Mafiascum.net

time to put your money where your mouth is, oka.

Oka just make sure the night actions are sorted out before you hammer.

okay now its dany - nsg,pp,alch,ss

nsg - comical, auro, dany

dany is at l2?

ah, you're right.

i think the gameplan is to stack night actions on nsg

nsg clearly didn't want to be gunsmith'd earlier but the nsg problem won't go away anytime soon

Oh man why is schadd underscore not awake 24/7 for our moderation needs.

I'm willing to switch to whatever wagon in my lynchpool happens.

We have like 36 hours though right? So this isn't urgent.

actually wait

boon should check nsg

nero/nsg has some equity

so does alch/nero augh

In post 3955, OkaPoka wrote:nsg clearly didn't want to be gunsmith'd earlier but the nsg problem won't go away anytime soon

Oka, is the "NSG problem"? You keep refusing to answer me and it's starting to get a little bit bothersome. I think that I deserve the basic respect of an answer, especially from someone willing to lynch me despite saying that they have no reasons to scumread me.

Like, is this what RC feels like? Why am I of all people being treated this way?

Well Boon/Nero/Luna/PP should all stack on somebody.

I believe Auro is the best target.

the NSG problem is where you will always be scumread by a sizable enough part of the playerlist to be a viable lynch wagon

i dont understand why you don't think thats evident

you should want a clear otherwise tomorrow we just repeat a wagon onto you today

and nsg i have no reasons to scumread you

but i also have no reason to townread you other than meta

meta that is ridiculously easy to break and anybody who rolls scum would salivate to have a meta like that

Does that include yourself? Besides, comical has already come up with his excuse in advance – according to him, I'm the mafia doctor. A clear on me will do nothing to stop him.

Assume that I am town. How much of the wagon on me do you believe is scum-motivated? Does that alter your thinking in any way?



All of that aside, I still find that reasoning silly. If you see no reason to scumread someone then the fact that other people do (for poor and ill-defined reasons) does not, I think, justify going "welp, guess we should just kill 'em now".

In post 3924, OkaPoka wrote:

luna, pp, nero target idany tonight
boon checks S_S
i will jail someone

I’ll probably pick on my own randomly to wifom

i think exactly auro and idany are scum if you are town

a clear on you is enough reassurance for me not to sheep boon

Yeah, I’m not moving off of NSG until she’s dead all game tbh

Right, mafia doctor is a thing that exists.

If only there were some way to verify that someone wasn't a mafia doctor.

In post 3965, OkaPoka wrote:and nsg i have no reasons to scumread you

but i also have no reason to townread you other than meta

meta that is ridiculously easy to break and anybody who rolls scum would salivate to have a meta like that

If it was that easy to break it would have been broken before this game. This point has been brought up before.

In post 3965, OkaPoka wrote:and nsg i have no reasons to scumread you

but i also have no reason to townread you other than meta

meta that is ridiculously easy to break and anybody who rolls scum would salivate to have a meta like that

Oh, please. Must we really go through this again?

This game isn't about possibilities. It's about probabilities. What is the most likely scenario, and why.



The only way I can reconcile you believing that I can play so far removed from my scumgame is if you believe that before this point I have been trust-telling and deliberately gimping my scumgame. I know that some people do think this.

Is that what you think?

Even on a no gun

Nero and I should not be on the same person ever