Page 17 of 21

Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2004 5:54 pm
by inHimshallibe
You have to understand, Greg T, that I posted the above mentioned unaware that there existed ONLY generic evil robots. I think we all made the assumption at one point or another that there were some good guy active roles.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 5:42 am
by Quagmire
1 - inHimshallibe [Greg T]
1 - Greg T [CoolBot]

4 to lynch.

POST! I'm going to prod some people if they don't start posting.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 5:43 am
by Cubsfan4life
Vote: Greg T
we need some pressure on someone and he's my best bet.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:53 am
by Greg T
I don't see why I should get your vote. I successfully defended myself against CoolBot, and provided evidence for my case against inHimshallibe.

inHimshallibe: I agree that at the beginning we all probably made the assumption that there were other pro-town roles besides generic evil robots. However, by the end of day four, multiple people had claimed generic evil robot, and four people had died, and some were in both categories. You should have figured out what was going on.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 8:40 am
by CoolBot
Successful how? You certainly didn't convince me, Greg T. Just because you have an excuse doesn't mean it's particularly believable.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:41 pm
by inHimshallibe
GregT wrote: However, by the end of day four, multiple people had claimed generic evil robot, and four people had died, and some were in both categories.
Just for my sake, GregT, would you care to explain the "categories" bit? I'm not sure what you mean.

Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2004 7:44 pm
by inHimshallibe
OH... I see it now. :oops:

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 9:03 am
by Greg T
CoolBot wrote:Successful how? You certainly didn't convince me, Greg T. Just because you have an excuse doesn't mean it's particularly believable.
From what I understand, you were voting me because I was using "craplogic", and had realized that my "craplogic" was easily revealed by your response to my "craplogic". However, I pointed out that I had given a response similar to yours before you did, and thus it was clear that your response came as no surprise to me.

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 11:40 am
by CoolBot
Greg T wrote: you were voting me because I was using "craplogic", and had realized that my "craplogic" was easily revealed by your response to my "craplogic"
My response did not reveal your crap logic; your post attacking me for something CoolBot(I) did was enough to reveal it. Unless you can give me a compelling reason to believe scum would give a materially different response than I did, I have no choice but to believe that you were just trying to protect your fellow scum, rite, by trying to manufacture a bandwagon on dubious grounds.

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 3:26 pm
by rolandofthewhite
I have a random thought to throw in, I guess.

I noticed that when AniX was on the chopping block, he had enough votes where the Mafia could have simply jumped in very quickly and voted for him, ending the game right there. However, since they clearly had the chance but did not take it, it makes me wonder if AniX was indeed Mafia, and they were hesitant in lynching a fellow Mafia member. This might be totally off, but it just made me wonder.

FOS: CoolBot
, not for anything he has done, but for the actions (or lack of, rather :? ) surrounding AniX.

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 6:31 pm
by Greg T
CoolBot wrote:My response did not reveal your crap logic; your post attacking me for something CoolBot(I) did was enough to reveal it. Unless you can give me a compelling reason to believe scum would give a materially different response than I did, I have no choice but to believe that you were just trying to protect your fellow scum, rite, by trying to manufacture a bandwagon on dubious grounds.
If you were to come back in a game in which you were previously a pro-town inspector, would you want to reveal to everyone the results of your previous inspections? The answer would depend on your new alignment. Even though this example is taken to the extreme and probably isn't realistic, the logic applies here. I don't know specifically why you might have given a different response depending on alignment, however it was conceivable that you might have.

Posted: Sun Nov 21, 2004 11:28 pm
by lulu muumuu
i agree with rolands statement that if mafia could have easily finished off aniX if he were a townie. that is why i voted for him. however, this might only be the case if we were down to "lynch right or lose" since, i would think, mafia wouldn't let themselves stick out so much as to obviously quick lynch a townie.

at the same time, i still think it's strange that if it were the case that we're down to a lynch right or lose situation that the mafia didn't go for the quick kill.

fos: coolbot.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 3:47 am
by CoolBot
[quote="Greg T']Even though this example is taken to the extreme and probably isn't realistic, the logic applies here.[/quote]
Yeah, it isn't realistic. I wasn't a cop nor did I claim to be one. In fact, people with roles are rarely brought back to replace someone, and if they are, they're strictly forbidden to use info from the previous incarnation.

BTW, rite was voting AniX when he had the most votes. Other scum was likely, too. How could they add votes when they were already voting him?

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 6:53 am
by inHimshallibe
So we go back to a voting snapshot of the Day, right before Coolbot replaced. I'll bring it up in an hour or two, if no one else does. (Read as : in class right now.)

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 9:29 am
by CoolBot
What are you talking about? The time AniX was in most danger of being lynched wasn't when I replaced him, but when he had four votes on him:
Quagmire wrote:4 - AniX [Greg T, lulu muumuu, rite, lulu muumuu]
1 - rolandofthewhite [Cubsfan4life]

5 to lynch.

AniX has been prodded again, but if he doesn't post by the end of Monday, he will get replaced.
And the extra lulu appears to be roland. This is when scum had the most chance of throwing on an extra vote. It clearly didn't happen, but so what? Quagmire clearly indicated his intentions to replace AniX, so any extra votes would look pretty suspicous.

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:11 am
by inHimshallibe
That is the vote count I was meaning. I think we might be able to use this to our advantage, somehow.

If only I knew for sure how PB does that stuff. . .

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:38 am
by Cubsfan4life
A) There's no evidence we were in lynch or lose yesterday. While I agreed with the cautious play just incase I do not believe for sure we lose if we lynch wrong yesterday, there's yet to be a kill.

B) If we were in a lynch or lose situation it's very possible that scum already were on that bandwagon.

C) What does everybody think about that "second understudy" thing attached to Rite?

Posted: Mon Nov 22, 2004 10:48 am
by CoolBot
Cubsfan4life wrote:C) What does everybody think about that "second understudy" thing attached to Rite?
I think it just refers to the fact that there were three Mega Mans. The extras were just first & second understudy, ready to take his spot if the real one dies.

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 7:21 am
by CoolBot
I'll be away until Sunday. Perhaps someone will feel fit to post something before then.

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 7:24 am
by Altimaga
Like Coolbot said, the understudy thing is most likely similar to cop and deputy.

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:41 pm
by rolandofthewhite
Whoa... Altimaga said something. :shock:

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 1:48 pm
by Altimaga
Whoa... Rolando can read!

Posted: Wed Nov 24, 2004 2:06 pm
by rolandofthewhite
Hehe. :lol:

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:57 am
by Quagmire
1 - inHimshallibe [Greg T]
2 - Greg T [CoolBot, Cubsfan4life]

4 to lynch.

DEADLINE SET FOR SUNDAY AT 9:00 PM CENTRAL (-6 HRS GMT).

IF POSTING PICKS UP, THIS CAN BE EXTENDED.

Posted: Fri Nov 26, 2004 12:17 pm
by rolandofthewhite
Well, it seems to me that the Mafia are incapable of killing. They haven't killed a once yet.

I would vote No Lynch, but we're not allowed. :(