Page 159 of 208
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 3:32 pm
by 1baldeagle1
In post 3949, pieguyn wrote:my point is that when you used vote freeze your intent was to stop voided from evading another lynch
however, when pressured, you said your intent was to show how much you wanted voided lynched, and said nothing about evading lynches
Isn't that kinda the same thing?
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 3:33 pm
by pieguyn
not really
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 3:34 pm
by 1baldeagle1
"I'm going to use to vote freezer ability to express my desire to lynch Voided because he has been evading so many lynches now"
See how the logic connects there?
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 3:51 pm
by pieguyn
no you explicitly said you were using it to stop him from evading another lynch
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:01 pm
by Voidedmafia
In post 3952, 1baldeagle1 wrote:"I'm going to use to vote freezer ability to express my desire to lynch Voided because he has been evading so many lynches now"
See how the logic connects there?
"And" is not "because"
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:40 pm
by 1baldeagle1
In post 3953, pieguyn wrote:no you explicitly said you were using it to stop him from evading another lynch
No, I was saying that there was more to the logic.
In post 3954, Voidedmafia wrote: In post 3952, 1baldeagle1 wrote:"I'm going to use to vote freezer ability to express my desire to lynch Voided because he has been evading so many lynches now"
See how the logic connects there?
"And" is not "because"
I had a strong desire because you escaped so many lynches. See how that works?
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 6:27 am
by Nero Cain
Continuing to catch up, gonna finish when I get home.
In post 3748, Voidedmafia wrote:In a sense, yes. Though, instead of undermining I want you to explain how mhork's
disconnect is scummy compared to Aces and BBmolla
because Aces did get lynched in part because he wasn't up to date with the game, and he flipped town, and BBmolla has admitted he is rather behind in this game beyond saying I'm scum and that Pie needs to die. And I'm not very keen on a scumread that has that as one of it's main reasons (based on what you said in that post regard mhork, anyways; if I'm putting too much emphasis on the impact there, please let me know).
Its A reason, not the reason. You need to explain the bolded 'cause I am p sure that you were pushing a Molla lynch at one point. Do you no longer find him scummy?
In post 3775, Lost Butterfly wrote:On that note, Voided, Nero, Espeonage, and ProHawk, who did you send money last night? And ProHawk, who did you send money on N3?
You.
tell me the importance of this question. I'll say more when you reply.
In post 3799, ProHawk wrote:For those of you with me on the scum-list, why am I not being pushed today?
scum want to mislynch me and then you. They only need 4 more dead townies.
In post 3828, Garuda wrote:Most people aren't scum reading him. Most people note the case on him is shit and it really hasn't felt like anyone has actually tried to determine his alignment, which screams lazy dumb lynch that won't hit scum.
like how does this not apply to me as well?
In post 3841, Garuda wrote:Especially in his posts today. What more has he done other than saying that he's here and he's still not going to post anything more of value?
I found Voided scum and Muffin scum. Why do you not want to lynch scum?
In post 3843, Garuda wrote:I remember last time Ilayed with Nero in a hydra in walking dead and he got into a fight with Thor it was a knock down drag out fight and
Nero was incredibly town
as a result. Or, his fight with CTD In Maniacal Mafia where CTD push on
Obvtown Nero
was the only reason I started considering him as scum in the first place.
This is pretty funny. I vaguely remember you voting for me in both games. Your "his attack on Muffin was weak" Is the same jazz I get every game though I'm still right about Muffin. Muffin didn't think there was any resistance to a Voided lynch...Voided is notMuffin scum and just brown nosing his biggest defender.
In post 3845, Garuda wrote:What do you think should be the plan for town going into the night tonight?
buy night kill so we have an extra day.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 6:40 am
by Garuda
In post 3910, Lost Butterfly wrote: In post 3905, Garuda wrote:Mina, I wish you could type things faster. I would love to stay and banter a while, but I need rest. I guess I'm gonna troll discussion forums for a while waiting for you and prepare to be intensely disappointed when I see my name as the last posted in this topic.
...okay, now I feel bad for being so tetchy in my last post.
If it makes you better, I
did
find your Nero post funny!
By the way, ask Empire about the game when I claimed an innocent on someone (and not a grey innocent like this one, a "THIS GUY IS CONFIRMED VT" one), and they decided to lynch him in LYLO anyway because he was posting less then the scumbag. You realize that if you lynch Nero and he's innocent, I'll have a streak?
<3
I'm sorry for nagging you, I'm just getting a little stressed myself because this game is going to hell in a handbasket even though it really, really shouldn't be.
My hope is that we lynch Nero and he's guilty so we can break your streak
. Luckily, I have more on Nero than "posting less than the scumbag", so we're already on the right track!
1. I liked upside down's reach out to me, and I think that the majority of his posting so far has been solid. I think Quilford's posts, while a bit out of left field and not at all plentiful, were pretty fucking town based on what I know about Quilford's scumgame (it's shit and doesn't leave him ballsy enough to say things like "posting too much is scummy"). This read has gone a bit stale because end of the game and all, but he's a horrible lynch when the main posting head is V/LA and all the cases against him being scum are weak.
2. Lazy town.
In post 3917, Voidedmafia wrote:...you also said that you're waiting for LB to refute mhork's post.
Nacho, are you drunk from Thanksgiving?
Jokes, Voided. Jokes.
In post 3939, Ghostly Penguin wrote:even if he has investigation immunity contrary to my read on him, given that it's apparently 4-shot we're better off scum hunting elsewhere.
I don't understand.
Because people
are
scumreading you and people
are
trying to sort your alignment.
I do want to lynch scum. One of those people is one of my strongest townreads, and the other I'm doubting pretty hard.
In post 3956, Nero Cain wrote:This is pretty funny. I vaguely remember you voting for me in both games. Your "his attack on Muffin was weak" Is the same jazz I get every game though I'm still right about Muffin. Muffin didn't think there was any resistance to a Voided lynch...Voided is notMuffin scum and just brown nosing his biggest defender.
You won't remember me voting for you after you towned it up. I don't understand the resistance point.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 6:42 am
by Garuda
In post 3926, Lost Butterfly wrote:What I'm thinking now is something like "everyone sends $50 to one of three or four players." This way, the money is still not concentrated all in one basket, and it's less predictable as to who has what roles. BUT the townier players have more buying power. (But the problem with this is that it doesn't keep scum poor. We could get around it by having a tier of top suspects we want to keep completely bankrupt.)
I think the plan should be something like "everyone sends all massclaim to one of three or four (max) players". We're looking for a hail mary play today, and we need a plan that will allow us to buy the nightkill tomorrow; getting townreads a decent amount of money is cool and all, but it's not going to cut it.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 6:54 am
by zMuffinMan
ghosty wrote:even if he has investigation immunity contrary to my read on him, given that it's apparently 4-shot we're better off scum hunting elsewhere
no. just no.
i mean, fine, there are scum other than nero in this game, but leaving nero because of a cop inno in a game where we know scum has investigation immunity and nero is very likely scum is nonsensical.
fuck that. he's scum. lynch him today.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 7:06 am
by zMuffinMan
nero wrote: In post 3828, Garuda wrote:Most people aren't scum reading him. Most people note the case on him is shit and it really hasn't felt like anyone has actually tried to determine his alignment, which screams lazy dumb lynch that won't hit scum.
like how does this not apply to me as well?
... how do you think it
does
apply to you? quite literally every part of that paragraph does not apply to you this game.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:03 am
by Harakiri
Post.
Nat is on V/LA and I've had a cold which hasn't really motivated me on reading this, so posting to avoid a prod.
~Sakura Hana
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 9:28 am
by Lord Mhork
I still maintain baldeagle is print own. So is muffin. Nero is still scum.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 10:36 am
by pieguyn
@Lost Butterfly:
all my money adds up then. I received a weird amount on N4, but KA was the only one who transferred to me N3 and he flipped town already so it doesn't matter
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 1:08 pm
by 1baldeagle1
Wait, wait, wait. Doesn't scum have two night kills? There was no kill on Night 1, but nobody claimed having night kill on Day 1, so that means they were stacking it up. So, technically, they have 2.
So, there's 9 town and 5 scum, we lynch town today, scum kills twice and wins night kill, so at the start of Day 6, there's 6 town and 5 scum and that's LYLO....
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 1:14 pm
by Harakiri
In post 3964, 1baldeagle1 wrote:Wait, wait, wait. Doesn't scum have two night kills? There was no kill on Night 1, but nobody claimed having night kill on Day 1, so that means they were stacking it up. So, technically, they have 2.
So, there's 9 town and 5 scum, we lynch town today, scum kills twice and wins night kill, so at the start of Day 6, there's 6 town and 5 scum and that's LYLO....
Or they hit scum with their night kill
~Sakura Hana
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 1:17 pm
by Voidedmafia
I think it'd be best to assume that they stacked their NKs N1 over your idea for the time being until we know where that particular one is.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 1:18 pm
by 1baldeagle1
In post 3966, Voidedmafia wrote:
I think it'd be best to assume that they stacked their NKs N1 over your idea for the time being until we know where that particular one is.
Yeah, it's better to be aware of this if we start to get closer to scum's numbers.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 1:19 pm
by 1baldeagle1
So, really, if we can just have one of the top townreads win night kill tonight, I think that will buy us an extra day.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 2:21 pm
by N
We're still having trouble logging into the Hydra, but Magua wants us to post anyway. I'm gonna make this quick because my phone's battery is low.
We hatched aplan with pv to get messenger so as to stop scum getting it. Iwanted to use it to pretend to be scum looking for the other team, but both pv and quilford thought that was a bad idea so we haven't used it yet.
Speaking of unused abilities, i am uncomfortable with vpidef still having double vote this close to Kylie, especially if he's scum and his team now has asecond double vote.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 2:23 pm
by Voidedmafia
In post 3969, N wrote:Speaking of unused abilities, i am uncomfortable with vpidef still having double vote this close to Kylie, especially if he's scum and his team now has asecond double vote.
I SAID THIS FOUR FUCKING TIMES, I DON'T HAVE EV ANYMORE!
God, do I have to yell like Fate to get this through your skull?
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 2:31 pm
by Quilford
N, buddy, drop out and enjoy your holidaying. I'm catching up.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 2:57 pm
by Lost Butterfly
In post 3970, Voidedmafia wrote: In post 3969, N wrote:Speaking of unused abilities, i am uncomfortable with vpidef still having double vote this close to Kylie, especially if he's scum and his team now has asecond double vote.
I SAID THIS FOUR FUCKING TIMES, I DON'T HAVE EV ANYMORE!
God, do I have to yell like Fate to get this through your skull?
Did Magua tell you this at the beginning of the day?
In post 3936, zMuffinMan wrote:lb 3929 wrote:Part burden of proficiency
wat. if nero is scum, then that pretty much means i've been pushing for scum lynches since D2, no?
I misused "burden of proficiency." What worries me is your proficiency as
scum
, not as town. Admittedly, you being right about Nero (whose last couple of posts are absolutely atrocious) would be a point in your favour (because you're obviously not on the same faction as him
if you were, your QuickTopic will be hilarious to read
, and I don't see scum going full-throttle on someone they have conviction is guilty in this set-up).
Nacho, I assume Muffin is the player you're worried about and not Voided? Can you explain what it is that's tripping your bells?
More coming if I don't fall asleep first.
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 2:58 pm
by Quilford
VOTE: BBmolla
scum found, big time
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2013 2:58 pm
by Lost Butterfly
Do you think it's fair to say that you're coasting today, Mhork?