Mafiascum.net

In post 3926, Liger_Zero wrote:What if we lynched Max? That's a crazy thought.

In post 3916, Prince of Renais wrote:I think scum might still ignite.

In post 3928, Vedith wrote:

In post 3926, Liger_Zero wrote:What if we lynched Max? That's a crazy thought.

Why Max though?

In post 3927, Prince of Renais wrote:Shame on me for wanting to lynch the slot with the highest % of flipping scum???

In post 3930, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 3928, Vedith wrote:

In post 3926, Liger_Zero wrote:What if we lynched Max? That's a crazy thought.

Why Max though?

I made some reasons earlier. I don't have the energy to restate things.

In post 3929, Jingle wrote:

In post 3916, Prince of Renais wrote:I think scum might still ignite.

Optimal play is to not ignite until 1 doused player has been lynched.

In post 2907, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 2884, MaxwellPuckett wrote:VOTE: mcqueen
Theres two scum left and like 15 players alive so Im ready for the mislynch train

Which has nothing to do w the mcqueen vote fwiw

If someone is townreading him @me

@Rei Im gonna read piecemeal so waiting for me to be done probs wont work just do ur worst ill town it up or die

Is this because no one is hard townreading them?
Not getting this vote.

In post 2910, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 2908, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Idk whos townreading mcqueen thats why I asked
The vote is bc I think hes scummy

Why?

In post 3234, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 3029, MaxwellPuckett wrote:Like why am I here all scum Maxie shopping for reads when theres an entire thread of opinions i could grab for convenience
idk i feel like im pretty obvious trying to interact w people and talk abt their reads and your conclusions arent making any sense
@Liger

Because your opinions do look like they are being shopped so far? Not seeing much in terms of original thinking but I haven't been really reading your posts as of late so theres that.

In post 3359, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 3352, MaxwellPuckett wrote:

In post 3234, Liger_Zero wrote:Because your opinions do look like they are being shopped so far? Not seeing much in terms of original thinking but I haven't been really reading your posts as of late so theres that.

Are you reading my posts now Liger
I dont rly care if I get lynched bc the points against me are tbh fair
But if I had to pick a scum on me its Liger
Shit Dann said about me was yeah bad, Ligers doing it here too, not to mention the vote on me amidst other players being suspicious of me
Like he just kinda slides in there w the vote while RAS and Danna are going off

Yeah, I see that people are getting more suspicious of you and that theres growing interest in a wagon on you.

In post 3360, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 3353, MaxwellPuckett wrote:And like in terms of criticisms against me ive found Danns for example to be pretty valid
Meanwhile Ligers are that Im not showing original thinking which is wild when Im defending both Dolittle and Xtoxm as everyone runs around developing partner associations based on either of them being scum
So yeah i dont think hes reading my posts either

Like if you put any thought to it most of my opinions have been unpopular so idk how you get that theyre shopped from that
Dann was def me following the crowd on that vote but thats one thing among other things
The only player ive rly ingratiated myself to is Xtoxm and if I was shopping for opinions id probably... idk try that on someone a bunch of players arent trying to lynch
But the reason Im TRing xtoxm is mostly bc a) emotional reactions are shit he doesnt fake as scum (obvs scum is allowed to have emotions i HAVE considered that) and b) I read the game Ank was talking abt where xtoxm got mislynched like this
also c) Xtoxm was a bro he reminded me or a game we were in together and said "nice to see you again" and it felt good, sue me

I don't think defending xtoxm is all that unpopular as you are saying it is. Nor is dolittle.

In post 3930, Liger_Zero wrote:

In post 3928, Vedith wrote:

In post 3926, Liger_Zero wrote:What if we lynched Max? That's a crazy thought.

Why Max though?

I made some reasons earlier. I don't have the energy to restate things.

In post 3938, Liger_Zero wrote:Those posts of mine are very underwhelming. I am not gonna need to make a concise case on this if I want anyone agreeing with me. I am worried I will just be fabricating reasons if I do so though.

In post 3760, northsidegal wrote:

Votecount 3.7

Liger_Zero(5)

~ Reiuji Utsuho⁽⁸⁵⁾, MaxwellPuckett⁽⁶⁸⁾, Extrapolated Eagle⁽¹⁹⁷⁾, DrDolittle⁽⁹⁸⁾, Dannflor⁽⁹³⁾

Xtoxm(3)

~ mcqueen⁽²⁵⁾, Vedith⁽⁴⁹⁾, Prince of Renais⁽¹²⁸⁾

Vedith(1)

~ NerfedBuJ⁽³⁸⁾

Prince of Renais(1)

~ Xtoxm⁽⁴⁷⁾

NerfedBuJ(1)

~ Ankamius⁽¹⁴³⁾

MaxwellPuckett(1)

~ Liger_Zero⁽¹⁰⁶⁾

DrDolittle(1)

~ Jingle⁽⁹⁰⁾

Ankamius(1)

~ Karmeleon⁽⁸⁸⁾


Not Voting (1): RAS⁽⁴⁶⁾

With 15 alive it takes 8 to lynch.

Day 3 deadline is in (expired on 2019-04-05 16:49:59)

Searching for a replacement for Vedith.

In post 3942, Vedith wrote:

In post 3938, Liger_Zero wrote:Those posts of mine are very underwhelming. I am not gonna need to make a concise case on this if I want anyone agreeing with me. I am worried I will just be fabricating reasons if I do so though.

Okay, I don't really understand the reasoning behind it?
Is it more gut then?

In post 3934, Prince of Renais wrote:"how dare you try to lynch scum instead of information lynching"