Posted: Tue Aug 31, 2010 6:14 am
uh, people usually DO need to explain themselves to be accepted as correct.
what's this related to? it's certainly not an explanation for why it's scummy, so I'm not sure what the point is.zwetschenwasser wrote:uh, people usually DO need to explain themselves to be accepted as correct.
Because those that say he's town are only saying that and not giving reasoning behind it?Faraday wrote:TL is your scumdar really bad or are you scum here?
Someone's going to need to explain just why 389 is scummy, like in any way. (it's not, but I look forward to people trying to paint it as such)
The Friend wagon's incredibly bad, actually, unbelievable really. Idk why the fuck people can't see that Friend is town.
hahah. Wow, that's an amazingly terrible excuse.Furcolow wrote:Just drop the attitude. You are inhibiting me from having any sort of posting quality whatsoever.
Lol. Man, this guy is entertaining.Furcolow wrote:ok. i'm going to step out for a second. i am town/townie, just trust me on this.
You know, it would be hillarious if, before this game, Furclaw was told by his scum buddy "Hey, I've got an idea; how about you act like the most absurdly bad VI ever, then no one will think you're scum".Furcolow wrote:holster
you all want me to claim yet?
That is what I was asking. If the brothers work like cult recruiter(s), and no one else is going to be recruited if they get lynched, then we need to find and lynch them first, yes; in fact, I said that in the very post you just quoted. Not all cults work like that though, and since Vezo was claiming to have inside knowledge about how the cult works, I thought I would ask.TheLonging wrote:
I'd rather we look for the brothers first so we don't have to deal with finding the recruits later. Also lynching plausible recruits are dumb. That's not actual hunting for scum (I just realize you probably meant look for people who are already recruited to lynch. Still dumb, as that's not fixing the roof leak, but rather, putting a few band-aids on it and calling it a night until the next morning when the mafia will just take those band-aids off).
(slaps forehead)Furcolow wrote:So if I'm a townie, I should say I'm a power role, and if I'm a power role, I should say I'm a townie
Um, Porochaz is a pretty good player. Just based on all your posts this game, you are not. We don't need anyone else to "get on your level", trust me on this.Furcolow wrote: I don't need to "get better", players like you need to get on my level
Furcolow wrote:this one?Furcolow wrote:I am a power role
stop voting me please
You know, up until these two posts, i was on the "Furcolow is a VI who's probably town" side of the fence. These two posts, though, where he's basically combining "don't vote for me, I'm a power role" scare tactics with "I'm probably lying, so I get to claim whatever I want later" BS scummy WIFOM stuff is really making me suspect him, and tempting me to at least wagon him to force a real claim instead of all this scummy-as-hell-BS.Furcolow wrote:or this one?Furcolow wrote:So if I'm a townie, I should say I'm a power role, and if I'm a power role, I should say I'm a townie
Urge to lynch, rising...Furcolow wrote:I'd prefer to lynch a lurker than a liar if the liar is lying like I'm lying
No its not. Saying whos scum and town is useless posturing. It doesn't give the town anything, at the very least its a very anti-town way to play. Giving reasons is what pushes the town forward and separates us from other sites where lynches start being random. Making cases, working out who is scum and town by analysis helps us work out who to vote and should influence who we should vote or not vote. By cutting that out we are no longer playing a game of skill and we start playing a game of luck.Faraday wrote:388 doesn't doa lot for me. I think it's pretty unfair to say he's provided no content, I think saying X is town or Y is scum is content. It's the main thing that matters really. IDK the whole thing seems to be you disagreeing with the way he plays.
Porochaz wrote:No its not. Saying whos scum and town is useless posturing. It doesn't give the town anything, at the very least its a very anti-town way to play. Giving reasons is what pushes the town forward and separates us from other sites where lynches start being random. Making cases, working out who is scum and town by analysis helps us work out who to vote and should influence who we should vote or not vote. By cutting that out we are no longer playing a game of skill and we start playing a game of luck.Faraday wrote:388 doesn't doa lot for me. I think it's pretty unfair to say he's provided no content, I think saying X is town or Y is scum is content. It's the main thing that matters really. IDK the whole thing seems to be you disagreeing with the way he plays.
See this is just pure playstyle disagreement and probably belongs in MD. Your idea of anti-town =/= scummy.Porochaz wrote:No its not. Saying whos scum and town is useless posturing. It doesn't give the town anything, at the very least its a very anti-town way to play. Giving reasons is what pushes the town forward and separates us from other sites where lynches start being random. Making cases, working out who is scum and town by analysis helps us work out who to vote and should influence who we should vote or not vote. By cutting that out we are no longer playing a game of skill and we start playing a game of luck.Faraday wrote:388 doesn't doa lot for me. I think it's pretty unfair to say he's provided no content, I think saying X is town or Y is scum is content. It's the main thing that matters really. IDK the whole thing seems to be you disagreeing with the way he plays.