted: Sun Jan 31, 2016 4:22 am
by Aneninen
Elyse wrote:So you're saying you haven't put any effort into solving the game? Hm.

That's not true. See eg. Yesterday. The fact that I didn't realize how many mislynches we have has nothing to do with it; everything else about this topic has been answered before.

Elyse wrote:
Aneninen wrote:If I'm scummy enough I should be the mislynch. It makes sense.
However, I think I've been in a kind of "social vacuum" for a couple of Days. That usually happens whenever at least one of my reads is deeply wrong. If so, which one?

Idk what you mean here.

Which part didn't you understand?
By "social vacuum" I mean that noone seems to have strong reads on me in either way nor too many players are engaging me. The thing I posted might be a reason behind.

Elyse wrote:
Aneninen wrote:
Elyse wrote:
And what don't you like about my vote?

Lacked content?

So why'd you call mine out and not TSO's? I justified my reason later so I get you saying that it has no content but neither did TSO's. It seems like you're trying to plant seeds of doubt.

Wasn't that a sheeping vote, by the way?
Also, your answer is pigeon poop: the fact that TSO gave no content alongside with the vote doesn't make your vote better.

Elyse wrote:Why is this bad logic and what does it have to do with ZZZX not posting? I think ZZZX is scum too, but Garmr is scummier.

I still don't think we should end the Day without reading anything from a widely-suspected player.

Elyse wrote:Why would you think they would have recruited you by now?

After my Day1/Day2 pigeon poop?

Elyse wrote:You're gonna need to explain this one too.

Not getting answers and reactions for this:
Elysette wrote:
I don't think the scumteam is playing particularly well. They're not playing poorly either. I just think a lot of random things went their way and they probably took advantage of the hider mess.

makes me sad.