Mafiascum.net

Gollum wrote:

I'm thinking this game has Bowser, Meta Knight, Wario, Ganondorf, Waluigi (I think he was playable) and whoever else is a baddie that I can't think of right now. Are there enough bad guys for multiple mafia teams or only one team? - with my limited memory, I'm only thinking about one team. Getting back to my point, if there's a lot of bad guys in SSB, then I still have my hand raised since there's a higher probability/possibility/chance/etc that a scummy player will flip scum.

Also, I don't like this.
And anyone that pushes the thought that "bad guys" in SSB = scum, should be sentenced to death without trial.

[FRIEND]

I take a long time typing my posts. And I'm lazy and click submit cause I want to get my post out there. What's your point?

PEDIT OMG: I agree with SocioPath.

Just askin'

Something is not right.
I agree with socio and pika too.
Mass name claim NOW.
Diddin first.

^No.

xVEZOKENERx wrote:Something is not right.
I agree with socio and pika too.
Mass name claim NOW.
Diddin first.

If you agree with Socio, then why do you ask for a mass name claim? He's saying names don't have anything to do with alignment. It's completely useless.

Also, can you guys find a way to differentiate between your two heads?

Also, that was [FRIEND].

Pikachu wrote:

xVEZOKENERx wrote:Something is not right.
I agree with socio and pika too.
Mass name claim NOW.
Diddin first.

If you agree with Socio, then why do you ask for a mass name claim? He's saying names don't have anything to do with alignment. It's completely useless.

Exactly.
If
BAD GUYS = SCUM
Then
LOOK AT PLAYER COUNT.
28 peoples running around...
hmm...guess what...scum don't have fake claims.
DERP DERP.
Name claim = useless.

[FRIEND]

Exactly, just from a modding standpoint, making the "bad guys" scum is completely game-breaking since I also doubt there's any fakeclaims.

xVEZOKENERx wrote:Something is not right.
I agree with socio and pika too.
Mass name claim NOW.
Diddin first.

The more you talk the less it seems that you are town. Can you start attempting to do a little bit of scumhunting, you really haven't done anything or provided anything in any of your posts that would be considered helpful. The quote above is the closest you have come to scumhunting, and that isn't even close.

I've already defended my actions as good as I can. The rest of the people on my wagon are just assuming I was lying about my gambit when I wasn't. Nothing I can really do for that that I already haven't.


I'm voting kirbyoshi, I'm just not townvoting anybody right now.

[FRIEND]

WHAT ABOUT FATE'S VOTE

diddin wrote:Honestly right now the wagon on me is terrible, half the people on it haven't even contributed original reasoning and just sheeped. People like VEZOKENER are likely scum who are trying to blend in by voting the leading wagon.

manho wrote:

diddin wrote:I self-townvoted as a gambit to end RVS early and generate discussion.

It's not harming anybody now and I'm too lazy to un-townvote so I'll keep it where it is.

it is really scummy. i don't believe in any RVS-ending gambit. and after re-reading the original post, i really don't think it was an intentional gambit, so diddin is lying and should be lynched.

Pure WIFOM and what about it makes you think i'm lying?

Kocc42 wrote:@Diddin: I had to read through a lot of pages and reading quickly, I didn't see what was different between the 2 plays, after it was explained however I understood. Fate has a high expectation to meet and asked for the immunity and kill. You proposed a pointless strategy of everyone only self voting and now you claim it was just to make things take a serious turn. But if you hadn't been called out for it would you have continued, under the guise that you're just a cautious townie?

Also pointless WIFOM and never even explains why it's scummy. He sounds like I planned on having everyone self-townvote forever, which I wasn't.

Zaziesurio wrote:

Y'know, I just read diddin's iso, and I don't buy it.

unlynch vote: Mongoose
lynch vote: diddin

Still don't like Mongoose, though.

Wagonvote with no reasoning given.

xVEZOKENERx wrote:Let's lynch diddin then.

unvote
Vote diddin

Bandwagon vote for no reason.

So my wagon is pretty much screaming scumdriven right now over WFOM and RVS gambits.

^You didn't mention Kirby here. He isn't voting you, also. Do you still find him scummier than your "scum-driven" bandwagon?

^Rhetorical question. More diddn votes.

Pikachu wrote:[FRIEND]

WHAT ABOUT FATE'S VOTE

What about Nachomamma's+???(I'm sure there's at least one more)? You seem to have a fixation with wanting him to comment on my vote in particular, what about the rest of the wagon?

Sitback and let me interrogate diddin, Friend.

Pikachu wrote:[FRIEND]

WHAT ABOUT FATE'S VOTE

While it's true I haven't commented too much on other wagons, I've been defending myself so much I haven't really had time. I don't know why but I haven't really gotten into this game too much. I can say I like Pikachu's case on Kirby a lot and he's my current choice for lynch.

also, . IMO he's been more town than Fate but I wouldn't be against fate getting a smash ball.

Nacho's vote was before I said that the apparent contradiction with Kirby was due to me taking it out of context. Ever since that he hasn't said a word about me, so it's hard to tell what he thinks now.

MehPlusRawr (3): Bunnylover, seth, Furry
Kirbyoshi (7): frayed, MafiaSSK, I doubt it, Chronopie, diddin, tanstalas
mongoose (1): Kirbyoshi
MafiaSSK (1): SocioPath
Brain Hollywood (1): Gollum
seth (4): gandalf5166, mongoose, MehPlusRawr, seth
diddin (8): Nachomamma8, Switz, manho, Kocc42, zaziesurio, xVEZOKNERx, Fate, Pikachu
Switz (1): PaltryExcuse
xVEZOKNERx (1): Framm 18

Not voting (2): Everyone else

With 28 alive it's 15 to lynch!



MehPlusRawr (1): MehPlusRawr
mongoose (1): mongoose
Pikachu (1): Bunnylover
Framm 18 (1): MafiaSSK
Furry (2): frayed, diddin
Fate (13): Fate, Nachomamma8, Kirbyoshi, Chronopie, gandalf5166, SGRaaize, SocioPath, manho, Switz, tanstalas, Pikachu, Gollum, Furry, Kocc42
xVEZOKNERx (1): xVEZOKNERx

Noone (8): Everyone else

Vezokener is prob town.

Mod already said scum have fakeclaims in the sign up thread. Read better people.

So you rather trust your vote to Pikachu for his case on Kirby rather than your OWN reads of your own wagon?

Also it isn't a OTHER wagon, I'm on YOUR wagon, and so are a few other people. What reads do you have off the votes you on yourself you didn't comment on?

THIRD: If you're not against me getting the Smash Ball then vote me. Townvoting a dead end wagon is stupid. Especially since you yourself give no indication that you want the wagon to change to Furry, since you're fine with mine.

Frayed you are still voting Kirby over diddin.

This is inexcusable.

[FRIEND]

Fate wrote:Sitback and let me interrogate diddin, Friend.

Buuuut we make such a nice team! It's like good cop/bad cop.

Hold on Pikachu, I'm busy.

Frayed... you're online and it only takes 10seconds to say "you're right" and vote diddin.

I better see a full post from you coming soon.

@diddin: Responses to my questions will be appreciated.

Switz votes me for the apparent contradiction that I explained to be out of context, hasn't commented on me since, as well as this odd "people FoSing and HoSing him with out voting" thing I don't understand.

Reads on people on my wagon.

Fate and Pikachu are probably town.

Neutral on nacho and switz, neutral-scummy on zazi.

VEZOKENER, manho, and kocc42 are most likely to be scum on my wagon IMO.

Now you may be asking "but diddin, you said that zazi bandwagoned on you horribly too!" While it's true zazi wagoned on me, outside of that his posts have been more town than vezo/manho/kocc.

Kirby wagon isn't taking off, and VEZOKENER coasting and calling for a mass name claim has eclipsed Kirby's scumminess. UNVOTE: , VOTE: VEZOKENER

Fate If I'm reading the rules correctly you don't need a majority of townvotes and just the most, as such I'm voting Furry because I think he's more town than you. If it turns out we do need majority I will townvote you.

Yeah, I was reading other games though.

- thought I'd been voting him a while back.

diddin wrote:Switz votes me for the apparent contradiction that I explained to be out of context, hasn't commented on me since, as well as this odd "people FoSing and HoSing him with out voting" thing I don't understand.

Reads on people on my wagon.

Fate and Pikachu are probably town.

Neutral on nacho and switz, neutral-scummy on zazi.

VEZOKENER, manho, and kocc42 are most likely to be scum on my wagon IMO.

Now you may be asking "but diddin, you said that zazi bandwagoned on you horribly too!" While it's true zazi wagoned on me, outside of that his posts have been more town than vezo/manho/kocc.

Kirby wagon isn't taking off, and VEZOKENER coasting and calling for a mass name claim has eclipsed Kirby's scumminess. UNVOTE: , VOTE: VEZOKENER

Fate If I'm reading the rules correctly you don't need a majority of townvotes and just the most, as such I'm voting Furry because I think he's more town than you. If it turns out we do need majority I will townvote you.

Except that Kirby's wagon is the largest right now.

Therefore your excuse to switch off onto someone that was voting you (aka who I called you out on for not voting) is bullshit.

It doesn't say I need a majority, no. I'll take that point off your case though