New York 196: My Game, My Flavor Mafia (Mafia Win)

podoboq · Post Post #3925 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:48 am

In post 3924, beeboy wrote:Hey podo.
I am a dirty role fisher so can you post all the claims so far?

Let me know if I forgot anything, or misunderstood anything.

Almost50 claims jailkeeper, jailing Dunn n1
Dunn claims 1shot vig, shooting Lapsa n1
shannon claims VT
Titus claims VT
beeboy claims miller

Previous fake claims:
Dunn claimed modified mason with titus
Titus claimed mason with dunn
zach claimed mason with varsoon
varsoon claimed macho mason with zach

Lapsa was Macho Townie
Vedith was Mafia Neapolitan

beeboy · Post Post #3926 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:50 am

But... then....
A50 is probs scum

podoboq · Post Post #3927 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:52 am

In post 3926, beeboy wrote:But... then....
A50 is probs scum

Or Dunn is making bullshit up. Or mafia also shot Lapsa. Or our mod thinks that Macho works like that (I doubt it, but hey).

A50 claimed after Dunn did, because A50 thought Dunn was lying.

podoboq · Post Post #3928 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:53 am

PeregrineV is saying words. Also, he has shown that, unlike some people, he gives a fuck about finding town in this mess of a game.

In post 3895, Boem_u_dusi wrote:PeregrineV, just drop it. That's completely irrelevant. We need to focus on other things.

Fun fact, everyone. Looking for town is a bad thing.
VOTE: Boem_u_dusi

Wake1 · Post Post #3929 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:53 am

Don't forget mine podoboq. You'll have to check my ISO for clues however.

Almost50 says he Jailed Dunnstral, yet Dunnstral says he Vigged Lapsa.

If Almost50 Jailed Dunnstral then Dunnstral couldn't have Vigged Lapsa.

Could players clarify this for me please?

Titus · Post Post #3930 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:54 am

In post 3929, Wake1 wrote:Don't forget mine podoboq. You'll have to check my ISO for clues however.

Almost50 says he Jailed Dunnstral, yet Dunnstral says he Vigged Lapsa.

If Almost50 Jailed Dunnstral then Dunnstral couldn't have Vigged Lapsa.

Could players clarify this for me please?

Stop rehashing 60 pages ago. Mafia likely shot Lapsa too.

Boem_u_dusi · Post Post #3931 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:55 am

In post 3928, podoboq wrote:PeregrineV is saying words. Also, he has shown that, unlike some people, he gives a fuck about finding town in this mess of a game.

In post 3895, Boem_u_dusi wrote:PeregrineV, just drop it. That's completely irrelevant. We need to focus on other things.
Fun fact, everyone. Looking for town is a bad thing.
VOTE: Boem_u_dusi

OMGUS

Boem_u_dusi · Post Post #3932 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:55 am

In post 3929, Wake1 wrote:Don't forget mine podoboq. You'll have to check my ISO for clues however.

Almost50 says he Jailed Dunnstral, yet Dunnstral says he Vigged Lapsa.

If Almost50 Jailed Dunnstral then Dunnstral couldn't have Vigged Lapsa.

Could players clarify this for me please?

Yeah, somebody is bullshiting. Probably both of them.

Boem_u_dusi · Post Post #3933 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:56 am

Claims are cheap in this game.

podoboq · Post Post #3934 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:56 am

In post 3929, Wake1 wrote:Don't forget mine podoboq. You'll have to check my ISO for clues however.

I'm only writing down claims. If you crumbed something, I'm not including it in my claims spreadsheet.

Do you have a claim you'd like to remind me of?

Wake1 · Post Post #3935 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 6:57 am

In post 3930, Titus wrote:
In post 3929, Wake1 wrote:Don't forget mine podoboq. You'll have to check my ISO for clues however.

Almost50 says he Jailed Dunnstral, yet Dunnstral says he Vigged Lapsa.

If Almost50 Jailed Dunnstral then Dunnstral couldn't have Vigged Lapsa.

Could players clarify this for me please?
Stop rehashing 60 pages ago. Mafia likely shot Lapsa too.

With respect,

no

. I'm

not

going to be quiet because you want it that way.

And why are you bristling at me asking questions? Like who the hell made you arbiter of who asks question. Maybe you should sit down and stop trying to control people and their questions.

podoboq · Post Post #3936 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:00 am

In post 3929, Wake1 wrote:Could players clarify this for me please?

Four possibilities:
1) Dunnstral is lying
2) Almost50 is lying
3) Mafia also shot lapsa
4) Our mod thinks that macho townie dies if he's targeted, even if the person targeting him is roleblocked.

Most likely option, probably Dunnstral lying.

beeboy · Post Post #3937 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:01 am

5) Almost50 got roleblocked >_>

podoboq · Post Post #3938 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:02 am

In post 3937, beeboy wrote:5) Almost50 got roleblocked >_>

Didn't consider that one.
Good catch.

kraska77 · Post Post #3939 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:04 am

In post 3937, beeboy wrote:5) Almost50 got roleblocked >_>

He doesn't get informed that his actions were roleblocker?

kraska77 · Post Post #3940 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:05 am

Roleblocked*

podoboq · Post Post #3941 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:05 am

In post 3939, kraska77 wrote:
In post 3937, beeboy wrote:5) Almost50 got roleblocked >_>
He doesn't get informed that his actions were roleblocker?

No, it's assumed on mafiascum that you aren't informed when you are roleblocked.

Wake1 · Post Post #3942 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:06 am

A lynch on either of those two would be beneficial.

kraska77 · Post Post #3943 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:08 am

Hahahahahahahahahha

Boem_u_dusi · Post Post #3944 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:09 am

6) Almost50 was drunk when submitting the N1 action

Boem_u_dusi · Post Post #3945 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:10 am

7) The driver redirected actions

Titus · Post Post #3946 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:13 am

Driver cannot happen in a normal.

Wake1 · Post Post #3947 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:17 am

I'm willing to compromise on these lynches Day 2 thus far: Dunnstral, Boem, Titus, Almost50, Peregrine, Transcend.

Didn't include Varsoon because of his crumbing.

If evidence proves MB then everything changes.

Titus · Post Post #3948 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:18 am

In post 3947, Wake1 wrote:I'm willing to compromise on these lynches Day 2 thus far: Dunnstral, Boem, Titus, Almost50, Peregrine, Transcend.

Didn't include Varsoon because of his crumbing.

If evidence proves MB then everything changes.

The only one of those that is remotely acceptable is PV.

Wake1 · Post Post #3949 (ISO) » Tue Jul 12, 2016 7:20 am

In post 3948, Titus wrote:
In post 3947, Wake1 wrote:I'm willing to compromise on these lynches Day 2 thus far: Dunnstral, Boem, Titus, Almost50, Peregrine, Transcend.

Didn't include Varsoon because of his crumbing.

If evidence proves MB then everything changes.
The only one of those that is remotely acceptable is PV.

We'll have to agree to disagree then.