Mafiascum.net

In post 3874, inspectorscout wrote:Statistically speaking

In post 3947, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3944, mhsmith0 wrote:I will say I'm curious where the dunn-pie back and forth goes, and am willing to potentially reconsider my stance if I see good evidence to do so. But I'm certainly not there at this point in time.

What compelled you to say this out loud?

You understand how this could change the course of events, right?

In post 3948, pieguyn wrote:

In post 3942, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 2872, Dunnstral wrote:I'll lay out some information for the rest of the.... well for you guys

HS-Parma pair won't push (and barely interact) with the mhsmith-pieguyn pairing

And they both hard pushing Shadow

Relevant

Dunn/Parama... hmmm

In post 3938, inspectorscout wrote:

In post 3935, mhsmith0 wrote:

In post 3932, inspectorscout wrote:I think i said the whole post sounded fake.
Also, surprise: i scumread mds the whole game. Ask her. I didnt flip because of 1 post, i just had more trust in it. I do think her frustration afterwards is genuine, tjough.

Do you scumread me? Dont you have any patience? Do you feel the need to vote me?

If I felt the need to vote you I'd be voting. You're much more of a null for me rn, and I feel like other flips would be more hepful in terms of evaluating you.

I think we've had more than enough interactions for you to sort me. If pie isn't satisfied with my reads because they are based on agression and careless posting, why should you have a null-read on a rather active poster who has had multiple interactions with you and with others without her making a problem over it?

Isnt that cherrypicking from her side? When dunn calls her out on that, she throws out a scumread on him. Is that townie?

In post 3942, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 2872, Dunnstral wrote:I'll lay out some information for the rest of the.... well for you guys

HS-Parma pair won't push (and barely interact) with the mhsmith-pieguyn pairing

And they both hard pushing Shadow

Relevant

In post 3951, mhsmith0 wrote:

In post 3947, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3944, mhsmith0 wrote:I will say I'm curious where the dunn-pie back and forth goes, and am willing to potentially reconsider my stance if I see good evidence to do so. But I'm certainly not there at this point in time.

What compelled you to say this out loud?

You understand how this could change the course of events, right?

Huh? How could "I'm not there at this time, but am willing to see where it goes" materially change the course of events?

In post 3937, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3918, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3902, pieguyn wrote:

In post 3898, inspectorscout wrote:I do think parama's agression and just posting whatever is on her mind is townie, although i kind of dislike her case on arthur.

"aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" aren't good reasons to seriously town read someone at this point in the game.

Alright. Why should people be town reading you at this point in the game?
After all, isn't "aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" your game so far?


Follow-up question: Who's townreading you, and what's your opinion on them

If you're town it would do you good to seriously evaluate this, because by your own logic the people town reading you should be scum.

Yet you're acting contrary to that

In post 3955, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3951, mhsmith0 wrote:

In post 3947, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3944, mhsmith0 wrote:I will say I'm curious where the dunn-pie back and forth goes, and am willing to potentially reconsider my stance if I see good evidence to do so. But I'm certainly not there at this point in time.

What compelled you to say this out loud?

You understand how this could change the course of events, right?

Huh? How could "I'm not there at this time, but am willing to see where it goes" materially change the course of events?

Curious that you changed what you actually said, even if the meaning is similar.

If you're thinking one of us is scum (as you said you did) why do you try to almost influence things/posture like that?

In post 3957, Dunnstral wrote:Mhsmith if pieguy doesn't answer I want your thoughts on what I said there ^

mhsmith0 wrote:

In post 3955, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3951, mhsmith0 wrote:

In post 3947, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3944, mhsmith0 wrote:I will say I'm curious where the dunn-pie back and forth goes, and am willing to potentially reconsider my stance if I see good evidence to do so. But I'm certainly not there at this point in time.

What compelled you to say this out loud?

You understand how this could change the course of events, right?

Huh? How could "I'm not there at this time, but am willing to see where it goes" materially change the course of events?

Curious that you changed what you actually said, even if the meaning is similar.

If you're thinking one of us is scum (as you said you did) why do you try to almost influence things/posture like that?

So your issue with what I said is that I didn't really agree w you, and that was somehow going to materially influence things?

I mean, I guess i can see your point about my having responded to the wrong thing, but I still don't see how the (unedited) part had the potential to make a meaningful influence. Like, how exactly does it substantially change anything for me to be expressing a currently skeptical viewpoint?

You were acting like it was important, but I don't understand how it could have been.

In post 3963, mhsmith0 wrote:"But I'm certainly not there at this point in time." Wasn't my own thoughts? Especially on the back of my already stated town!pie reasoning?

In post 3962, pieguyn wrote:like the thing with this is neither Dunn _or_ Parama feel worried to me at all.

I might just be reading too much into it, but if Jester is town, scum would know that I'd likely lose most of my credibility after his flip.

In post 3962, pieguyn wrote:like the thing with this is neither Dunn _or_ Parama feel worried to me at all.

I might just be reading too much into it, but if Jester is town, scum would know that I'd likely lose most of my credibility after his flip.

In post 3966, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3963, mhsmith0 wrote:"But I'm certainly not there at this point in time." Wasn't my own thoughts? Especially on the back of my already stated town!pie reasoning?

Your "thought" was that you didn't have an opinion at the moment

Not really the point I was getting at either

In post 3964, Parama wrote:so about all i've gotten from dunn's iso:
"might be scum with kagami because hs was awkward discussing kagami once (but i'm not gonna say where)"
"hs is reaching (but i'm not gonna say where)"
"hs barely interacted with pie (i don't think this is true)"
"responding to questions = defensiveness"
"weak omgus accusation in 3403"

definitely doesn't look like "in detail" to me and i'm not sure what your strong points against HS are even supposed to be, as scattered and unsubstantiated as they are

In post 3961, Dunnstral wrote:"It could have influenced the way I acted"

Seems pretty careless of a thing for you to say as town. It reads more as posturing to show other people you're considering something.

In post 3954, Parama wrote: gave my thoughts on pie/smith near the end of first dance, pie is pretty town and i don't particularly feel mhsmith is scum either

In post 3937, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3918, Dunnstral wrote:

In post 3902, pieguyn wrote:

In post 3898, inspectorscout wrote:I do think parama's agression and just posting whatever is on her mind is townie, although i kind of dislike her case on arthur.

"aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" aren't good reasons to seriously town read someone at this point in the game.

Alright. Why should people be town reading you at this point in the game?
After all, isn't "aggression" and "posting whatever is on their mind" your game so far?


Follow-up question: Who's townreading you, and what's your opinion on them

If you're town it would do you good to seriously evaluate this, because by your own logic the people town reading you should be scum.

Yet you're acting contrary to that

In post 3972, Parama wrote:

In post 3954, Parama wrote: gave my thoughts on pie/smith near the end of first dance, pie is pretty town and i don't particularly feel mhsmith is scum either