Posted: Sun May 02, 2021 10:32 am
uhhh lol \
We still have enough time to go over things here.In post 3970, clidd wrote:@Lemon
Assuming that your elimination occurs today, do you have final reads?
I think I agree with.this. but I'm probably just bias in the fact that I think there's 1 active claim and 1 used claim in the PRs as scum anyway.In post 3945, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:what do you think?
The traitor can still have a RB power. So it doesn't set Dk in stone but this is actually a very good point that I over looked.In post 3960, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:also if Lemons flips as something like scum rolecop then we know we dont have a scum roleblocker and koba is guranteed lying
Thats fine, I'm not looking for justification here really. It's mainly the top name I'm interested but the rest helps.In post 3967, InsidiousLemons wrote:VFP, andres, osuka, anya, pooky
keep in mind though i don't believe there's more than one scum in here to begin with, so it's a bit misleading to put them in a linear order since everyone after VFP is at least a townlean. i wrote out my reasons so i have them on standby when you want 'em. i assume you don't want them yet because you don't want some of us piggybacking off of others, which i guess makes sense
Of course they can be, I just don't see both scum calling out late like that as scum.In post 3968, Asteria wrote:Can you explain again why clidd and lemons can't be a pair?
You have a mistake in my pairing. I think DK is town because of mech. I think the scum are clidd and lemons. That's why I'm interested in the above. If I'm wrong then it's clidd and DK
Osuka, Anya, Andre, Pooky, VFP
this makes up the bulk of my case. clidd seems like a player who knows what he's doing, and i don't think people should judge the boldness of his claim to be as town-indicative as they do. the last thing i want to say is that clidd's interactions with asteria from 153-155 read as distancing to me. i think scum!cliddIn post 3776, InsidiousLemons wrote:there's almost nothing to go off of D2 (i.e., after she would have checked you [editor's note: pooky]), but does 2489 really strike you as possible from a salsa whoknowsyou didn't kill anyone the previous night? and does a salsa with this partially-absolving information on you, who was suspicious enough of you on D1 to emphatically state "you're scum!" (1524), withhold it the next day? it's almost unthinkable. i could see a universe where clidd skimmed salsa's iso for a player she pushed D1 and decided to claim something modest based off of that. the meagre nature of the claim, the safety of claiming an innocent result on an already-conftown player, and the perceived boldness/foolishness of this claim coming from scum could easily be enough to convince clidd to make this play.
So scum decide to push each others wagons (as the second votes) without attempting for a different wagon in the PRs?In post 3979, InsidiousLemons wrote:asteria plus clidd is absolutely an acceptable combination to me and i find it strange that VFP doesn't seem to agree.
you have dk paired with 3 other possible scum. doesn't that make it the worst elimination in terms of information gain, since the entropy is only minimally decreased? if you have a lemons flip, for example, then your pool is smaller than it would be if you had a koba flip. how did you get to this point in your thought process?In post 3938, VFP wrote:As a whole Dk feels like the right option here as they are linked 3 of 4 to be scum.
asteria and clidd
scumpostingIn post 3944, clidd wrote:Oh, and just to contextualize my activity level, I can vary a lot in the sense of effort from game to game. It's conscious.
Not that I necessarily get tired, but I like to approach games in different ways. It isn't AI.
elaborateIn post 3990, clidd wrote:I think that Lemon's wallpost was potentially emulated from an informed perspective that tried to show itself as uninformed. I don't sympathize with the thought process.